|
Post by kcrufnek on Oct 27, 2018 22:02:41 GMT -6
We need one of those mob type flow boards to keep all of this straight.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 27, 2018 22:05:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Oct 28, 2018 6:18:56 GMT -6
Anyone in prison yet?
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 10:54:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Oct 28, 2018 11:13:24 GMT -6
In a hearing on October 15th, Concord Management claimed that the Special Counsel’s entire case is built around a 100 year old law that he Mueller team is trying to use in a manner it was not built for. @techno_Fog The Defense hits the Special Counsel for relying on a "100 year-old Supreme Court case which doesn't stand for the proposition that they want it to stand for" "The Special Counsel..never advised you" that the case required a willful violation of the law. pic.twitter.com/5V53wGiWYl 9:31 PM - Oct 23, 2018
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Oct 28, 2018 11:15:26 GMT -6
Then Concord Management accused Mueller of making up a crime because they don’t have evidence they need to push their cases forward –
@techno_Fog The blistering critique continues.
The Special Counsel didn't have the evidence, so they "make up a new crime that has never been charged in the history of the United States" pic.twitter.com/qCApwSViDp 9:50 PM - Oct 23, 2018 ......
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 12:00:08 GMT -6
Tweedie Bird lol
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 13:23:17 GMT -6
We need one of those mob type flow boards to keep all of this straight.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 13:25:20 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 13:26:20 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Oct 28, 2018 13:27:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Oct 30, 2018 12:05:47 GMT -6
Remember Democrats: “Believe all Women”. Special Counsel Robert Mueller was accused by a very credible witness today of rape at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City in 2010.
A formal press conference is scheduled for Thursday at noon in Washington DC.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Oct 30, 2018 12:13:12 GMT -6
www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-30/mueller-says-women-were-offered-money-make-false-claims-against-himMueller Says Women Were "Offered Money" To Make "False Claims" Against Him Special Counsel Robert Mueller has told the FBI that women were "offered money" to make "false claims" about him, according to CNBC. Mueller has referred the allegations to the FBI. www.cnbc.com/2018/10/30/mueller-accuses-opponents-of-offering-money-to-make-false-claims-about-him.htmlSpecial counsel spokesman Peter Carr said the following in a statement: When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation. On Tuesday, Conservative commentator, attorney and lobbyist Jack Burkman tweeted: "On Thursday, November 1, at the Rosslyn Holiday Inn at noon, we will reveal the first of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's sex assault victims. I applaud the courage and dignity and grace and strength of my client." Burkman also posted a teaser video on Facebook: In a Facebook video also posted Tuesday, Burkman claimed "we will unveil the first of the sex assault victims of Robert Mueller." In the video, Burkman said the "first" alleged accuser is "coming out this Thursday at high noon." He added: "Robert Mueller is a bad guy not just because of what he does inside the courtroom, but because of what he does outside the courtroom." -CNBC
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Oct 30, 2018 12:20:56 GMT -6
www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-30/mueller-says-women-were-offered-money-make-false-claims-against-himMueller Says Women Were "Offered Money" To Make "False Claims" Against Him Special Counsel Robert Mueller has told the FBI that women were "offered money" to make "false claims" about him, according to CNBC. Mueller has referred the allegations to the FBI. www.cnbc.com/2018/10/30/mueller-accuses-opponents-of-offering-money-to-make-false-claims-about-him.htmlSpecial counsel spokesman Peter Carr said the following in a statement: When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation. On Tuesday, Conservative commentator, attorney and lobbyist Jack Burkman tweeted: "On Thursday, November 1, at the Rosslyn Holiday Inn at noon, we will reveal the first of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's sex assault victims. I applaud the courage and dignity and grace and strength of my client." Burkman also posted a teaser video on Facebook: In a Facebook video also posted Tuesday, Burkman claimed "we will unveil the first of the sex assault victims of Robert Mueller." In the video, Burkman said the "first" alleged accuser is "coming out this Thursday at high noon." He added: "Robert Mueller is a bad guy not just because of what he does inside the courtroom, but because of what he does outside the courtroom." -CNBC This is a tough one. I do hope they have some corroborating proof. And if they do, I hope they present it with the accusations.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Oct 30, 2018 12:32:06 GMT -6
what happened to #believeallsurvivors
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Oct 30, 2018 13:22:53 GMT -6
Remember, we are playing by the rules that the left has put in place, so...
WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS! WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS! WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS!
#believeallwomen #believeallaccusers #rapert_mueller #lock_him_up #believe_muellers_victims #i_believe_jack_burkman
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Oct 30, 2018 14:13:47 GMT -6
Interesting timing: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6334189/Boston-gangster-Whitey-Bulger-killed-bars.htmlBoston gangster James ‘Whitey’ Bulger Jr. has been killed behind bars shortly after he was transferred to a federal prison in West Virginia. He was 89. Bulger was found dead overnight on Tuesday at USP Hazelton, a high-security prison with an adjacent minimum security satellite camp in Bruceton Mills. It emerged in Bulger’s 2013 trial that he had served as an FBI informant as far back as 1975, though he always denied the claim.
Law enforcement sources tell DailyMail.com that Whitey had been talking about outing people in the FBI – people in the top echelon of the informant program.
The sources said he hadn’t even been processed at the West Virginia facility when he was killed. But someone who knew he was being transferred put the word out – the killer had to know he was coming.
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Oct 30, 2018 15:01:16 GMT -6
So, the FBI is now investigating the claims against Mueller. Shouldn't Brett Kavanaugh have had the chance to ask the FBI to investigate Christine Ford's false claims against him? Seems only fair.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Oct 30, 2018 15:29:55 GMT -6
So, the FBI is now investigating the claims against Mueller. Shouldn't Brett Kavanaugh have had the chance to ask the FBI to investigate Christine Ford's false claims against him? Seems only fair. Its basically common knowledge among leftists I know/read that Ford's statement was leaked to the press by persons close to Ford, as opposed to Fienstien or her gang leaking it. And, they say Fienstien did not hide these allegations (which is why Kavanaugh wasnt afforded the opportunity for an FBI investigation), but instead she kept them secret at Fords request until someone Ford told previously leaked the story. This is why we need an investigation into what happened with Mrs Ford. It doesnt matter that Kavanaugh was confirmed. That is an unrelated fact. We need to continue to investigate this issue. The pubs need to concede that if somehow that investigation proves kavanaugh did something to Ford, he would prob have to step down. But, we need the truth, as it is the greater good. The truth will also put an end to many of these ridiculous political games, like hiding then leaking accusations when politically expedient.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 1, 2018 7:40:10 GMT -6
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/exclusive-jacob-wohl-jack-burkman-woman-accusing-mueller-of-rape-is-credible-vetted-media-protecting-special-counsel-video/The woman accusing Robert Mueller of rape has nothing to financially gain from coming forward with her allegations against the special counsel and her testimony can be corroborated, the attorney representing the accuser and the journalist who discovered the accuser explained. In an exclusive interview with the Gateway Pundit, journalist and founder of Sure Fire intelligence Jacob Wohl and Washington DC based attorney Jack Burkman debunked media reports claiming they paid women to accuse Mueller, the special counsel tasked with investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election, of sexual assault. “I am the biggest skeptic in the world of the #MeToo movement. My default position is not to believe the women – you’ve seen that over and over again as one story after another has come out. And that indeed was my default position in this case. I don’t care who’s getting accused or who’s accusing – my default position is I don’t believe it until its proven, until its corroborated,” Wohl explained. “I went through the story with the accuser, the gal who had hired our firm, and I asked her many, many questions– where did it happen? When did it happen? Do you have any corroborating witnesses? And over and over again I determined her credibility to be very high, very high.” Several major news outlets, including Politico and the Daily Beast, reported that a woman named “Lorraine Parsons” of Fort Myers, Florida emailed various reporters claiming she was offered money to falsely accuse Mueller of sexual misconduct. “The woman, Lorraine Parsons of Fort Myers, Florida, said a man named Bill Christensen knew exactly how much credit card debt she had and was willing to orchestrate paying off $34,000 — in addition to cutting a check for $20,000 if she made allegations,” reported Politico. However, “Lorraine Parsons” declined to speak by telephone to various journalists, who could not confirm information about her, including whether that’s the real name of the person emailing journalists or whether a Lorraine Parsons exists at all.Burkman and Wohl maintain that they have never interacted with Parsons and claimed Parsons is a “phantom” the media is using to discredit the real accuser.
|
|
|
Post by reddeadredemption on Nov 1, 2018 23:25:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by NN on Nov 2, 2018 0:01:40 GMT -6
This. And the Blexit thread are like...
