|
Post by kcrufnek on May 8, 2019 1:13:24 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 8, 2019 1:14:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 8, 2019 1:16:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 9, 2019 8:27:52 GMT -6
www.oregonlive.com/news/2019/05/woman-indicted-in-aggravated-theft-from-2017-portland-womens-march.htmlRebekah Katherine Brewis was indicted Tuesday by a grand jury in Multnomah County on three counts of first degree aggravated theft from the Women’s March on Portland and two counts of felony computer crime. Each of the three theft counts is for money “of the total value of $10,000 or more, the property of Women’s March on Portland,” according to court documents. Brewis was one of the organizers of the original Portland Women’s March, which drew between 70,000 and 100,000 to downtown Portland to protest the inauguration of President Donald Trump in January 2017.
But in late February of that year, organizers became embroiled in a dispute over missing t-shirt sales and donation money.According to a Facebook post at the time from the lead organizer of the event Margaret Jacobsen, Brewis agreed to have her organization, PDX Trans Pride, act as “fiscal sponsor” of the event so the Women’s March could collect tax-deductible donations and raise money to pay for costs associated with the 2017 march. However, according to Jacobsen, there was no written contract regarding the fiscal sponsorship. An investigation by The Oregonian/OregonLive showed that PDX Trans Pride was not at the time a 501c3 non-profit with the ability to take tax deductible donations at all. In the Facebook post, Jacobsen wrote that after the event, PDX Trans Pride refused to account for the funds, which Jacobsen believed to be at least $22,000 from t-shirt sales and an unknown amount in direct donations. In a phone message left with The Oregonian/OregonLive at the time, Brewis said, “The allegations are absolutely unfounded.”
|
|
|
Post by redstripe on May 9, 2019 10:19:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 9, 2019 12:57:53 GMT -6
So, they hold a vigil for the survivors & this happened:
Students response:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 9, 2019 17:52:07 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 4:21:56 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 6:32:54 GMT -6
From the same person who refuses to admit that she lost her election through legitimate means:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 6:39:05 GMT -6
amp.dailycaller.com/2019/05/10/brian-benjamin-tucker-carlson-trump-taxes-new-yorkNew York state Sen. Brian Benjamin argued for the concept of following “the law” regarding his state helping House Democrats obtain President Donald Trump’s taxes, but when Fox News host Tucker Carlson brought up cooperating with federal immigration law, it was a whole different matter. Carlson jumped right into the New York state Senate’s Wednesday passage of the TRUST Act, a bill that would facilitate the handing over of Trump’s state tax returns to Congress. “But it’s bigger than just Trump, right?” Carlson asked. “Is there anything that should be private?” Benjamin jumped into the legalese behind the congressional request, but Carlson wasn’t having it. “You want to destroy somebody because you don’t like him, right?” he asked. After a tense back-and-forth, Carlson brought up another issue to make a point. “You don’t want to help ICE keep the border secure, right? It’s a sanctuary state. But you will help the Congress pull a guy’s tax returns because you are facilitating an investigation? I mean, just be honest.” (RELATED: Tucker Asked Jorge Ramos How Many Caravan Migrants He Planned To Take In — Things Got Awkward Fast) “I wonder, is anybody going to stop lying for like 10 seconds in the last year?” Carlson continued. “Just be honest and say, I don’t like the guy. I want to destroy him. I will do whatever it takes. I see that as my job, and if that means releasing his tax returns against his wishes, I will do that.” “It’s congressional oversight over the executive branch,” said Benjamin. “If the Congress asks for his tax returns, — that is the law. All we are saying is we want to follow what the federal laws are …” “You just want to follow the law, but not our immigration law,” Tucker pressed. “Are you for the fact it is a sanctuary state by the way? … Do you think that New York should help the feds enforce immigration law?” “I think New York should be a sanctuary state,” Benjamin admitted. “No principles,” said Tucker.