|
Post by trumped on May 28, 2018 18:00:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 28, 2018 18:02:14 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 29, 2018 14:25:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on May 29, 2018 19:01:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 31, 2018 12:43:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 4, 2018 16:30:02 GMT -6
Blue waves are crashing
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 5, 2018 10:13:19 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 5, 2018 10:13:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 5, 2018 17:27:45 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jun 6, 2018 6:37:00 GMT -6
Funny how McConnell does this now since he has been the problem the entire time...once again Breitbart calling these Senators conservatives lol...hell Cassidy, Heller, Kennedy, Rounds, Sullivan, Tillis, and Wicker should be democrats based on their voting record...Ernst, Fischer, and Johnson are close to being democrats...Lankford, Perdue, and Daines are slipping so that leaves Sasse, Cruz, and Lee as real conservatives based on their voting record...3 of 16...nothing will ever change with those numbers... www.conservativereview.com/scorecard/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/05/conservative-senators-take-victory-lap-mcconnell-cancels-summer-recess/Conservative Senators Take Victory Lap as Mitch McConnell Cancels Summer Recess Sen. David Perdue 68% (R-GA) spearheaded the letter, which was also signed by Sens. Bill Cassidy 48% (R-LA), Ted Cruz 90% (R-TX), Steve Daines 79% (R-MT), Joni Ernst 66% (R-IA), Deb Fischer 62% (R-NE), Dean Heller 54% (R-NV), Ron Johnson 62% (R-WI), John Kennedy 58% (R-LA), James Lankford 72% (R-OK), Mike Lee 100% (R-UT), Mike Rounds 31% (R-SD), Ben Sasse 93%(R-NE), Dan Sullivan 56% (R-AK), Thom Tillis 38% (R-NC), and Roger Wicker 34% (R-MS)
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 9:48:12 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 12:51:31 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jun 6, 2018 13:22:31 GMT -6
I know everyone thinks Devin Nunes is great based on his kabuki theater but his liberty score is 36% which would make him a Dem through his votes...out of 50 votes he has voted liberal 30 times...unfortunately he is part of the problem by his actions...his record is the same as Kevin McCarthy who wants to be speaker...McCarthy voted liberal on 32 of 50 votes...never get anywhere with people like this... pdfgenerator.conservativereview.com/pdf/400297.pdf#page=1
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 13:36:51 GMT -6
I don’t disagree but sometimes where you are from matters. Cali has really went radical leftist and a far right Pub won’t get elected. He has to balance the far left and keeping enough of his base to stay in office. If he ventures too far right of where has been then a far leftist gets in office and its much worse.
At least he has been a hero of rooting out the criminals in his position. He has fought some entrenched deep state criminals and not caved. That alone gets him my support.
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jun 6, 2018 14:11:04 GMT -6
I don’t disagree but sometimes where you are from matters. Cali has really went radical leftist and a far right Pub won’t get elected. He has to balance the far left and keeping enough of his base to stay in office. If he ventures too far right of where has been then a far leftist gets in office and its much worse. At least he has been a hero of rooting out the criminals in his position. He has fought some entrenched deep state criminals and not caved. That alone gets him my support. Cali is gone and we will never win it again...so we should allow liberal Pubs from a state we will never ever win to be speaker of the house? Seems completely ridiculous to me...their actions (votes) are the reason this country is so f'd up and their votes are liberal a majority of the time...he has had some great kabuki theater but he still votes liberal...pretty easy to see...might as well elect a Dem as they will have the same voting record where these guys purport to be something they are not...see my logic?