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 2, 2018 7:59:35 GMT -6
Believe all women was started by your side, or does that only work when you disagree with that person politically? It’s hard to keep up with the double standards of the left,(similarly to using left leaning snopes to fact check things, but it’s all you have).
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 2, 2018 8:02:04 GMT -6
This. And the Blexit thread are like... Looks more like the mythical blue wave we were being sold on since 2016.
|
|
|
Post by reddeadredemption on Nov 2, 2018 8:37:41 GMT -6
Believe all women was started by your side, or does that only work when you disagree with that person politically? It’s hard to keep up with the double standards of the left,(similarly to using left leaning snopes to fact check things, but it’s all you have). I don't have a 'side' - that said, legitimate allegations brought by legitimate women should be taken seriously. This political stunt literally does everything that republicans accuse democrats of doing ( great article here) and is the very definition of fake news (not 'fake news' that is news that's not favorable for the president). I realize you're looking at a lens of 'this is a right-wing source, so it has to be more legitimate than those left-leaning sources' - but by doing so you're not looking at actual facts in this particular situation. I mean, did you see the picture of Christoph Waltz or supermodel Bar Rafaeli the guy used as Linkedin profiles? Did you see his denial having anything to do with 'Surefire Intelligence' and then now saying it's his company (if you can even call it that)? Can you not connect the dots of emails coming from Surefire Intelligence's domain asking women who have talked to Mueller if they would frame him? Unless you've gone completely tinfoil hat and think that everything the media is saying is false and believe the words of a 20-year-old kid who has already been disgraced/fined as a 'hedge-fund manager' (lol) that advertises his services on Craigslist. If that's the case - best of luck to you.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 2, 2018 9:11:19 GMT -6
Believe all women was started by your side, or does that only work when you disagree with that person politically? It’s hard to keep up with the double standards of the left,(similarly to using left leaning snopes to fact check things, but it’s all you have). I don't have a 'side' - that said, legitimate allegations brought by legitimate women should be taken seriously. This political stunt literally does everything that republicans accuse democrats of doing ( great article here) and is the very definition of fake news (not 'fake news' that is news that's not favorable for the president). I realize you're looking at a lens of 'this is a right-wing source, so it has to be more legitimate than those left-leaning sources' - but by doing so you're not looking at actual facts in this particular situation. I mean, did you see the picture of Christoph Waltz or supermodel Bar Rafaeli the guy used as Linkedin profiles? Did you see his denial having anything to do with 'Surefire Intelligence' and then now saying it's his company (if you can even call it that)? Can you not connect the dots of emails coming from Surefire Intelligence's domain asking women who have talked to Mueller if they would frame him? Unless you've gone completely tinfoil hat and think that everything the media is saying is false and believe the words of a 20-year-old kid who has already been disgraced/fined as a 'hedge-fund manager' (lol) that advertises his services on Craigslist. If that's the case - best of luck to you. I likewise don’t have a side as I’m a registered independent voter, however, what I’m exposing with this is the charade of hypocrisy by those who oppose President Trump, his decisions, etc,(much as you and others here have). As for facts, this one here has as much “facts” and “legitimate allegations” as what the Dems & their MSM sycophants had against Kavanaugh and the whole Russia narrative, yet it didn’t stop those on that side of the aisle,(& those vocally opposed to the President here), from running with it. However, simply turn the tables with the same scenario and their view points change,(thus revealing their blatant hypocrisy that is created due to their dislike for the current President and their unwillingness to accept their several elections in a row defeats by the voting public). As for tin hats, again, check the Kavanaugh & Russia collusion fiascos and get back with me.
