|
|
Post by jimmy on Jun 15, 2018 0:46:55 GMT -6
 Look at that pseudo patriotic pussy. Where was he when the nation called him to take up arms? I shake my head at you fuck ups that cant see through his obvious bullshit. He realizes dumbfuck, racist rednecks eat shit up like this pic....suckers What he realizes is that it triggers whiny little bitches like you. |
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jun 15, 2018 0:52:32 GMT -6
What he realizes is that it triggers whiny little bitches like you. He represents everything that's wrong with mankind. What does that say about you? |
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jun 15, 2018 0:54:52 GMT -6
What he realizes is that it triggers whiny little bitches like you. He represents everything that's wrong with mankind. What does that say about you? He has the innate ability to recognize a drama queen? |
|
|
|
Post by okie52 on Jun 15, 2018 1:12:50 GMT -6
What he realizes is that it triggers whiny little bitches like you. He represents everything that's wrong with mankind. What does that say about you? Damn Gaucho. You made it over. Congrats. i was laughing at people crying over illegals being separated from their future US taxpayer supported children...but I forgot to account for your feelings on the matter. I hope you’re not too severely traumatized by the U.S enforcing its territorial sovereignty. Next thing you know theyll be kicking out illegal pizza delivery guys. |
|
|
|
Post by politicalmexininja on Jun 15, 2018 4:51:22 GMT -6
Today was solely about exposing them. The bigger stuff is yet to come. Today is not about arrests its just exposure. This is a war and today was just one battle. Its a war because a politcal party tried a coup against our country, our values and our morales. No shots were fired but its a war nonetheless. Its all tied togethef the email scandal and the fake collusion. This goes all the way to the top to Obama and Crooked Hillary. Deep state actors. There will be much more to come. People across the country and just now starting to get a sense of it when the FBI says Trump will not become President. Lots more hidden that will be rooted out. This is Germany Hitler type stuff they attempted. To get Crooked Hillary in office to then hide all these crimes. Imagine how none of ghis comes to light if she’s elected. If they do this we know they cooked the ballot boxes too - and still lost. Shows how many really voted for Trump to overcome this. I keep saying it but Trump saved our country. The only candidate who could have won. He cane along at the exact right time in our history. Happy Birthday Mr President! Those seeking proof of 'God' need look no further....no way Trump should have won but through divine intervention... |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 6:13:24 GMT -6
www.weeklystandard.com/eric-felten/meet-the-other-amorous-fbi-staffers-who-texted-about-the-clinton-email-investigationPerhaps the most shocking information in the IG’s report is the revelation that Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were not the only amorous agents with a habit of texting. There were also “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,” who were involved in the Clinton investigation and, according to the IG’s report “were in a relationship at the time and are now married.” Their communications make for a searing indictment of the culture of the FBI and paint a portrait of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices as fiasco. A few days before the Clinton confab, he sent an instant-message in which he complained about how many agents and attorneys were prepping for the questioning: “… very aggravating making this flow with 20+ voices for disparate information anyway.” Fair enough. But then, as the message goes on he suggests that he has a certain lack of enthusiasm for the whole affair. “We have nothing—shouldn’t even be interviewing” Just in case his girlfriend didn’t savvy the full extent of his disgruntlement at the prospect of interviewing Hillary Clinton, Agent 1 added “My god … I’m actually starting to have embarrassment sprinkled on my disappointment. … Ever been forced to do something you adamantly opposed.”… …There are reasons to think that Agent 1 was dissatisfied because the organization was phoning in a politically determined investigation. But there are also reasons to think his unhappiness flowed from an admiration for Hillary. Take his message to Agent 5 after completing the questioning of Clinton: “done interviewing the President.”
