|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 14:40:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 14:48:42 GMT -6
www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-21/truth-was-irrelevant-wsj-asks-was-brennans-action-real-treasonAnd once again Kimberley Strassel - who by now has become the focus of social media attacks for her truth-seeking reporting - does it again this morning, as she points out - after his 'treasonous' outbursts, that Obama's CIA Director John Brennan acknowledges that it was him egging on the FBI's probe of Trump and Russia. www.wsj.com/articles/brennan-and-the-2016-spy-scandal-1532039346Via The Wall Street Journal, The Trump-Russia sleuthers have been back in the news, again giving Americans cause to doubt their claims of nonpartisanship. Last week it was Federal Bureau of Investigation agent Peter Strzok testifying to Congress that he harbored no bias against a president he still describes as “horrible” and “disgusting.” This week it was former FBI Director Jim Comey tweet-lecturing Americans on their duty to vote Democratic in November. But the man who deserves a belated bit of scrutiny is former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan. He’s accused President Trump of “venality, moral turpitude and political corruption,” and berated GOP investigations of the FBI. This week he claimed on Twitter that Mr. Trump’s press conference in Helsinki was “nothing short of treasonous.” This is rough stuff, even for an Obama partisan. That’s what Mr. Brennan is—a partisan—and it is why his role in the 2016 scandal is in some ways more concerning than the FBI’s. Mr. Comey stands accused of flouting the rules, breaking the chain of command, abusing investigatory powers. Yet it seems far likelier that the FBI’s Trump investigation was a function of arrogance and overconfidence than some partisan plot. No such case can be made for Mr. Brennan. Before his nomination as CIA director, he served as a close Obama adviser. And the record shows he went on to use his position—as head of the most powerful spy agency in the world—to assist Hillary Clinton’s campaign (and keep his job). Mr. Brennan has taken credit for launching the Trump investigation. At a House Intelligence Committee hearing in May 2017, he explained that he became “aware of intelligence and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons.” The CIA can’t investigate U.S. citizens, but he made sure that “every information and bit of intelligence” was “shared with the bureau,” meaning the FBI. This information, he said, “served as the basis for the FBI investigation.” My sources suggest Mr. Brennan was overstating his initial role, but either way, by his own testimony, he was an Obama-Clinton partisan was pushing information to the FBI and pressuring it to act. More notable, Mr. Brennan then took the lead on shaping the narrative that Russia was interfering in the election specifically to help Mr. Trump - which quickly evolved into the Trump-collusion narrative. Team Clinton was eager to make the claim, especially in light of the Democratic National Committee server hack. Numerous reports show Mr. Brennan aggressively pushing the same line internally. Their problem was that as of July 2016 even then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper didn’t buy it. He publicly refused to say who was responsible for the hack, or ascribe motivation. Mr. Brennan also couldn’t get the FBI to sign on to the view; the bureau continued to believe Russian cyberattacks were aimed at disrupting the U.S. political system generally, not aiding Mr. Trump. The CIA director couldn’t himself go public with his Clinton spin—he lacked the support of the intelligence community and had to be careful not to be seen interfering in U.S. politics. So what to do? He called Harry Reid. In a late August briefing, he told the Senate minority leader that Russia was trying to help Mr. Trump win the election, and that Trump advisers might be colluding with Russia. (Two years later, no public evidence has emerged to support such a claim.) But the truth was irrelevant. On cue, within a few days of the briefing, Mr. Reid wrote a letter to Mr. Comey, which of course immediately became public. “The evidence of a direct connection between the Russian government and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign continues to mount,” wrote Mr. Reid, going on to float Team Clinton’s Russians-are-helping-Trump theory. Mr. Reid publicly divulged at least one of the allegations contained in