|
Post by principledcon on Jul 4, 2018 6:20:55 GMT -6
Mike Lee would be my choice and the best choice from his call list....
|
|
|
Post by stinger1066 on Jul 4, 2018 7:45:06 GMT -6
Mike Lee would be my choice and the best choice from his call list.... Agreed
|
|
|
Post by #winning on Jul 4, 2018 11:50:09 GMT -6
Mike Lee would be my choice and the best choice from his call list.... So if he were to be nominated wouldn't that take away a GOP vote? And it would also take away a possible Senate seat. We saw how well the disaster of Sessions at the DOJ worked out for Alabama. Utah is already, unfortunately, going to give us Sen Mittenz. That's bad enough.
|
|
|
Post by aquariumdrinker on Jul 4, 2018 22:59:09 GMT -6
double post.
|
|
|
Post by aquariumdrinker on Jul 4, 2018 23:07:05 GMT -6
You're a terrible human being. I hope you know that. I resisted posting/registering on this site, but this meme...it's the epitome of what's wrong with our politics today. You embody that. Congratulations. I'm confident that in the upcoming elections, my side will remind those of what it means to be an American. But until that time, since it's an "election year," we have to delay the SC vote until the American people have a say (thanks, Mitch).
|
|
|
Post by okie52 on Jul 5, 2018 9:34:05 GMT -6
You're a terrible human being. I hope you know that. I resisted posting/registering on this site, but this meme...it's the epitome of what's wrong with our politics today. You embody that. Congratulations. I'm confident that in the upcoming elections, my side will remind those of what it means to be an American. But until that time, since it's an "election year," we have to delay the SC vote until the American people have a say (thanks, Mitch). That got you all worked up aquariumdrinker? Smart Call: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Been Dead On The Supreme Court Bench For 3 Months, But Democrats Are Febrezing Her Every Day In Hopes That No One Notices
news.clickhole.com/smart-call-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-been-dead-on-the-su-1825122480
|
|
|
Post by #winning on Jul 5, 2018 10:25:12 GMT -6
You're a terrible human being. I hope you know that. I resisted posting/registering on this site, but this meme...it's the epitome of what's wrong with our politics today. You embody that. Congratulations. I'm confident that in the upcoming elections, my side will remind those of what it means to be an American. But until that time, since it's an "election year," we have to delay the SC vote until the American people have a say (thanks, Mitch). All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post.
|
|
|
Post by stinger1066 on Jul 5, 2018 11:00:53 GMT -6
You're a terrible human being. I hope you know that. I resisted posting/registering on this site, but this meme...it's the epitome of what's wrong with our politics today. You embody that. Congratulations. I'm confident that in the upcoming elections, my side will remind those of what it means to be an American. But until that time, since it's an "election year," we have to delay the SC vote until the American people have a say (thanks, Mitch). I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. Don't be such a Soy Boy. Get signed up!
|
|
|
Post by aquariumdrinker on Jul 5, 2018 14:30:29 GMT -6
You're a terrible human being. I hope you know that. I resisted posting/registering on this site, but this meme...it's the epitome of what's wrong with our politics today. You embody that. Congratulations. I'm confident that in the upcoming elections, my side will remind those of what it means to be an American. But until that time, since it's an "election year," we have to delay the SC vote until the American people have a say (thanks, Mitch). All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench.
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jul 5, 2018 14:49:57 GMT -6
All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench. Does the president proclaim to be righteous? He gets things done, and for some, that's enough. Did you not hear what Peter Fonda had to say about the head of DHS who is a female? Besides closing their eyes, laying their hands over the ears, and doing their best impression of Sargent Schultz what was the response of the "Me Too Movement." There was none because being silence was the convenient thing to do. You see anyone who uses convenience to define righteousness is no more than an asswipe and this defines most liberals because their collective outrage is for appearance, it is for show, for show! So, stop with your weak indignation. A person is either successful or they are not. If a person runs a red light and t-bones a family member of yours what does it matter what their personality traits are? Does it matter if they are an ass of a person or the most personable person? I don't see the relevance here and this is the way life works. If an individual needs a brake job badly should they choose the mechanic who can make the repair with his eyes closed, but is an ass of a man, or rather take the car to a mechanic who is overflowing with character but couldn't make a solid repair to save his life. When the brakes fail and that driver's life is going down the shitter it sure helps to know the mechanic was a sweet and gentle man.
|
|
|
Post by redstripe on Jul 5, 2018 15:23:10 GMT -6
All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench. Obviously someone put a pube on your coke can
|
|
|
Post by xingtherubicon on Jul 5, 2018 16:08:58 GMT -6
If you don't like what's happening with the SC chicanery, look inward dems...you taught everyone how to be sniveling little cunts when you were in power.