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 6:18:42 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/31874/justice-department-ig-recommends-investigation-5-james-barrettHours after Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he was prepared to fire bad actors in the bureau based on the recommendations of the Justice Department inspector general, the IG recommended the investigation of five FBI agents for anti-Trump bias. Speaking about the anticipated report in an interview that aired Thursday, Sessions said, "If anyone else shows up in this report to have done something that requires termination we will do so." In the damning report released Thursday, the IG referred five FBI employees for investigation over their politically charged texts demonstrating bias against Donald Trump and for Hillary Clinton, revealing that even more agents were overtly biased than previously known. Several messages, the report explains, "appeared to mix political opinion with discussions about the MYE investigation" (an abbreviation for "Midyear Exam," code for the Clinton investigation). "Some of these text messages and instant messages mixed political commentary with discussions about the Midyear investigation, and raised concerns that political bias may have impacted investigative decisions," the report read, Fox News notes. "The text messages and instant messages sent by these employees included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for candidate Clinton," the report states. Below are a few examples highlighted by Fox: The report revealed instant messages between unnamed agents, labeled “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,” discussing their jobs in August 2016. “I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an absolute f---ing idiot. If you don’t think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drumpf,” Agent 1 sent. “I forgot about drumpf…that’s so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him,” Agent 5 responded. “Someone who can’t answer a question. Someone who can’t be professional for even a second.” In September, Agent 1 and 5 conversed again, bashing Trump supporters as “retarded.” “I’m trying to think of a ‘would I rather’ instead of spending time with those people,” Agent 5 sent. Agent 1 asked, “stick your tongue in a fan??” Agent 5 later wrote: “I would rather have brunch with trump and a bunch of his supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded.” Among the five FBI officials, who are not named, may be Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, whose bias against Trump has been widely reported. However, the IG revealed one particularly alarming text from Strzok that had not previously come to light. "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Page wrote in a message to Strzok, with whom she was having a romantic relationship. "No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it," replied Strzok. Strzok played key roles not only in the Clinton investigation, but also in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Trump before Strzok was removed for anti-Trump bias. In a statement to Fox, Strzok's attorney insisted that his client never allowed his political bias to influence his actions in his work for the bureau. While Republicans have pointed to the overwhelming evidence of political bias against Trump, with no evidence of bias in favor of him or against Clinton, Democrats are focusing on the IG's conclusion that he did not find clear evidence that political bias "directly" influenced the actions of the FBI. "There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors," the IG explains. "However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions." Ultimately, the IG slams Comey and the other bad actors for "cast[ing] a cloud" over how the bureau handled the investigation of Clinton. What will come of the five agents recommended for investigation remains to be seen.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 6:21:12 GMT -6
thefederalist.com/2018/06/15/comeys-fbi-protecting-legitimacy-presumed-clinton-presidency/Comey’s FBI Was Protecting The Legitimacy Of The Presumed Clinton Presidency James Comey and the FBI decided to come clean on Anthony Weiner's laptop because they thought they were protecting a Hillary Clinton presidency. David Marcus By David Marcus JUNE 15, 2018 In late October of 2016 James Comey knew Donald Trump’s candidacy was as dead as a doornail. That must be distinctly understood or nothing wonderful can come from the story I am going to relate. Time soothes the edges of old emotions. We forget the shock of that election night. Almost two years now of articles and TV takes, even books, make Trump’s election seem understandable, even sometimes inevitable. But that’s not how it was then. When FBI director Comey and the FBI dropped their late October Anthony Weiner surprise, they did so fully confident that Hillary Clinton would win. What we now know for certain from the Department of Justice inspector general report that came out Thursday is that the FBI chose to disclose the Weiner email fiasco to protect a Clinton presidency, a foregone conclusion, from potential claims from Trump that the FBI had rigged the election. Who Knows What Comey Remembers? Comey gave us a taste of this back in April when George Stephanopoulos asked if he was assuming Clinton would win. He said: “I don’t remember consciously thinking about that, but it must have been. I was operating in a world where Hillary Clinton was going to beat Donald Trump. I’m sure that it was a factor. I don’t remember spelling it out, but it had to have been. That she’s going to be elected president, and if I hide this from the American people, she’ll be illegitimate the moment she’s elected, the moment this comes out.” Whatever acid trip Comey was on that makes him feel only now that somehow this reality must have unconsciously affected his decision-making, the IG report presents much more self-aware choices. Take this testimony from Comey himself. The norm he talks about is not revealing information that can affect an election in the days leading up to it: And so I said okay, those are the doors. One says speak, the other says conceal. Let’s see what’s behind the speak