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 6:47:48 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/47073/democrats-renew-push-overturn-major-first-josh-hammerThis week, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) resuscitated an old Democratic Party political enemy: The First Amendment-affirming 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In Citizens United, the Court held that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment generally prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for communications by corporations, labor unions, and other similarly situated associations. The relevant statute, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, had prohibited any corporation from making an "electioneering communication" within 30 days of a primary election or within 60 days of a general election. The Citizens United decision, although well-grounded in the original understanding of the political speech-centric Free Speech Clause, has consistently been lambasted by the Left ever since it was handed down. Many on the Left criticize the "dark money" from corporations that the decision has allegedly allowed to flow out in the open. Now, Schiff wants to bring back an effort to overturn the decision via constitutional amendment. CNN reports: www.cnn.com/2019/05/08/politics/schiff-constitutional-amendment/index.htmlRep. Adam Schiff on Wednesday introduced a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, which helped usher in a new era of big money in American elections. "Our democracy is not for sale. We must stop the flood of dark money from drowning out the voices of everyday citizens," the California Democrat said in a statement on Twitter. He said such an amendment would "restore power to the American people." By a 5-4 ruling, the high court in 2010 swept aside a ban on independent spending by corporations and unions in candidate elections, saying the restrictions amounted to censorship. Outside spending in federal elections has soared from $338 million in 2008, the last presidential election before the ruling, to $1.4 billion in 2016, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. But, as Justice Kennedy held for the 5-4 Court: "The remedies enacted by law, however, must comply with the First Amendment ; and, it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule. An outright ban on corporate political speech during the critical pre-election period is not a permissible remedy. Here Congress has created categorical bans on speech that are [constitutionally impermissible]." Here is how Judge Jim Ho of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit formulated it last year in a dissent from a denial of a decision to rehear a case en banc (full disclosure: I previously served as a law clerk for Judge Ho): Under our Constitution, the people are not subjects, but citizens. As citizens, we enjoy the fundamental right to express our opinions on who does and does not belong in elected office. To be sure, many Americans of good faith bemoan the amount of money spent on campaign contributions and political speech. But if you don’t like big money in politics, then you should oppose big government in our lives. Because the former is a necessary consequence of the latter. When government grows larger, when regulators pick more and more economic winners and losers, participation in the political process ceases to be merely a citizen’s prerogative — it becomes a human necessity. This is the inevitable result of a government that would be unrecognizable to our Founders. See, e.g., NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012). So if there is too much money in politics, it’s because there’s too much government. The size and scope of government makes such spending essential. See, e.g., EMILY’s List v. FEC, 581 F.3d 1, 33 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (Brown, J., concurring) ("The more power is at stake, the more money will be used to shield, deflect, or co-opt it. So long as the government can take and redistribute a man’s livelihood, there will always be money in politics."). The Constitution has not been amended since the 27th Amendment was ratified in 1992.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 11:29:12 GMT -6
Nobody ruin the joke by telling them that abortion is still legal in every state.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 11:38:43 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/47077/jordan-peele-jj-abrams-vow-fight-georgia-over-paul-boisComedian-turned-director Jordan Peele has made a lucrative career out of exploiting America's racial divide for profit with movies like "Get Out" and episodes of "The Twilight Zone." Don't expect him to highlight the fact that more black babies are aborted in New York City than allowed born or the fact that American taxpayer dollars go to an organization founded by a racist eugenicist. www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2015/nov/25/cynthia-meyer/cynthia-meyer-says-more-black-babies-are-aborted-n/studentsforlife.org/high-school/planned-parenthood-and-racism/According to The Hollywood Reporter, Jordan Peele and director J.J. Abrams (the man who transformed "Star Wars" into a feminist empowerment vehicle) both released a statement that their HBO drama "Lovecraft County" will not be shooting in Georgia as scheduled due to the state passing a law that bans abortions after a baby's heartbeat has been detected in the mother's womb. "In a few weeks we start shooting our new show, 'Lovecraft Country' and will do so standing shoulder to shoulder with the women of Georgia," the directors said in a joint statement. "Governor Kemp's 'Fetal Heartbeat' Abortion Law is an unconstitutional effort to further