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 15:23:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 15:25:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 6, 2018 19:40:09 GMT -6
Lol Also, the CA “jungle primary system, which can result in only D’s on the general election ballot - and usually does, is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard of. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 6, 2018 22:45:37 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 8, 2018 16:37:47 GMT -6
Wow if true:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 9, 2018 5:32:58 GMT -6
DNC changing rules for their Presidential nominations: thehill.com/homenews/campaign/391459-dnc-panel-adopts-rule-requiring-candidates-to-run-serve-as-a-democrat?ampDNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat ...... The Democratic National Committee (DNC) adopted a new rule on Friday aimed at keeping outsider candidates like Bernie Sanders from trying to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. The new rule, adopted by the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, requires all Democratic presidential candidates to be a member of the Democratic Party, Yahoo News reported. A presidential candidate running for the Democratic nomination must be a member of the party, accept the Democratic nomination and "run and serve" as a member. Sanders, who has maintained his status as an Independent, fought a tough primary race for the Democratic nomination against eventual Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 9, 2018 6:07:07 GMT -6
DNC changing rules for their Presidential nominations: thehill.com/homenews/campaign/391459-dnc-panel-adopts-rule-requiring-candidates-to-run-serve-as-a-democrat?ampDNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat ...... The Democratic National Committee (DNC) adopted a new rule on Friday aimed at keeping outsider candidates like Bernie Sanders from trying to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. The new rule, adopted by the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, requires all Democratic presidential candidates to be a member of the Democratic Party, Yahoo News reported. A presidential candidate running for the Democratic nomination must be a member of the party, accept the Democratic nomination and "run and serve" as a member. Sanders, who has maintained his status as an Independent, fought a tough primary race for the Democratic nomination against eventual Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016. I actually support the more main stream dems trying to fight off the progressives, which I think is what this is. I’d like to see four parties created out of the Revolution of 2016: the Bernouts, the DNC, the GOP, and the America First Party. If it wasn’t about money, it would have happened already... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by kingswitz on Jun 9, 2018 6:26:30 GMT -6
DNC changing rules for their Presidential nominations: thehill.com/homenews/campaign/391459-dnc-panel-adopts-rule-requiring-candidates-to-run-serve-as-a-democrat?ampDNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat ...... The Democratic National Committee (DNC) adopted a new rule on Friday aimed at keeping outsider candidates like Bernie Sanders from trying to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. The new rule, adopted by the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, requires all Democratic presidential candidates to be a member of the Democratic Party, Yahoo News reported. A presidential candidate running for the Democratic nomination must be a member of the party, accept the Democratic nomination and "run and serve" as a member. Sanders, who has maintained his status as an Independent, fought a tough primary race for the Democratic nomination against eventual Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016. I actually support the more main stream dems trying to fight off the progressives, which I think is what this is. I’d like to see four parties created out of the Revolution of 2016: the Bernouts, the DNC, the GOP, and the America First Party. If it wasn’t about money, it would have happened already... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Looks like the Socialist Bernie Faction is done for the 2020 election. No way he’ll garner as much interest as an Independent.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 9, 2018 8:03:24 GMT -6
I actually support the more main stream dems trying to fight off the progressives, which I think is what this is. I’d like to see four parties created out of the Revolution of 2016: the Bernouts, the DNC, the GOP, and the America First Party. If it wasn’t about money, it would have happened already... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Looks like the Socialist Bernie Faction is done for the 2020 election. No way he’ll garner as much interest as an Independent. No doubt. The Elite use the two party system against us. Some of these truths are so self evident, that alone shows us how firm a grasp The Elite has over us. Bernouts, Trumpers, and anyone not a GOP or Dem company man knows that those at the top use the two party system to marginalize the voice of the people. Its the reason Bernie had to run as a Dem, then why the primaries were rigged against him. Its the reason Trump ran as GOP, when that same GOP worked to funnel the required delegate votes against him, and many major party leaders refused to even attend the convention. Yet, these two outsiders were clearly extremely popular among masses of people. Why is that? Why do we know that this two party system exists, know it marginalizes clearly popular candidates, then allow it to continue in an otherwise democratically ideological society? Divide and Conquer. That's why. The Elites use the Divide and Conquer strategy so effectively that we focus on tertiary issues, like economic indicators, wedding cakes, and kneeling (or Russia, Fascism!, and Personalities), instead of the more overarching fact that, ultimately, the views of the People result in little respective change. The reality is that the Elites set the direction, then we follow. The blinders levied via the Divide and Conquer strategy ensure the Trumper's don't see that the Bernie supporters right next to them actually have common pursuits, and more importantly, the means to remove one another's blinders. Its clearly a very effective system, but it is not democracy. Democracy by Proxy, maybe...