the infamous Steele dossier, insisting that the FBI use “every resource available to investigate this matter.” The Reid letter marked the first official blast of the Brennan-Clinton collusion narrative into the open. Clinton opposition-research firm Fusion GPS followed up by briefing its media allies about the dossier it had dropped off at the FBI. On Sept. 23, Yahoo News’s Michael Isikoff ran the headline: “U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin.” Voilà. Not only was the collusion narrative out there, but so was evidence that the FBI was investigating. In their recent book “Russian Roulette,” Mr. Isikoff and David Corn say even Mr. Reid believed Mr. Brennan had an “ulterior motive” with the briefing, and “concluded the CIA chief believed the public needed to know about the Russia operation, including the information about the possible links to the Trump campaign.” (Brennan allies have denied his aim was to leak damaging information.) Clinton supporters have a plausible case that Mr. Comey’s late-October announcement that the FBI had reopened its investigation into the candidate affected the election. But Trump supporters have a claim that the public outing of the collusion narrative and FBI investigation took a toll on their candidate.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 20:43:32 GMT -6
Strozk caught perjuring himself: Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Newly released FISA application shows Strzok did in fact use Carter Page's Sept. 2016 letter to Comey as a “pretext” to open investigation on him, as Strzok suggested in email to Page in Sept re "Crossfire FISA." Yet Strzok just swore he had nothing to do with Page FISA 8:25 PM - Jul 21, 2018 1,282 1,019 people are talking about this Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Over and over, the newly released FISA app on Carter Page reveals the FBI cited liberal media articles, along with the Clinton-paid political dossier, as EVIDENCE to support the warrant to spy on Page, and by extension, the Trump campaign 8:28 PM - Jul 21, 2018 2,699 1,697 people are talking about this And the main rub: Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Newly declassified FISA application on Carter Page reveals FBI never told the court that its main source -- Steele -- was paid through the Clinton campaign. It merely says he was hired by a "business associate" and a "law firm," which it never ID's as Clinton/DNC lawyer 8:48 PM - Jul 21, 2018 1,762 1,442 people are talking about this Click here to see the Carter Page FISA documents: www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-fisa-warrant-docs-00245/
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jul 21, 2018 20:47:12 GMT -6
Strozk caught perjuring himself: Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Newly released FISA application shows Strzok did in fact use Carter Page's Sept. 2016 letter to Comey as a “pretext” to open investigation on him, as Strzok suggested in email to Page in Sept re "Crossfire FISA." Yet Strzok just swore he had nothing to do with Page FISA 8:25 PM - Jul 21, 2018 1,282 1,019 people are talking about this Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Over and over, the newly released FISA app on Carter Page reveals the FBI cited liberal media articles, along with the Clinton-paid political dossier, as EVIDENCE to support the warrant to spy on Page, and by extension, the Trump campaign 8:28 PM - Jul 21, 2018 2,699 1,697 people are talking about this And the main rub: Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Newly declassified FISA application on Carter Page reveals FBI never told the court that its main source -- Steele -- was paid through the Clinton campaign. It merely says he was hired by a "business associate" and a "law firm," which it never ID's as Clinton/DNC lawyer 8:48 PM - Jul 21, 2018 1,762 1,442 people are talking about this Click here to see the Carter Page FISA documents: www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-fisa-warrant-docs-00245/Does he really need to purger himself at this point? I mean, what a douche bag. But, I guess this helps. These fuckers denying a deep state while fucking Strzok is deposed. I mean really? Get the fuck out. Proof. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 22:06:04 GMT -6
Mark Meadows ✔ @repmarkmeadows Potentially groundbreaking development here. The Carter Page FISA docs should be declassified and further unredacted (protecting only sources and methods) so Americans can know the truth.