restrict women and their health providers from making private medical decisions on their terms. Make no mistake, this is an attack aimed squarely and purposely at women." Abrams went on to say that his company Bad Robot and Peele's Monkeypaw Productions will be be donating funds to combat the legislation. "We stand with Stacey Abrams and the hardworking people of Georgia, and will donate 100 percent of our respective episodic fees for this season to two organizations leading the charge against this draconian law: the ACLU of Georgia and Fair Fight Georgia," he said. "We encourage those who are able to funnel any and all resources to these organizations." What is most interesting about Peele and Abrams denouncing the bill as some kind of affront to women is the fact women were the bill's primary sponsors. From LifeNews: Four of the seven major sponsors of the legislation were women including the lead sponsor in the Senate, Senator Renee Unterman. In fact Unterman called passage of the legislation in the upper chamber of the Georgia legislature the “pinnacle of her legislative career.“ Unterman told the story of having a hysterectomy when she was in her 20s. “I adopted two children and only by the courageous abilities of those birth mothers to give up those children,” she said. “That was my journey that started me on being so pro-life.” Unterman went on to slam the Hollywood elites who threatened to boycott the state because of the heartbeat bill. “We’re very proud of the movie industry,” she said. “But we have our values, and we’re going to protect our values. They knew when they came here what we are and who we are.” Jordan Peele, who recently said he would not cast a white male lead in his movies, and J.J. Abrams join alongside four production companies who announced on Thursday that they would be boycotting the state of Georgia for the same law. Christine Vachon, CEO of Killer Films, which produced films like "Vox Lux" and "First Reformed," announced that the company will "no longer consider Georgia as a viable shooting location until this ridiculous law is overturned." David Simon, who runs Blown Deadline Productions and who created "The Wire" and "The Deuce," said that he could not in good conscience ask any female under his employment to shoot in Georgia. "I can’t ask any female member of any film production with which I am involved to so marginalize themselves or compromise their inalienable authority over their own bodies. I must undertake production where the rights of all citizens remain intact," Simon said in a tweet. "Can only speak for my production company. Our comparative assessments of locations for upcoming development will pull Georgia off the list until we can be assured the health options and civil liberties of our female colleagues are unimpaired," he continued. Simultaneously, Mark Duplass of Duplass Brothers Productions urged other companies on Thursday to blackball Georgia. "Don’t give your business to Georgia," he wrote. "Will you pledge with me not to film anything in Georgia until they reverse this backwards legislation?" Later, CounterNarrative films, which produced the Netflix movie "Triple Frontier," said that it will no longer shoot in Georgia. "No Georgia filming on any of our projects until this law is gone," wrote producer Neal Dodson on Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 11, 2019 13:40:35 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/47085/confirmed-google-gives-left-wing-websites-ashe-schowCONFIRMED: Google Gives Left-Wing Websites Preference Over Conservative Ones, Audit Finds Google is one of the largest traffic drivers for news websites and, according to the Columbia Journalist Review, its influence is growing as Facebook’s traffic referrals decline. www.cjr.org/tow_center/google-news-algorithm.php“But for all the influence Google has in directing attention, we know painfully little about how its algorithm selects and curates news. Which sites does it direct traffic toward? And how does Google’s news curation impact the diversity of information found?” wrote researcher Nicholas Diakopoulos. He and fellow researcher Daniel Trielli used the Computational Journalism Lab at Northwestern University to audit the search engine’s “Top Stories” to determine what websites received the most help from Google. The team ran more than 200 search queries of various news topics in November 2017, such as “Colin Kaepernick,” “earthquake,” tax reform,” and “healthcare gov.” The researchers did everything they could to “minimize the potential for result personalization” and ran their queries each minute over a 24-hour period. The result: 6,302 unique links found in Top Stories. The researchers counted “an article impression each time one of those links appears.” (Emphasis original). “The data shows that just 20 news sources account for more than half of article impressions. The top 20 percent of sources (136 of 678) accounted for 86 percent of article impressions. And the top three accounted for 23 percent: CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post. These statistics underscore the degree of concentration of attention to a relatively