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jun 9, 2018 8:26:15 GMT -6
DNC changing rules for their Presidential nominations: thehill.com/homenews/campaign/391459-dnc-panel-adopts-rule-requiring-candidates-to-run-serve-as-a-democrat?ampDNC panel adopts rule requiring candidates to run, serve as a Democrat ...... The Democratic National Committee (DNC) adopted a new rule on Friday aimed at keeping outsider candidates like Bernie Sanders from trying to clinch the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. The new rule, adopted by the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, requires all Democratic presidential candidates to be a member of the Democratic Party, Yahoo News reported. A presidential candidate running for the Democratic nomination must be a member of the party, accept the Democratic nomination and "run and serve" as a member. Sanders, who has maintained his status as an Independent, fought a tough primary race for the Democratic nomination against eventual Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016. I actually support the more main stream dems trying to fight off the progressives, which I think is what this is. I’d like to see four parties created out of the Revolution of 2016: the Bernouts, the DNC, the GOP, and the America First Party. If it wasn’t about money, it would have happened already... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Who and what is a mainstream Dem? Do they support states rights? Substantially decreasing the size and scope of the federal government? If they don't they are the enemy...
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 9, 2018 8:45:14 GMT -6
I actually support the more main stream dems trying to fight off the progressives, which I think is what this is. I’d like to see four parties created out of the Revolution of 2016: the Bernouts, the DNC, the GOP, and the America First Party. If it wasn’t about money, it would have happened already... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Who and what is a mainstream Dem? Do they support states rights? Substantially decreasing the size and scope of the federal government? If they don't they are the enemy... Mainstream Dems are, by definition, those Dems with views falling within the bell curve, or normal distribution. Do you think the chameleon like quality of politicians of both parties has had any effect, over time, on your polarized positions? Do you think that is/was intentional?
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 9, 2018 15:06:43 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jun 9, 2018 19:33:50 GMT -6
Who and what is a mainstream Dem? Do they support states rights? Substantially decreasing the size and scope of the federal government? If they don't they are the enemy... Mainstream Dems are, by definition, those Dems with views falling within the bell curve, or normal distribution. Do you think the chameleon like quality of politicians of both parties has had any effect, over time, on your polarized positions? Do you think that is/was intentional? What? Not really sure what you mean? If anyone isn't for states rights as was intended in the constitution and for substantially decreasing the size and scope of the federal government to get back to that then they are certainly not a friend of America...would you agree?
|
|
|
Post by stinger1066 on Jun 10, 2018 4:06:44 GMT -6
Looks like the Socialist Bernie Faction is done for the 2020 election. No way he’ll garner as much interest as an Independent. No doubt. The Elite use the two party system against us. Some of these truths are so self evident, that alone shows us how firm a grasp The Elite has over us. Bernouts, Trumpers, and anyone not a GOP or Dem company man knows that those at the top use the two party system to marginalize the voice of the people. Its the reason Bernie had to run as a Dem, then why the primaries were rigged against him. Its the reason Trump ran as GOP, when that same GOP worked to funnel the required delegate votes against him, and many major party leaders refused to even attend the convention. Yet, these two outsiders were clearly extremely popular among masses of people. Why is that? Why do we know that this two party system exists, know it marginalizes clearly popular candidates, then allow it to continue in an otherwise democratically ideological society? Divide and Conquer. That's why. The Elites use the Divide and Conquer strategy so effectively that we focus on tertiary issues, like economic indicators, wedding cakes, and kneeling (or Russia, Fascism!, and Personalities), instead of the more overarching fact that, ultimately, the views of the People result in little respective change. The reality is that the Elites set the direction, then we follow. The blinders levied via the Divide and Conquer strategy ensure the Trumper's don't see that the Bernie supporters right next to them actually have common pursuits, and more importantly, the means to remove one another's blinders. Its clearly a very effective system, but it is not democracy. Democracy by Proxy, maybe... Remember how the Republican party elite treated Ron Paul and his followers in 2012? He and his followers scared the shit out of them, and they did everything they could to undermine him. Very similar to what the DNC did to Bernie Sanders.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 10, 2018 12:47:03 GMT -6
|
|