|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 9:15:28 GMT -6
I wish we could go back 5 years and tell the olds that Lou Dobbs, Fox News, the Republican President, and the GOP would refuse to speak out against Russian military intelligence trying to screw with our elections. oh wait, I have better things to do with a time machine than convincing simpletons of something they wouldn’t accept. Speaking of 5 years ago:
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 11:04:00 GMT -6
I can't let this go. If we go back 5 years, we literally have the quote that, "You said Russia. And the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back. Because the Cold War has been over for 20 years." Did Lou Dobbs or Fox News or the Republicans say that? Good grief. Some other great quotes: Why didn't Obama catch me being a traitor? SAD. - DOTUS
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 11:10:16 GMT -6
/video/1
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 11:24:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 12:17:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 12:21:28 GMT -6
Lol If you really believe this there is no hope for you.
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 12:21:56 GMT -6
Lol If you really believe this there is no hope for you. Fuck you traitor, you and your ilk are enemies of liberal democracy. You want that orange faced moron to be your king and dictator
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 12:34:34 GMT -6
I found the names of the 12 Russians!!!
Names of 12 Russians indicted: 1. Hillary Clintonesky 2: Barrocksky Obamovich 3. Sally Yateskich 4. John Brennovansky 5. Valerick Jarretkich 6. James Comeyski 7. Peter Strzoki 8. Bruce Ohrskoh 9. McCainzi 10. Susan Ricekoh 11. Lisa Pageovich 12. John Podestinskiah
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 12:37:08 GMT -6
Lol If you really believe this there is no hope for you. Fuck you traitor, you and your ilk are enemies of liberal democracy. You want that orange faced moron to be your king and dictator This is your President of the United States of America. Sucks to be you lol
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 13:07:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 13:14:21 GMT -6
"We are traitors, but as long as it pisses of those libtards it's all good" btw, those are Russians bots dumbass. (#walkaway)
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 13:18:15 GMT -6
Fuck you traitor, you and your ilk are enemies of liberal democracy. You want that orange faced moron to be your king and dictator This is your President of the United States of America. Sucks to be you lol That money laundering for Russian oligarchs traitorous bastard will be in prison soon enough.
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 14, 2018 13:27:40 GMT -6
gaucho is angry today----It must suck to see all your liberal dreams---Go Away right in front of your eyes
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 13:31:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 14, 2018 13:32:49 GMT -6
Lol If you really believe this there is no hope for you. Fuck you traitor, you and your ilk are enemies of liberal democracy. You want that orange faced moron to be your king and dictator YES----I am very much an enemy of "Liberal" Democracy-------Who decided that is what the country should be, I must have missed that vote
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 14, 2018 14:49:45 GMT -6
This is your President of the United States of America. Sucks to be you lol That money laundering for Russian oligarchs traitorous bastard will be in prison soon enough.Well, that would require actual evidence, which Mueller and company currently do not have,(which is why to date Zero Americans have been indicted on collusion charges). Add to it, Rosenstein once again stating that the attempted influence had zero effect on the election as no votes were changed & one can understand why your side is stinging.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jul 14, 2018 17:03:37 GMT -6
What. No words of wisdom from Cher, Meathead, Rosie, and the rest? Better do this while you can. Being it's Saturday night your mom is going to need the computer to book her dates.
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 14, 2018 17:14:33 GMT -6
What. No words of wisdom from Cher, Meathead, Rosie, and the rest? Better do this while you can. Being it's Saturday night your mom is going to need the computer to book her dates. So...how does it feel to be a fucking traitor asshole? Just think of the thousands of lives lost to protect democracy only for some Orange turd to ruin it because Putin has him by the balls. He couldn't give a shit about democracy since he wants to be a dictator like his heroes Putin and Kim Jong Un.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jul 14, 2018 19:10:18 GMT -6
So...how does it feel to be a fucking traitor asshole? Just think of the thousands of lives lost to protect democracy only for some Orange turd to ruin it because Putin has him by the balls. He couldn't give a shit about democracy since he wants to be a dictator like his heroes Putin and Kim Jong Un.
Wow. How does it feel to reach down and unzip your pants and there's nothing there?
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jul 14, 2018 19:15:02 GMT -6
So...how does it feel to be a fucking traitor asshole? Just think of the thousands of lives lost to protect democracy only for some Orange turd to ruin it because Putin has him by the balls. He couldn't give a shit about democracy since he wants to be a dictator like his heroes Putin and Kim Jong Un.