If the previous admin was funneling campaign research toward surveillance, we need to know.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 22:07:10 GMT -6
Conversation Paul Sperry Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: The applications filed to renew the Carter Page FISA simply recycle the old Steele/Yahoo information from the original application,even tho renewals by law must present compelling new information obtained from monitoring to justify extending surveillance another 90 days 10:32 PM · Jul 21, 2018 546 Retweets 721 Likes
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 21, 2018 22:11:04 GMT -6
Conversation Paul Sperry Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ CONFIRMED: YOU READ IT HERE FIRST (March 1, 2018) ... Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ DEVELOPING: US Judge Anne C. Conway and US Judge Raymond J. Dearie among the 4 FISA court judges who rubber-stamped illegal FISA surveillance warrants signed by Comey, McCabe and Yates to spy on Trump campaign 8:19 PM · Jul 21, 2018 618 Retweets 784 Likes
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 7:48:26 GMT -6
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realdonaldtrump Looking more & more like the Trump Campaign for President was illegally being spied upon (surveillance) for the political gain of Crooked Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Ask her how that worked out - she did better with Crazy Bernie. Republicans must get tough now. An illegal Scam! 6:49 AM - Jul 22, 2018
45.3K
29.1K people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 7:49:54 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 7:50:42 GMT -6
Evon @evons777 According to Obama’s former spy chief, James Clapper, who appeared on CNN to say it was Obama who set the entire Russia witch-hunt into motion by tasking the intelligence community assessment.https://truthfeednews.com/shock-video-clapper-just-screwed-up-and-revealed-the-truth-on-live-television/ … Watch the video:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 7:58:02 GMT -6
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ ALERT: The declassified FBI warrant application attests to secret FISA court that "THE FBI LEARNED that Page met with at least two Russian officials during the trip,"as if FBI learned this independently,when in fact it's clear it relied on Clinton-paid dossier for the information 9:15 PM - Jul 21, 2018
1,529
1,073 people are talking about this .....
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: FBI's FISA warrant actually cites as "evidence" to spy on Carter Page/Trump campaign "Senate Minority Leader" Harry Reid's 2016 letter to Comey citing information he got from John Brennan who got it from the Clinton dossier -- talk about circular evidence! 9:33 PM - Jul 21, 2018
7,209
5,126 people are talking about this ......
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:28:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:31:55 GMT -6
Conversation Paul Sperry Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: In all the FISA apps filed to spy on Trump advisor Page there is no evidentiary source listed other than "Source #1" -- and "Source #1" is Christopher Steele. (There is no Source #2 or Source #3, etc. Just a single source -- Source #1.) 10:26 PM · Jul 21, 2018 2.4K Retweets 3.4K Likes
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:35:07 GMT -6
Techno Fog Techno Fog @techno_Fog FBI/DOJ telling the FISA court that Source 1 (Christopher Steele) did not "directly provide" information to reporter Isikoff. It turns out that this was 100% false. Steele was the source. They lied to the FISA court.
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 10:41:20 GMT -6
Follow the sequence of events.
1. Hillary pays for dossier
2. Dossier kicks off Obama ordered intelligence assessment (so important to democracy, Trump was never told of it)
3. Dossier serves as basis for FISA surveillance of Trump campaign and unmasking rates skyrocket
4. Hillary starts to speak of Trump-Russian ties in the middle of the campaign
5. Trump wins unexpectedly
6. Democrats blame Hillary loss on Russia swaying the election
7. Comey records meeting with Trump in the hopes of kicking off special counsel
8. Special Counsel appointed without Trump knowledge
9. Special Counsel finds no history or evidence of any collusion
10. Democrats switch to implications, innuendo and rumor of Putin "having something on" Trump
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:41:52 GMT -6