narrow slice of news sources,” Diakopoulos found. Behind the Post, which accounted for 5.6% of the impressions for the top 20 sources, was Fox News, with 3%. Fox was the only outlet on the list that could be considered right-leaning. “Prior research has shown that search engines can affect users’ attitudes, shape opinions, alter perceptions and reinforce stereotypes, as well as affect how voters come to be informed during elections. As such, media diversity is an important aspect to the way that Google—or any news aggregator—curates sources and perspectives,” Diakopoulos wrote. It’s difficult to consider the other outlets – especially CNN, the Times, and the Post – as anything other than left-leaning at this point, given their coverage of President Donald Trump’s administration these past two years and their hype of the Russia-collusion hoax. The researchers then studied the ideological leanings of those who share the content from the sources in the top 20 list. As Diakopoulos wrote, this doesn’t necessarily mean the outlet itself is slanted, but reflects “the self-reported political affiliation of Facebook users sharing content from those sources.” “Our data shows that 62.4 percent of article impressions were from sources rated by that research as left-leaning, whereas 11.3 percent were from sources rated as right-leaning. 26.3 percent of impressions were from news sources that didn’t have ratings. But even if that last set of unknown impressions happened to be right-leaning, the trend would still be clear: A higher proportion of left-leaning sources appear in Top Stories. (Again this means news sources shared on Facebook more often by people with a left-leaning political affiliation,[)]” Diakopoulos wrote. The researchers also tested the theory that perhaps left-leaning outlets produce more content. They found that was the case, but also that Google’s curation algorithm amplified that skew as well. One side note to all of this, however, is that the curation may have more to do with the timeliness of the articles. The researchers found that 83.5% of articles in the Top Stories section on Google were less than 24 hours old and 13.1% were less than an hour old.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 12, 2019 6:59:31 GMT -6
amp.dailycaller.com/2019/05/10/brian-benjamin-tucker-carlson-trump-taxes-new-yorkNew York state Sen. Brian Benjamin argued for the concept of following “the law” regarding his state helping House Democrats obtain President Donald Trump’s taxes, but when Fox News host Tucker Carlson brought up cooperating with federal immigration law, it was a whole different matter. Carlson jumped right into the New York state Senate’s Wednesday passage of the TRUST Act, a bill that would facilitate the handing over of Trump’s state tax returns to Congress. “But it’s bigger than just Trump, right?” Carlson asked. “Is there anything that should be private?” Benjamin jumped into the legalese behind the congressional request, but Carlson wasn’t having it. “You want to destroy somebody because you don’t like him, right?” he asked. After a tense back-and-forth, Carlson brought up another issue to make a point. “You don’t want to help ICE keep the border secure, right? It’s a sanctuary state. But you will help the Congress pull a guy’s tax returns because you are facilitating an investigation? I mean, just be honest.” (RELATED: Tucker Asked Jorge Ramos How Many Caravan Migrants He Planned To Take In — Things Got Awkward Fast) “I wonder, is anybody going to stop lying for like 10 seconds in the last year?” Carlson continued. “Just be honest and say, I don’t like the guy. I want to destroy him. I will do whatever it takes. I see that as my job, and if that means releasing his tax returns against his wishes, I will do that.” “It’s congressional oversight over the executive branch,” said Benjamin. “If the Congress asks for his tax returns, — that is the law. All we are saying is we want to follow what the federal laws are …” “You just want to follow the law, but not our immigration law,” Tucker pressed. “Are you for the fact it is a sanctuary state by the way? … Do you think that New York should help the feds enforce immigration law?” “I think New York should be a sanctuary state,” Benjamin admitted. “No principles,” said Tucker. Although still a flaming lib this guy is a pretty good foe for Tucker. So much better than Chris Hahn.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 13, 2019 10:33:27 GMT -6
Rashida Tlaib: “There’s always kind of a calming feeling I tell folks when I think of the Holocaust, and the tragedy of the Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors — Palestinians — who lost their land and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways, have been wiped out, and some people’s passports. And just all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post-the Holocaust, post-the tragedy and the horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time. And I love the fact that it was my ancestors that provided that, right, in many ways. But they did it in a way that took their human dignity away and it was forced on them.” ......