door. It’s really bad. We’re 11 days from a presidential election. Given the norm I’ve long operated under, that’s really bad. Open the second one. Catastrophic. And again this is something reasonable people can disagree about, but my view was to conceal at that point given all I had said would be catastrophic. Not just to the Bureau, but beyond the Bureau… What does “beyond the bureau” mean? Well, the IG report gives us a good idea what “beyond” means here. It means consequences to a Hillary Clinton presidency. This just becomes clearer and clearer as you read the report. This wasn’t just Emo Twitter Comey having a lot of threads in his old Duder head, it was a calculated approach by the FBI to protect Clinton’s presidency from claims that the FBI rigged her election. That was the big fear at the time: When Clinton obviously wins, will Trump accept the results, or foment a revolt based on spurious claims of election-rigging. Remember? We no longer have to wonder if such political concerns influenced the FBI. Former FBI general counsel James A. Baker spelled it out in the IG report: “If she’s been elected president of the United States, then Donald Trump would say, oh my God, these people knew this beforehand and didn’t say anything. This is a rigged system. This is, this, these people intentionally hid that until after the election so they could get her elected and, and thwart me.” So what we now know, despite the IG report’s claims otherwise, is that politics played a significant role in the FBI’s decision to reveal the renewed investigation into Weiner’s laptop just days before the election. It was a calculated risk. Might it hurt Hillary? Sure, but she can’t lose, so better to protect against potential damage after her slam-dunk election passes through the hoop. Then election night happened. Hoo boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 6:24:53 GMT -6
When I connect the dots here I see a fairly clear pattern. Senior leadership in the previous administration was exceptionally confident of who would win the presidential election in 2016. Based on that, reenforced by the clear bias that they favored one candidate and strongly wanted to curry favor with that particular person, actions were taken to curry favor. All of this is easy to do while still giving the IG the ability to say, “no evidence that political bias impacts specific decisions” because the IG simply classifies all of these malfeasance-oriented activities as personal bias and informed self interest. Let’s face it, these bad actors were all looking out for themselves based on the foundation knowledge that they were going to be working for Clinton.
With that it’s easy to see why the IG phrases as much of the report as a soft rebuke of individuals covering their ass. In reality, carefully looking at the structure of actions and statements in the IG report, there was a coordinated effort by the personnel involved that could be called conspiracy and was a defacto political effort. The softness of the report also hides the fact that a huge number of people associated with the activities described in the report failed in their duties to act when they recognized improper behaviour and possibly illegal activities. Those unnamed people are largely shielded by the IG report framing things as individual missteps by individual personnel rather than recognizing the organized, systemic, institutional situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 6:26:18 GMT -6
The left’s spin is already beginning: www.yahoo.com/news/doj-watchdog-remind-us-fbi-145555439.htmlDOJ Watchdog Report Takeaway: FBI Hurt Hillary Clinton, Not Donald Trump WASHINGTON ― The Justice Department’s internal watchdog just served up a hefty dose of reality to President Donald Trump and his allies. On Thursday afternoon, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz released a report 17 months in the making on the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation during the 2016 election. Amid the unfolding special counsel investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, Trump and his supporters have been waging war against the FBI and Justice Department. The new report is sure to give them fresh material. But one takeaway from the document stands out: Despite Republican suggestions that anti-Trump forces within the FBI worked against Trump, the bureau’s public actions during the campaign hurt Clinton and helped Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 7:38:18 GMT -6
Steve Doocy: Should James Comey be locked up?
President Trump: Well, look, I would never want to get involved in that. Certainly, they really seem like very criminal acts to me. What he did was criminal. What he did was a terrible thing to the people. What he did was so bad in regard to our Constitution, in terms of the well-being of our country. Should he be locked up? Let somebody make a determination. Look at all the dishonest things that Crooked Hillary did. Look what’s gone on. It’s very sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 7:40:36 GMT -6
dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/comey-claimed-doj-intimidated-clinton-lawyers/The Justice Department’s Inspector General report states that former FBI Director James Comey and other bureau witnesses claimed Hillary Clinton’s legal team “intimidated” DOJ attorneys to place unusual restrictions on the bureau’s investigation of her private email server. The report says, “Comey, Baker, and other FBI witnesses told us that they believed the prosecutors were overly cautious about obtaining the laptops because they were intimidated by high-powered defense counsel like [Beth] Wilkinson.” The report also describes other FBI witnesses who made the same claim — including agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, whose text messages in the report revealed their political bias against Donald Trump becoming president. “Some FBI witnesses told us, consistent with text message exchanges between [Peter] Strzok and [Lisa] Page, that the FBI was concerned that the line [Network Security Division] prosecutors were intimidated by the high-powered attorneys representing Clinton and her senior aides and, as a result, did not negotiate aggressively with them,” the report states.