Wow. How does it feel to reach down and unzip your pants and there's nothing there? Ask him what sacrifices he’s making personally, to help the illegals and right these wrongs, to get a taste of the bullshit that is modern liberalism. They are so fake that it’s hard to watch. They want the world, yet cry about a minimum wage job. Adult sized children without a clue. And, lazy to boot. So, pretty much all around worthless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jul 14, 2018 19:51:56 GMT -6
Wow. How does it feel to reach down and unzip your pants and there's nothing there? Ask him what sacrifices he’s making personally, to help the illegals and right these wrongs, to get a taste of the bullshit that is modern liberalism. They are so fake that it’s hard to watch. They want the world, yet cry about a minimum wage job. Adult sized children without a clue. And, lazy to boot. So, pretty much all around worthless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Liberals require the spectacle of it all to get involved in the new cause. They also require to be able to pin it on others, in this case conservatives, to get involved. Close to 70% of all black children grow up in a broken home separated from a parent, which involves millions of children, yet they, the liberals, will walk over coals to stand up for 2000 separated immigrant children. Righteousness is not defined by convenience but this is something purposely overlooked by liberals. Look at the response by the "Me Too Movement" in response to Peter Fonda's comments regarding the female head of the DHS. The silence was deafening. It is all for convenience, it is all for show (fa show,fa show).
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jul 14, 2018 20:02:19 GMT -6
Ask him what sacrifices he’s making personally, to help the illegals and right these wrongs, to get a taste of the bullshit that is modern liberalism. They are so fake that it’s hard to watch. They want the world, yet cry about a minimum wage job. Adult sized children without a clue. And, lazy to boot. So, pretty much all around worthless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Liberals require the spectacle of it all to get involved in the new cause. They also require to be able to pin it on others, in this case conservatives, to get involved. Close to 70% of all black children grow up in a broken home separated from a parent, which involves millions of children, yet they, the liberals, will walk over coals to stand up for 2000 separated immigrant children. Righteousness is not defined by convenience but this is something purposely overlooked by liberals. Look at the response by the "Me Too Movement" in response to Peter Fonda's comments regarding the female head of the DHS. The silence was deafening. It is all for convenience, it is all for show (fa show,fa show). Everything they do is convenient. Want illegals here, social programs for all, a wage paid to all, free everything for everyone. But, they don’t want to work and pay 80% taxes for it. Hell, many of them don’t want to work at all. It’s so fake, and such a bunch of bullshit. Live a life of austerity while paying for everyone else, and lead the way. No? That’s because you’re fucking fake. Worthless... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 14, 2018 21:45:31 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 4:14:56 GMT -6
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/plot-thickens-dnc-allowed-russian-hackers-steal-data-manage-state-primaries/Donna Brazile says in her new book the Democratic National Committee (DNC) went against professional advice and sat idly for a month while Russians stole data because primaries were still underway in a number of states. In May, when CrowdStrike recommended that we take down our system and rebuild it, the DNC told them to wait a month, because the state primaries for the presidential election were still underway, and the party and the staff needed to be at their computers to manage these efforts,” Brazile wrote in her new book, “Hacks.” ......... Add to it, this: www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/obamas-cybersecurity-coordinator-confirms-susan-rice-ordered-stand-down-russian-meddling-2016-electionMichael Daniel confirmed Wednesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice ordered him and his staff to “stand down” in 2016 in regard to Russian attempts to meddle in the 2016 election. Daniel, special assistant to former President Barack Obama and White House cybersecurity coordinator, told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee that quotes attributed to him in the book, Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump, were an “accurate rendering of the conversation” he had with Rice and his staff. Daniel’s staff reportedly responded to the order in “disbelief.” ...... So, the DNC & Obama knew about it & decided to let it continue.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 4:21:16 GMT -6
Video at link: dailycaller.com/2018/07/14/cnn-meltdown-russian-obama/CNN host Michael Smerconish went on a rant Saturday morning calling the Russian election meddling “a terror strike.” Smerconish was responding to a tweet from a viewer asking if he would hold former President Obama accountable, since the Russian meddling took place under the Obama administration. “Here’s what I’m looking for, instead of this going on between liberals and conservatives, Republican and Democrats, what happened to when we were united against a common enemy?” Smerconish asked rhetorically. “This was terrorism. We were the victims of a terror strike and will the commander-in-chief on Monday hold accountable the presumed perpetrator of that terror strike?” “Stop all the liberal, conservative red state, blue state stuff. Our partisan differences used to end at the water’s edge,” he continued. A tweet from @swingdriver210 asked, “Will you hold Obama accountable? You say you are fair. We will see. I mean all this meddling happened under Obama and no one cares.”