During World War II the ‘Palestinian’ Grand Mufti met with Adolf Hitler and allied himself with the Nazis.
Called out:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 13, 2019 13:01:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 13, 2019 13:13:37 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 13, 2019 16:44:00 GMT -6
amp.dailycaller.com/2019/05/13/steny-hoyer-liz-cheney-holocaust-rashida-tlaib-donald-trumpTop House Democrats have defended Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib Monday. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer claimed Tlaib is owed an apology after members of the GOP criticized her for comments she made about the Holocaust over the weekend. “If you read Rep. Tlaib’s comments, it is clear that President Trump and Congressional Republicans are taking them out of context,” Hoyer said, according to The Hill. “They must stop, and they owe her an apology.” Speaker Pelosi echoed Hoyer’s sentiment on Twitter Monday afternoon. This most recent comment from Tlaib to spark outrage came during her appearance on Yahoo News’ “Skullduggery” podcast on Saturday. She stated: There’s always kind of a calming feeling I tell folks when I think of the Holocaust, and the tragedy of the Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors, Palestinians — who lost their land, and some lost their lives their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways — have been wiped out, and some people’s passports. And just all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post-the Holocaust, post-the tragedy and the horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time. I love the fact that it was my ancestors that provided that, right? In many ways. But they did it in a way that took their human dignity away and it was forced on them. The accuracy of Tlaib’s comments — or lack thereof — specifically in regard to Arabs providing a “safe haven” for Jews led to criticism. (RELATED: Rashida Tlaib Uses Inaccuracy To Explain Why ‘The Tragedy Of the Holocaust’ Gives Her ‘A Calming Feeling’) Muhammad Amin al-Husayni, the Palestinian Grand Mufti at the time of World War II was friendly with Adolf Hitler and helped spread anti-Semitic propaganda leading up to the Holocaust. “Democrat Rep. Tlaib is being slammed for her horrible and highly insensitive statement on the Holocaust,” Trump tweeted Monday morning. “She obviously has tremendous hatred of Israel and the Jewish people.” This was not the first time Trump has been critical of Tlaib for comments she made. The night following her swearing-in ceremony, Tlaib was taped telling supporters she would work to “impeach the motherf**ker.” At a press conference the next day, Trump claimed that she “dishonored herself and I think she’s dishonored her family.” Republican Whip Steve Scalise said in a statement: There is no justification for the twisted and disgusting comments made by Rashida Tlaib just days after the annual Day of Holocaust Remembrance. More than six million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust; there is nothing ‘calming’ about that fact. Unfortunately, this is far from the first display of heinous anti-Semitic comments coming from Democrat House members this year, and it’s clear this is now the norm for their caucus. It’s long past time for Speaker Pelosi to take swift action and make it clear that these vile comments have no place in Congress. House Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney of Wyoming tweeted on Sunday, “Surely now @speakerpelosi & @leaderhoyer will finally take action against vile anti-Semitism in their ranks. This must cross the line, even for them. Rashida Tlaib says thinking of the Holocaust provides her a ‘calming feeling.'” Following Hoyer’s demand that an apology was in order, Cheney tweeted, “I am deeply sorry for our nation that the House Democratic leadership continues to enable the anti-Semitism in their ranks.”