|
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Jun 15, 2018 7:41:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Jun 15, 2018 7:46:03 GMT -6
Look at that pseudo patriotic pussy. Where was he when the nation called him to take up arms? I shake my head at you fuck ups that cant see through his obvious bullshit. He realizes dumbfuck, racist rednecks eat shit up like this pic....suckers Is there any doubt anymore that you Democrats are the Party of Hate? With every hateful thing you guys say, every message board comment, every threat on Twitter/Facebook, every award-show profanity, every presidential assassination fantasy, it becomes more and more self-evident that the Democrat Party is the largest hate group in the nation and therefore, the world. |
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jun 15, 2018 7:56:25 GMT -6
Nothing will happen.
There could be the most damning evidence but until the typical Americans gives a crap, nothing will happen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 15, 2018 8:20:11 GMT -6
What needs to be realized is that pictures like this drive feckless, dickless, brainless, souless, liberal twats like you insane. #winning
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 15, 2018 8:23:32 GMT -6
The left’s spin is already beginning: www.yahoo.com/news/doj-watchdog-remind-us-fbi-145555439.htmlDOJ Watchdog Report Takeaway: FBI Hurt Hillary Clinton, Not Donald Trump WASHINGTON ― The Justice Department’s internal watchdog just served up a hefty dose of reality to President Donald Trump and his allies. On Thursday afternoon, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz released a report 17 months in the making on the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation during the 2016 election. Amid the unfolding special counsel investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, Trump and his supporters have been waging war against the FBI and Justice Department. The new report is sure to give them fresh material. But one takeaway from the document stands out: Despite Republican suggestions that anti-Trump forces within the FBI worked against Trump, the bureau’s public actions during the campaign hurt Clinton and helped Trump. Did you listen to Christopher Wray? It sounded like he was doing a recruiting viseo. All that was missing was brass bands and waving flags. |
|
|
|
Post by okie52 on Jun 15, 2018 8:25:24 GMT -6
Look at that pseudo patriotic pussy. Where was he when the nation called him to take up arms? Well i guess guess he was standing in the same line as Clinton and Obama. |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 8:50:36 GMT -6
So, back to blaming Comey,(I guess this means we can go ahead and cancel the Mueller investigation then): dailycaller.com/2018/06/15/morning-joe-trump-comey-won/MSNBC’s morning host Joe Scarborough suggested that the inspector general’s report proves that former FBI Director James Comey’s actions actually helped President Trump during the election. “Donald Trump himself will not admit that James Comey, who he loathes, is the reason why he’s president of the United States,” Morning Joe stated. “See, the IG report again, for those that are just tuning in, or for those who are too slow to actually operate household appliances, the bottom line of this report is that James Comey and FBI agents held on to evidence of Anthony Weiner’s laptop for a month, said they didn’t have time to actually look at it,” Scarborough continued. “And so they waited a month and then sent that letter 10 days before the election, guaranteeing that it would destroy Hillary Clinton’s campaign.” The inspector general’s report showed previously unreleased text messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, in which Strzok said, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” (RELATED: ‘Willingness’ To Impact The Election: IG’s Clinton Report Is Loaded With Bombshells “If we’re looking at what actually happened after some text messages were sent, that’s what happened and it accrued solely to the benefit of Donald J. Trump,” he concluded. |
|
|
|
Post by freeskydives4commies on Jun 15, 2018 8:53:07 GMT -6
From the OIG report. The Director of the fucking FBI is trying to say he didn't know that Anthony Weiner was married to Clinton's aide Abedin? You shittin' me with this? (Page 9)  |
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jun 15, 2018 8:58:01 GMT -6
From the OIG report. The Director of the fucking FBI is trying to say he didn't know that Anthony Weiner was married to Clinton's aide Abedin? You shittin' me with this? (Page 9) It appears the swamp is deeper than we thought... |
|
|
|
Post by kingswitz on Jun 15, 2018 9:37:56 GMT -6
From the OIG report. The Director of the fucking FBI is trying to say he didn't know that Anthony Weiner was married to Clinton's aide Abedin? You shittin' me with this? (Page 9) Just like Obama finding out on the tv news that Hillary had a private server... When all else fails, claim ignorance. This is just... Good Lord, I need a drink. |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 9:53:32 GMT -6