|
|
|
Post by reddeadredemption on Nov 2, 2018 9:30:16 GMT -6
I don't have a 'side' - that said, legitimate allegations brought by legitimate women should be taken seriously. This political stunt literally does everything that republicans accuse democrats of doing ( great article here) and is the very definition of fake news (not 'fake news' that is news that's not favorable for the president). I realize you're looking at a lens of 'this is a right-wing source, so it has to be more legitimate than those left-leaning sources' - but by doing so you're not looking at actual facts in this particular situation. I mean, did you see the picture of Christoph Waltz or supermodel Bar Rafaeli the guy used as Linkedin profiles? Did you see his denial having anything to do with 'Surefire Intelligence' and then now saying it's his company (if you can even call it that)? Can you not connect the dots of emails coming from Surefire Intelligence's domain asking women who have talked to Mueller if they would frame him? Unless you've gone completely tinfoil hat and think that everything the media is saying is false and believe the words of a 20-year-old kid who has already been disgraced/fined as a 'hedge-fund manager' (lol) that advertises his services on Craigslist. If that's the case - best of luck to you. I likewise don’t have a side as I’m a registered independent voter, however, what I’m exposing with this is the charade of hypocrisy by those who oppose President Trump, his decisions, etc,(much as you and others here have). As for facts, this one here has as much “facts” and “legitimate allegations” as what the Dems & their MSM sycophants had against Kavanaugh and the whole Russia narrative, yet it didn’t stop those on that side of the aisle,(& those vocally opposed to the President here), from running with it. However, simply turn the tables with the same scenario and their view points change,(thus revealing their blatant hypocrisy that is created due to their dislike for the current President and their unwillingness to accept their several elections in a row defeats by the voting public). As for tin hats, again, check the Kavanaugh & Russia collusion fiascos and get back with me. So whataboutisms and ignoring facts from each situation and assigning blanket statements/apples-to-oranges comparisons. Got it. Thanks! This is not the 'same scenario' no matter how much you want it to be.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 2, 2018 10:14:42 GMT -6
I don't have a 'side' - that said, legitimate allegations brought by legitimate women should be taken seriously. This political stunt literally does everything that republicans accuse democrats of doing ( great article here) and is the very definition of fake news (not 'fake news' that is news that's not favorable for the president). I realize you're looking at a lens of 'this is a right-wing source, so it has to be more legitimate than those left-leaning sources' - but by doing so you're not looking at actual facts in this particular situation. I mean, did you see the picture of Christoph Waltz or supermodel Bar Rafaeli the guy used as Linkedin profiles? Did you see his denial having anything to do with 'Surefire Intelligence' and then now saying it's his company (if you can even call it that)? Can you not connect the dots of emails coming from Surefire Intelligence's domain asking women who have talked to Mueller if they would frame him? Unless you've gone completely tinfoil hat and think that everything the media is saying is false and believe the words of a 20-year-old kid who has already been disgraced/fined as a 'hedge-fund manager' (lol) that advertises his services on Craigslist. If that's the case - best of luck to you. This was a sketchy claim at best made by individuals. They should be prosecuted if possible. This is different from ford as with her she had a sitting Senator not only behind here and helping her but that Senator sat on the committee she would be appearing before. That Senator seemed to be running interference and obstructing. Ford also had high powered, left wing lawyers and supporters. Big, big difference.
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Nov 2, 2018 10:44:26 GMT -6
WE DON'T NEED ANY EVIDENCE, WITNESSES, DOCUMENTATION OR CORROBORATION....THIS WOMAN'S WORD IS ALL THAT MATTERS!!!11!!@@!!! RAPERT MUELLER NEEDS TO BE LOCKED UP IN JAIL AND THE KEY THROWN AWAY@@@!!!!!!! WHY ARE SOME OF YOU SUCH RAPE-ENABLERS??? WHY DO YOU HATE WOMEN?!?!?!?!? #BELIEVEWOMEN #BELIEVESURIVOVRS
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 2, 2018 10:57:39 GMT -6
WE DON'T NEED ANY EVIDENCE, WITNESSES, DOCUMENTATION OR CORROBORATION....THIS WOMAN'S WORD IS ALL THAT MATTERS!!!11!!@@!!! RAPERT MUELLER NEEDS TO BE LOCKED UP IN JAIL AND THE KEY THROWN AWAY@@@!!!!!!! WHY ARE SOME OF YOU SUCH RAPE-ENABLERS??? WHY DO YOU HATE WOMEN?!?!?!?!? #BELIEVEWOMEN #BELIEVESURIVOVRS Where are the mobs of women clawing at his door and trapping him in elevators?
|
|