Marco Rubio on DOJ, FISA, etc www.breitbart.com/video/2018/07/22/rubio-doj-fbi-did-not-do-anything-wrong-with-carter-page-surveillance/Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said the Department of Justice and FBI did nothing “wrong” while obtaining the FISA warrants for surveillance of former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Rubio said, “I don’t believe that them looking into Carter Page means they were spying on the campaign. I also don’t believe it proves anything about collusion or anything like that. I think Carter Page is one of these guys, we never would have heard of him before all this, but that was on their screen even before the campaign.” ........ Apologies, but if he is onboard with falsifying evidence, lying to judges, etc just to get at a President that he personally does not like, then that speaks volumes about his character, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 10:42:00 GMT -6
Techno Fog Techno Fog @techno_Fog FBI/DOJ telling the FISA court that Source 1 (Christopher Steele) did not "directly provide" information to reporter Isikoff. It turns out that this was 100% false. Steele was the source. They lied to the FISA court. YES SIR
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:44:09 GMT -6
Follow the sequence of events. 1. Hillary pays for dossier 2. Dossier kicks off Obama ordered intelligence assessment (so important to democracy, Trump was never told of it) 3. Dossier serves as basis for FISA surveillance of Trump campaign and unmasking rates skyrocket 4. Hillary starts to speak of Trump-Russian ties in the middle of the campaign 5. Trump wins unexpectedly 6. Democrats blame Hillary loss on Russia swaying the election 7. Comey records meeting with Trump in the hopes of kicking off special counsel 8. Special Counsel appointed without Trump knowledge 9. Special Counsel finds no history or evidence of any collusion 10. Democrats switch to implications, innuendo and rumor of Putin "having something on" Trump How’s it going Boots? They finally did what you, I & others have been wanting since the old LT days and that was release the redacted FISA information. What are your thoughts on it so far?
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 10:47:53 GMT -6
And for the record, an indictment means shit. I just got a guy indicted for federal drug trafficking and conspiracy acquitted after a jury trial. The intelligence assessment that Russians hacked the DNC was with "High Confidence" (65% to 100% sure) and some agencies had less confidence and the DNI would not endorse the idea. DNI is the top intel boss for the government. (NOTE: This is the same intel community that said there were WMD's in Iraq and Democrats had blasted them as incompetent for years until now). All of that was concluded without the benefit of ever seeing the servers www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:52:20 GMT -6
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realdonaldtrump Andrew McCarthy - “I said this could never happen. This is so bad that they should be looking at the judges who signed off on this stuff, not just the people who gave it. It is so bad it screams out at you.” On the whole FISA scam which led to the rigged Mueller Witch Hunt! 8:22 AM - Jul 22, 2018
60.2K
33.2K people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 10:52:54 GMT -6
Follow the sequence of events. 1. Hillary pays for dossier 2. Dossier kicks off Obama ordered intelligence assessment (so important to democracy, Trump was never told of it) 3. Dossier serves as basis for FISA surveillance of Trump campaign and unmasking rates skyrocket 4. Hillary starts to speak of Trump-Russian ties in the middle of the campaign 5. Trump wins unexpectedly 6. Democrats blame Hillary loss on Russia swaying the election 7. Comey records meeting with Trump in the hopes of kicking off special counsel 8. Special Counsel appointed without Trump knowledge 9. Special Counsel finds no history or evidence of any collusion 10. Democrats switch to implications, innuendo and rumor of Putin "having something on" Trump How’s it going Boots? They finally did what you, I & others have been wanting since the old LT days and that was release the redacted FISA information. What are your thoughts on it so far? Read my post. It was a fucking set up from the jump. They used election muckraking to abuse the intelligence collection process to link Trump to Russia BEFORE THE ELECTION. THAT IS THE INSURANCE POLICY. The Democrats, aided by like minded counter intelligence folks uncovered and yet to be uncovered, colluded to hijack the election for Hillary. Remember, Hillary started the Trunp -Russia computer and bank link story in very late October - a week for the election www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-server-tied-to-russian-bank/THAT WAS THE DEMOCRATIC OCTOBER SURPRISE and the Obama administration was 100% complicit
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 10:57:14 GMT -6