Flashback: www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/14/obama-had-direct-contact-with-clinton-on-private-email-server-ig-report.htmlPresident Obama was one of a select handful of individuals who had “direct contact” with Hillary Clinton on her private email account, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz indicated in his bombshell report Thursday on the Clinton email probe. In a footnote, the DOJ watchdog notes that “FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us that former President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account.“ ....... Care to comment now sir? |
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 15, 2018 9:56:43 GMT -6
This is amazing how connected they are. When he said Trump will not be POTUS then this:
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸
@jackposobiec
·
6m
Peter Strzok sent this text the same week he opened Operation Crossfire and traveled to London, but don't worry, bc there's no bias at the FBI, folks
|
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 15, 2018 10:18:18 GMT -6
Look at that pseudo patriotic pussy. Where was he when the nation called him to take up arms? I shake my head at you fuck ups that cant see through his obvious bullshit. He realizes dumbfuck, racist rednecks eat shit up like this pic....suckers Do you think the clear questions in the govt (as noted by the IG report yesterday) would have been publicly noted (or at all) if Hillary has been elected? If not, how important is that, versus his obvious personal faults? (I'm trying to engage you in some real conversation. Prob a good idea to give it a try; if not with me, with others) |
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 15, 2018 11:48:15 GMT -6
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸
@jackposobiec
·
5m
Paul Manafort going to jail over Ukraine work, massive IG Report released about FBI corruption, Mueller almost at year 2 of the investigation, and I'm still just waiting for one scintilla of evidence Trump colluded with Russia to win the election
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 11:52:52 GMT -6
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
#IncompleteInvestigation
BREAKING: IG Horowitz confirms his staff did not recover all of Strzok's or Page's text messages from the December 15, 2016 - May 17, 2017 "gap" period when FBI suffered mysterious archiving"glitch" ...
(more)
11:59 AM - Jun 15, 2018
476
414 people are talking about this
.....
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
#IncompleteInvestigation
BREAKING: IG Horowitz confirms his staff did not recover all of Strzok's or Page's text messages from the December 15, 2016 - May 17, 2017 "gap" period when FBI suffered mysterious archiving"glitch" ...
(more)
11:59 AM - Jun 15, 2018
476
414 people are talking about this
......
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
#IncompleteInvestigation
BREAKING: IG Horowitz confirms his staff did not recover all of Strzok's or Page's text messages from the December 15, 2016 - May 17, 2017 "gap" period when FBI suffered mysterious archiving"glitch" ...
(more)
11:59 AM - Jun 15, 2018
476
414 people are talking about this
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 12:28:33 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/31878/kimberley-strassel-anybody-saying-ig-didnt-find-james-barrettExcerpt: In a series of tweets on Thursday, The Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel provided a succinct summary of why she maintains that anyone trying to claim that IG Michael Horowitz "didn't find bias" is full of it. Below is the full text of her series of tweets, followed by the tweets themselves: Don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. He very carefully says that he found no "documentary" evidence that bias produced "specific investigatory decisions." That's different. It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like: "Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for President." But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them. And he very specifically says in the summary that they "cast a cloud" on the entire "investigation's credibility." That's pretty damning. Meanwhile this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrate such bias, seamlessly moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got that one right? Also don't believe anyone who says this is just about Comey and his instances of insubordination. (Though they are bad enough.) This is an indictment broadly of an FBI culture that believes itself above the rules it imposes on others. People failing to adhere to their recusals (Kadzik/McCabe). Lynch hanging with Bill. Staff helping Comey conceal details of presser from DOJ bosses. Use of personal email and laptops. Leaks. Accepting gifts from media. Agent affairs/relationships. It also contains stunning examples of incompetence. Comey explains that he wasn't aware the Weiner laptop was big deal because he didn't know Weiner was married to Abedin? Then they sit on it a month, either cuz it fell through cracks (wow) or were more obsessed w/Trump. And I can still hear the echo of the howls from when Trump fired Comey. Still waiting to hear the apologies now that this report has backstopped the Rosenstein memo and the obvious grounds for dismissal.