Now, do I like the pubs bending the rules now? No. I'm a rules guy.
But, turnabout is fair play.
In summation....
Eat shit.
|
|
|
Post by #winning on Jul 5, 2018 17:48:47 GMT -6
so much #whining. I mean #winning. Well both.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 5, 2018 19:47:45 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 5, 2018 19:52:26 GMT -6
All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench. Judge Robert Bork says hi,(as Kennedy insured he would not be voted in by going with the fear route and played politics to insure he would fall short of the votes for a more “moderate “Justice).
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jul 5, 2018 20:14:26 GMT -6
Mike Lee would be my choice and the best choice from his call list.... So if he were to be nominated wouldn't that take away a GOP vote? And it would also take away a possible Senate seat. We saw how well the disaster of Sessions at the DOJ worked out for Alabama. Utah is already, unfortunately, going to give us Sen Mittenz. That's bad enough. Lee is a known strict constructionist and real conservative...Sessions was always a bad choice as he is establishment and that was also known...the Senate is already broken beyond repair because of the change in how they are chosen, McConnell, and the filibuster rule...you can thank McConnell and Hatch for Romney...
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jul 6, 2018 0:36:40 GMT -6
Judge Robert Bork says hi,(as Kennedy insured he would not be voted in by going with the fear route and played politics to insure he would fall short of the votes for a more “moderate “Justice). I heard a good take today. Had the left not Borked Bork he would have taken the seat given to Kennedy. Bork died in 2012 and would have been filled by a liberal so the left has only themselves to blame for this seat going to a constitutionalist.
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 6, 2018 8:14:39 GMT -6
Judge Robert Bork says hi,(as Kennedy insured he would not be voted in by going with the fear route and played politics to insure he would fall short of the votes for a more “moderate “Justice). I heard a good take today. Had the left not Borked Bork he would have taken the seat given to Kennedy. Bork died in 2012 and would have been filled by a liberal so the left has only themselves to blame for this seat going to a constitutionalist. Damn straight...the Dems started this shit with Bork! Now, they have to live with the consequences...FUCK' EM!!!
|
|
|
Post by okie52 on Jul 6, 2018 16:56:28 GMT -6
All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench. So aquarium...what are the policy mandates that are “unfair”?
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jul 6, 2018 17:04:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by okie52 on Jul 6, 2018 20:55:04 GMT -6
Well let’s hope Trump and the senate will make sure he isn’t the appointee.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 7, 2018 10:36:31 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/video/2018/07/07/trump-my-responsibility-is-to-select-a-justice-who-will-faithfully-interpret-the-constitution-as-written/52 During Friday’s Weekly Address, President Trump said that in picking a replacement for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, “my greatest responsibility is to select a justice who will faithfully interpret the Constitution as written.” He added, “Judges are not supposed to re-write the law, re-invent the Constitution, or substitute their own opinions for the will of the people expressed through their laws.” Transcript as Follows: “One of the most important decisions a president will ever make is the decision to nominate a justice to the United States Supreme Court. Last week, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his decision to take senior status. I was greatly honored when Justice Kennedy came to the White House to meet with me. America is truly grateful for Justice Kennedy’s lifetime of distinguished service. He has given me a great responsibility to choose a worthy successor. Last year, I was proud to appoint Justice Kennedy’s former law clerk, Neil Gorsuch, to the Supreme Court. Over the last year, Justice Gorsuch has embodied the most sacred principles of the court, making impartial decisions based upon the Constitution. In choosing Justice Kennedy’s replacement, my greatest responsibility is to select a justice who will faithfully interpret the Constitution as written. Judges are not supposed to re-write the law, re-invent the Constitution, or substitute their own opinions for the will of the people expressed through their laws. We reject judicial activism and policymaking from the bench. The faithful application of the Constitution is the bedrock of our freedom, the foundation of our society, and the linchpin of our government. The American system tasks Congress with writing the laws, the executive with enforcing the laws, and the judiciary with issuing neutral judgments based upon those laws and the Constitution we have sworn to protect. In choosing a new justice, I will select someone with impeccable credentials, great intellect, unbiased judgment, and deep reverence for the laws and Constitution of the United States. I look forward to making an announcement soon so that we can further strengthen and protect liberty and justice for all. Thank you, and God Bless America.”