dailycaller.com/2018/07/22/gowdy-adam-schiff-leak-collusion/South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy said Sunday that, after 18 months of congressional investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government, he has yet to see a “scintilla” of evidence showing that there was coordination between the two sides. The Republican also said it is unlikely that any Democrat has seen evidence of collusion because if they had, California Rep. Adam Schiff would have already leaked it. “I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said during an interview on “Fox News Sunday.” “That’s why they’ve moved off of collusion onto obstruction of justice, which is now their current preoccupation,” he added.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 11:02:04 GMT -6
How’s it going Boots? They finally did what you, I & others have been wanting since the old LT days and that was release the redacted FISA information. What are your thoughts on it so far? Read my post. It was a fucking set up from the jump. They used election muckraking to abuse the intelligence collection process to link Trump to Russia BEFORE THE ELECTION. THAT IS THE INSURANCE POLICY. The Democrats, aided by like minded counter intelligence folks uncovered and yet to be uncovered, colluded to hijack the election for Hillary. Remember, Hillary started the Trunp -Russia computer and bank link story in very late October - a week for the election www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-server-tied-to-russian-bank/THAT WAS THE DEMOCRATIC OCTOBER SURPRISE and the Obama administration was 100% complicit I went back and re-read your post and saw it answered my question already & agree. Unless the redacted information proves otherwise, this release is damning to the collusion conspiracy. It just verified beyond a shadow of a doubt the much earlier Nunes/House memo, which had verified the much earlier Grassley/Senate memo. Basically, falsifying intelligence, lying to judges, etc. Someone needs to go to jail over all this, it’s simply to blatant.
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 11:12:16 GMT -6
Read my post. It was a fucking set up from the jump. They used election muckraking to abuse the intelligence collection process to link Trump to Russia BEFORE THE ELECTION. THAT IS THE INSURANCE POLICY. The Democrats, aided by like minded counter intelligence folks uncovered and yet to be uncovered, colluded to hijack the election for Hillary. Remember, Hillary started the Trunp -Russia computer and bank link story in very late October - a week for the election www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-server-tied-to-russian-bank/THAT WAS THE DEMOCRATIC OCTOBER SURPRISE and the Obama administration was 100% complicit I went back and re-read your post and saw it answered my question already & agree. Unless the redacted information proves otherwise, this release is damning to the collusion conspiracy. It just verified beyond a shadow of a doubt the much earlier Nunes/House memo, which had verified the much earlier Grassley/Senate memo. Basically, falsifying intelligence, lying to judges, etc. Someone needs to go to jail over all this, it’s simply to blatant. Rest easy. Jim Acosta is ON IT !
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Jul 22, 2018 11:19:17 GMT -6
The real issue is the feeding of the dossier from the DNC/Hillary to the Obama Administration and then the feeding of FISA and counter intelligence investigation information back to the campaign
You want a crime? There it is.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 22, 2018 11:53:33 GMT -6
Some gallows should be built and have public hangings for these traitors
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 12:51:03 GMT -6
Some gallows should be built and have public hangings for these traitors Marco Rubio earlier today stated the DOJ/FBI did nothing wrong. I’m seeing this sentiment in other areas as well. It’s amazing how people can justify blatantly criminal behavior, as long as, it’s used against someone they dislike.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 12:57:03 GMT -6
Techno Fog Techno Fog @techno_Fog The FISA app also mentions a letter Page wrote to Coney denying the allegations made by Isikoff (through Steele). Strzok used this as a pretext to interview Page.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 12:58:20 GMT -6
Techno Fog Techno Fog @techno_Fog · 16h Replying to @techno_Fog Were Carter Page's supposed statutory criminal violations listed for the court - and are they now redacted? Looks like it.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 22, 2018 12:59:27 GMT -6
8 136 225 Techno Fog Techno Fog @techno_Fog · 16h June, 2017: FBI tells the FISA Judge that Page's activities "are ongoing" and preclude the conclusion that "all such information has been obtained and collected can be ended" Page was doing nothing at this point. Another lie to the court.
|
|