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 13, 2019 18:37:33 GMT -6
I listened to Levin for a little bit and he shredded her version of history.
|
|
|
Post by redrex on May 14, 2019 7:09:08 GMT -6
Looks like Anthony Weiner is out of jail-----Lets hope the registered sex offender just goes away. I think Anthony and AOC would make a great Dem power couple-----Be proud Dems
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2019 11:31:42 GMT -6
Again, Actions & Consequences:
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 14, 2019 16:56:05 GMT -6
Looks like Anthony Weiner is out of jail-----Lets hope the registered sex offender just goes away. I think Anthony and AOC would make a great Dem power couple-----Be proud Dems Just think. As I posted elsewhere think of the world under Mizz Clinton. What would Huma be? Chief of Staff? Valerie 2.0? This freak could have been inside the inner circle. No one seems to care. They talk about blackmail he seems like a pretty ripe target. And although no one has come forward I expect these couple of girls weren't the only ones. Too bad he didn't get broom raped in jail.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 14, 2019 17:03:45 GMT -6
I can barely stand to look at anything outside of sports and music any more. Shit just gives me a headache. I don't get anything on my FB concerning conservatives but it won't let me block Occupy Dems. I get some tweets but not everything I'm following. If some has 40-50 post in a day I should at least see a couple. I'm seriously thinking about just dropping all of it. I'm not going to make a difference and no one's mind will be changed. Downside is it's also how I follow music, my adoptions/rescues, and keep in touch with family. I heard someone say that Twitter is like the bathroom walls of the internet.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 15, 2019 17:45:30 GMT -6
Hollywood & Liberals meltdown over Alabama’s new Abortion law:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 15, 2019 19:31:21 GMT -6
|
|
bk2x
Quarantined
Posts: 68
|
Post by bk2x on May 15, 2019 20:38:26 GMT -6
They always reference rape and incest for abortions but that supposedly accounts for such a tiny % of the total. Most are done by irresponsible idiots.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 16, 2019 0:15:59 GMT -6
Sanctuary Cities, etc are all unconstitutional & illegal also, yet that didn’t stop those of your ilk to openly violate the rule of law: www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/05/15/reese-witherspoon-declares-heartbeat-laws-unconstitutional/amp/In a rare display of political activism, actress Reese Witherspoon took to social media on Wednesday and blasted the half-dozen states that have passed legislation outlawing abortion once a heartbeat is detected in the womb. Via Twitter, Witherspoon described the “new abortion bans” as “unconstitutional,” “abhorrent,” and “an attack on women’s fundamental rights.” I’m beyond upset about the passing of new abortion bans in Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Georgia, and Ohio,” the Big Little Lies star said. “This is Unconstitutional and Abhorrent. We can not tolerate this attack on women’s fundamental rights.” Witherspoon has previously described herself as a “feminist,” characterizing feminism as a movement pursuing “equality” between the sexes. Assorted Hollywood leftists echoed Witherspoon’s opposition to the aforementioned new state restrictions on abortion, including singer John Legend, film director Ava Duvernay, actor Chris Evans, singer and actress Lady Gaga, and Hamilton playright Lin-Manuel Miranda, comedienne Sarah Silverman, and others. ABC’s Joy Behar highlighted the race of Alabama state senators who voted for a bill to ban abortions after detection of a fetal heartbeat. “Can we look at a picture of the panel of men who did this? There it is. Gee, what do they have in common? They’re all men, all white guys,” Behar said, adding, “Maybe we should make it a law that they should all be required to get a vasectomy, that group in particular.”
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on May 16, 2019 8:27:24 GMT -6
A quick scan of the MSM last night showed a collective losing of the minds. Funny how it's never a problem in places like Cali and NY when people's rights are trampled upon.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 17, 2019 7:08:09 GMT -6
|
|