|
|
|
Post by soonerpt on Jul 7, 2018 16:39:15 GMT -6
All the hate and lying coming from the left and this is what's wrong with politics today? Try paying attention. Your side has nothing to offer but vile, ignorant, empty rhetoric. Nothing to add as far as policy or ideas. End ICE. End borders. End profits. Blah, blah, blah. And, thank you for proving you know nothing. Your hero, Handsy Joe, is the one to thank for McConnell not voting on SCOTUS in 2016. During a presidential election. Just ask Clinton and Obama. I'm sure you didn't object to it then. And had Hillary? Crickets. As usual lots of noise but nothing to add. I resist joining this site because of moronic drivel like your post. "All the hate and lying coming from the left." Hilarious. It might be time for you to do a little self-reflection and re-read some of those presidential tweets, or policy mandates from the current administration. Action, outrage, whatever, from the left is not baseless. It's a direct result of the steps taken by your God Emperor. I'm aware of the Biden rule, but remind me again what Supreme Court vacancy he was advocating to delay filling during a presidential election? Your side refused to give Garland a hearing...for nine months. The seat sat empty for a year, and then was filled by the least popular president in a century - someone who lost the popular vote by 3 million. Don't lecture me on political norms, because your side has rejected them outright. There's no crying foul now. FYI, even though Biden wasn't necessarily wrong in the now infamous instance you reference, he wasn't without sin on the Senate Judicial Committee. After all, he's likely the reason we have Clarence Thomas on the bench. Come on dude you can do better than that, find out where he lives, works and harass him like the good little leftist sheep that you are
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jul 8, 2018 5:29:16 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by principledcon on Jul 8, 2018 5:39:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by stinger1066 on Jul 8, 2018 8:55:15 GMT -6
Face the Nation reporting that Kethledge is the most likely pick.
|
|
|
Post by heff on Jul 8, 2018 13:16:39 GMT -6
I called the OK senators and voiced my disapproval last week.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 8, 2018 17:24:04 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 9, 2018 16:56:25 GMT -6
Schumer warning Red State Democrat Senators: www.dailywire.com/news/32773/sen-chuck-schumer-threatens-red-state-dems-vote-emily-zanotti?ampPresident Donald Trump is set to reveal his Supreme Court pick Monday night, but Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is already warning Senate Democrats that they can kiss his support goodbye if they cross the aisle and vote to confirm Trump's nominee. Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) both face tough re-election campaigns as "moderate" Democrats in states Donald Trump won in the 2016 presidential election and both crossed the aisle to confirm Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. With Republicans well aware that they could lose two "moderates" in their own ranks, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), the GOP has, no doubt, been reaching out to both Manchin and Heitkamp. To combat their influence, Schumer is reportedly putting the screws on his flight-risk caucus members, warning them that they may not get help in tight Congressional races if they abandon the party to confirm a Trump pick. Schumer, in turn, has found himself under pressure from the Left to block Trump's SCOTUS nominee. “The message from grassroots groups is pretty clear: that if Democratic leadership can keep their caucus unified in doing no harm, we can aim our firepower on Republicans like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski and bring full pressure to bear in their states,” one progressive activist told Politico. There aren't many options left for the Senate minority leader, however. Thanks to retired Senator Harry Reid, the Republicans are armed with the "nuclear option" and need only a simple majority — which they have if their entire caucus stays together — to put anyone Trump selects on the bench. Schumer made one last-ditch effort to ask President Trump to nominate Merrick Garland — the abandoned Supreme Court nominee from former President Barack Obama's final months — but the idea was met with immediate scorn.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 9, 2018 17:04:42 GMT -6
John Roberts ✔ @johnrobertsfox WH says 5 Democrats were invited to @realdonaldtrump SCOTUS reveal: Feinstein, Manchin, Donnelly, Heitkamp and Jones. All sent regrets 5:53 PM - Jul 9, 2018
1,370
960 people are talking about this
|
|