|
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 15, 2018 12:34:14 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/31878/kimberley-strassel-anybody-saying-ig-didnt-find-james-barrettExcerpt: In a series of tweets on Thursday, The Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel provided a succinct summary of why she maintains that anyone trying to claim that IG Michael Horowitz "didn't find bias" is full of it. Below is the full text of her series of tweets, followed by the tweets themselves: Don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. He very carefully says that he found no "documentary" evidence that bias produced "specific investigatory decisions." That's different. It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like: "Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for President." But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them. And he very specifically says in the summary that they "cast a cloud" on the entire "investigation's credibility." That's pretty damning. Meanwhile this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrate such bias, seamlessly moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got that one right? Also don't believe anyone who says this is just about Comey and his instances of insubordination. (Though they are bad enough.) This is an indictment broadly of an FBI culture that believes itself above the rules it imposes on others. People failing to adhere to their recusals (Kadzik/McCabe). Lynch hanging with Bill. Staff helping Comey conceal details of presser from DOJ bosses. Use of personal email and laptops. Leaks. Accepting gifts from media. Agent affairs/relationships. It also contains stunning examples of incompetence. Comey explains that he wasn't aware the Weiner laptop was big deal because he didn't know Weiner was married to Abedin? Then they sit on it a month, either cuz it fell through cracks (wow) or were more obsessed w/Trump. And I can still hear the echo of the howls from when Trump fired Comey. Still waiting to hear the apologies now that this report has backstopped the Rosenstein memo and the obvious grounds for dismissal. Can’t like this enough. Looking forward to the hearings, so he can be asked if he believes in the bias directly. You know that’s the question we all want to hear the answer to. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 15, 2018 12:36:41 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/31878/kimberley-strassel-anybody-saying-ig-didnt-find-james-barrettExcerpt: In a series of tweets on Thursday, The Wall Street Journal's Kimberley Strassel provided a succinct summary of why she maintains that anyone trying to claim that IG Michael Horowitz "didn't find bias" is full of it. Below is the full text of her series of tweets, followed by the tweets themselves: Don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. He very carefully says that he found no "documentary" evidence that bias produced "specific investigatory decisions." That's different. It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like: "Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for President." But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them. And he very specifically says in the summary that they "cast a cloud" on the entire "investigation's credibility." That's pretty damning. Meanwhile this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrate such bias, seamlessly moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got that one right? Also don't believe anyone who says this is just about Comey and his instances of insubordination. (Though they are bad enough.) This is an indictment broadly of an FBI culture that believes itself above the rules it imposes on others. People failing to adhere to their recusals (Kadzik/McCabe). Lynch hanging with Bill. Staff helping Comey conceal details of presser from DOJ bosses. Use of personal email and laptops. Leaks. Accepting gifts from media. Agent affairs/relationships. It also contains stunning examples of incompetence. Comey explains that he wasn't aware the Weiner laptop was big deal because he didn't know Weiner was married to Abedin? Then they sit on it a month, either cuz it fell through cracks (wow) or were more obsessed w/Trump. And I can still hear the echo of the howls from when Trump fired Comey. Still waiting to hear the apologies now that this report has backstopped the Rosenstein memo and the obvious grounds for dismissal. Can’t like this enough. Looking forward to the hearings, so he can be asked if he believes in the bias directly. You know that’s the question we all want to hear the answer to. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Agree. One of Gowdy, etc will definitely ask him upfront that question and he will have to answer it. I’m curious to see how he responds as well. But I agree, Ms. Strassel nailed it perfectly. |
|