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 4:21:42 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 4:30:50 GMT -6
www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-14/credible-lisa-page-wows-house-gop-supports-theory-fbi-had-desired-outcome-russia"Credible" Lisa Page Wows House GOP; Supports Theory FBI Had "Desired Outcome" In Russia Probe GOP lawmakers were pleased with former FBI attorney Lisa Page's Friday closed-door interview with select House committee members - in sharp contrast to her former FBI co-worker and lover Peter Strzok's Thursday testimony which was mostly a ten-hourtrain wreck. After just five hours, a "cooperative" and "credible" Page answered many questions Strzok didn't, according to Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) as reported by Politico's Kyle Cheney, in large part because FBI attorneys present at the session backed off and let her answer more questions. Kyle Cheney ✔ @kyledcheney Rep. Ratcliffe says Lisa PAGE answered many questions Strzok didn’t and that lawmakers learned a lot of new information. He declined to provide any other details. 4:51 PM - Jul 13, 2018 1,098 727 people are talking about this Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) - one of Page's harshest critics leading up to her appearance, said that her cooperation "speaks well of her" according to The Hill. thehill.com/policy/national-security/396980-former-fbi-lawyer-lisa-page-gets-closed-door-grilling-from-house“We certainly learned additional things today, but I can tell you that the last thing anyone wants to be is falsely accused and her willingness to cooperate today speaks well of her" -Rep. Mark Meadows ....... Kyle Cheney ✔ @kyledcheney Rep. Gaetz says the questions Lisa Page answered — but Strzok would not — heighten his concern about whether the FBI was driving toward a “desired outcome” in its Russia probe. He said FBI counsel was still there and at times intervened to prevent her from answering. 5:09 PM - Jul 13, 2018 447 345 people are talking about this Gaetz also questioned the presence of FBI attorneys during the private testimony. “Lisa Page is not an FBI employee, but the FBI was here providing counsel and giving her direction as to which questions to answer or not answer and there is a question as to the propriety of that before the House,” Gaetz said, according to the Hill. But he said he also found Page to be “more credible” than Strzok, the New York Post reported. “I didn’t agree with her characterization of every text message and every piece of evidence,” Gaetz said as he left the House hearing. “But we did not see the smug attitude from Lisa Page that we saw from Peter Strzok.” -Fox News www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/14/lisa-page-cooperative-credible-lawmakers-say-after-5-hour-closed-door-session.html
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 6:31:10 GMT -6
Transcript: dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/ Gohmert: You said earlier in this hearing you were concerned about a hostile foreign power affecting the election. Do you recall the former Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough having an investigation into an anomaly found on Hillary Clinton’s emails?
Let me refresh your memory. The Intelligence Community Inspector General Chuck McCullough sent his investigator Frank Rucker along with an IGIC attorney Janette McMillan to brief you and Dean Chapelle and two other FBI personnel who I won’t name at this time, about an anomaly they had found on Hillary Clinton’s emails that were going to the private unauthorized server that you were supposed to be investigating?
Strzok: I remember meeting Mr. Rucker on either one or two occasions. I do not recall the specific content or discussions.
Gohmert: Mr. Rucker reported to those of you, the four of you there, in the presence of the ICIG attorney, that they had found this anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list. It was a compartmentalized bit of information that was sending it to an unauthorized source. Do you recall that?
Strzok: Sir, I don’t.
Gohmert: He went on the explain it. And you didn’t say anything, you thanked him, you shook his hand. The problem is it was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia and from what you’ve said here, you did nothing more than nod and shake the man’s hand when you didn’t seem to be all that concerned about our national integrity of our election when it was involving Hillary Clinton. So the forensic examination was done by the ICIG — and they can document that — but you were given that information and you did nothing with it. And one of the things I found most egregious with Mr. Horowitz’s testimony, and — by the way Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 15, 2018 9:02:51 GMT -6
www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/peter-strzok-testimony-congress-should-use-contempt-power-or-end-investigations/Congress should either use its contempt power or shut down the investigations. An investigation is one of two things: a search for the truth, or a farce. The House is conducting a farce. That fact was on full display during ten hours of testimony by Peter Strzok, the logorrheic lawman who steered the FBI’s Clinton-emails and Trump–Russia probes. The principal question before the joint investigation of the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees is whether the Democratic administration’s law-enforcement and intelligence arms strained to manufacture an espionage case against the Republican candidate, having buried an eminently prosecutable criminal case against the Democratic presidential nominee. It should be straightforward to answer this question, provided that the investigative process has the one attribute central to any credible probe: the capacity to compel the production of evidence and testimony, with the corollary power to hold witnesses in contempt for defiance. The House investigation has devolved into farce because it lacks this feature. Oh, it exists on paper. There is even a statute making contempt of Congress a crime, punishable by up to a year in prison (and not less than a month). That may not sound like much, but the months can pile up: A separate offense occurs each time a question is ducked or a document is not surrendered. As the Wall Street Journal’s Bill McGurn explains, Congress has inherent power to enforce its subpoenas unilaterally, or it can seek assistance from the other branches. But then reality intrudes. The committees pursuing the probe lack either the will or the votes — or perhaps both — to hold witnesses in contempt. This, despite audacious refusals to answer questions and turn over documents that would explain when and why the Trump–Russia investigation commenced.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jul 15, 2018 9:50:15 GMT -6
Where is the Obama investigation for China?
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸 @jackposobiec · 15h I can't stress this enough
China hacked the US government and stole the personnel info of American intelligence officers in 2014
And nothing happened
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸 Jack Posobiec🇺🇸 @jackposobiec · 15h Did You Know:
In 2014 the DOJ indicted 5 Chinese military officers for hacking the US OPM database and stealing 22 million records
Those officers never once appeared in a US courtroom
Obama held a summit with Xi the next year
The Chinese never stopped their cyberattacks
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸 @jackposobiec · 15h Did You Know:
China assassinated or captured 20 covert CIA assets between 2010 and 2012
This was the worst intel op failure since the Cold War
And Obama did nothing
|
|