|
Post by sooner98 on Jul 7, 2018 22:12:47 GMT -6
www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/07/trumps-legal-team-demands-factual-basis-for-mueller-probe-before-agreeing-to-interview.htmlPresident Trump’s lawyers have told FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller that they want him to produce evidence that Trump has committed a crime before they agree for the president to be interviewed as part of Mueller’s Russia investigation. Rudy Giuliani, the top lawyer on the legal team, told Fox News on Saturday he is asking Mueller for a “factual basis for the investigation” before the team considers allowing Trump to be interviewed by Mueller’s team. Trump and his team have become increasingly frustrated with how long Mueller’s probe is taking to complete, and Trump in particular has taken a more aggressive stance toward Mueller since the Department of Justice criticized the FBI’s actions in 2016 in relation to the Hillary Clinton email probe. The new demands by Trump’s legal team indicate that it is likely to take a more aggressive and combative stance toward Mueller going forward. Trump demands.... He reminds me of kids when I was in school who claimed they'd fight someone but couldn't because they'd get in trouble by their parents: "I'd love to talk to Mueller but my lawyers won't let me." Yes, the reason they won't let you is because you're a pathological liar and will tell 10 different versions of the same story within 2 minutes of Mueller's interview. But of course, that would be Mueller's fault and "entrapment". Geez. I don't see whyhe should get any special treatment that you and I wouldn't get if being investigated for something. Neither of us could hand the lead investigator a list of questions we will or won't answer and a time limit to do it in. But hey, I guess if it's "my guy", I'm willing to change the rules to my own detriment. We (and the president) have been told repeatedly that he is not under investigation, and that he is not a target of the special counsel. Give me one good reason why Trump should agree to anything more at this point that these subordinate, partisan hack, coup attempters request of him?
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 8, 2018 5:57:35 GMT -6
www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/07/trumps-legal-team-demands-factual-basis-for-mueller-probe-before-agreeing-to-interview.htmlPresident Trump’s lawyers have told FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller that they want him to produce evidence that Trump has committed a crime before they agree for the president to be interviewed as part of Mueller’s Russia investigation. Rudy Giuliani, the top lawyer on the legal team, told Fox News on Saturday he is asking Mueller for a “factual basis for the investigation” before the team considers allowing Trump to be interviewed by Mueller’s team. Trump and his team have become increasingly frustrated with how long Mueller’s probe is taking to complete, and Trump in particular has taken a more aggressive stance toward Mueller since the Department of Justice criticized the FBI’s actions in 2016 in relation to the Hillary Clinton email probe. The new demands by Trump’s legal team indicate that it is likely to take a more aggressive and combative stance toward Mueller going forward. Trump demands.... He reminds me of kids when I was in school who claimed they'd fight someone but couldn't because they'd get in trouble by their parents: "I'd love to talk to Mueller but my lawyers won't let me." Yes, the reason they won't let you is because you're a pathological liar and will tell 10 different versions of the same story within 2 minutes of Mueller's interview. But of course, that would be Mueller's fault and "entrapment". Geez. I don't see whyhe should get any special treatment that you and I wouldn't get if being investigated for something. Neither of us could hand the lead investigator a list of questions we will or won't answer and a time limit to do it in. But hey, I guess if it's "my guy", I'm willing to change the rules to my own detriment. Seeing as how the polls are shifting to where more people are opposed to this investigation, it would be prudent to show what he has. But, we know Mueller won’t, because to date, he has nothing. He thought he had a slam dunk PR win when he indicted the Russian companies, etc. However, that fell apart when Concord Management began fighting back in court by demanding to see the evidence against them,(Mueller has refused to show them) & by asking for a fast trial date to start,(which Mueller keeps delaying). Given Mueller’s dubious at best past with going after the wrong people, he needs to prove he has what he went after, instead of things that have nothing to do with Russian collusion,(Cough Manafort cough,(who his fellow feds were after for 10years but never pressed charges, etc).
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 9, 2018 6:08:48 GMT -6
amp.dailycaller.com/2018/07/08/mueller-manafort-journalist-leak/Justice Department documents released on Friday confirm that the DOJ attorney known as Robert Mueller’s “pit bull” arranged a meeting with journalists in April 2017 to discuss an investigation into Paul Manafort. The documents show that Andrew Weissmann arranged a meeting with DOJ and FBI officials and four Associated Press reporters on April 11, 2017, just over a month before Mueller was appointed special counsel. Manafort’s lawyers obtained the documents on June 29 and revealed them in a briefing filed in federal court in Virginia. The attorneys are pushing for a hearing into what they say are possible leaks of secret grand jury information, false information and potentially classified materials from the meeting. “The meeting raises serious concerns about whether a violation of grand jury secrecy occurred,” a lawyer for Manafort, Kevin Downing, wrote in a motion requesting a hearing. “Based on the FBI’s own notes of the meeting, it is beyond question that a hearing is warranted.” Manafort’s attorneys have for months questioned whether Weissmann, the number two official on the Mueller team, leaked information about Manafort to The AP. At the time of the meeting, Weissmann served as chief of the Justice Department’s criminal fraud section.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 9, 2018 9:33:34 GMT -6
Jacob Wohl ✔ @jacobawohl Dirty Cops Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller hacked the code and broke into Paul Manafort's storage locker. They then gave 2 AP Reporters the code to Manafort's locker. AP reporters broke in, reported on the contents in a news story, thus giving Mueller goods to get a warrant 10:19 PM - Jul 8, 2018 6,997 6,412 people are talking about this ......... Bernard B. Kerik ✔ @bernardkerik If this is true, it is a violation of federal law in addition to attempting to influence the jury pool. They threw Manafort in solitary confinement, claiming witness tampering. So, what happens to them? They are not supposed to break the law to enforce it. Bernard B. Kerik ✔ @bernardkerik Manafort's lawyers claim DoJ meeting with AP led to improper leaks dailym.ai/2J4U2sa 9:49 PM - Jul 8, 2018 1,897 1,134 people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 9, 2018 9:53:58 GMT -6
Jacob Wohl ✔ @jacobawohl Dirty Cops Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller hacked the code and broke into Paul Manafort's storage locker. They then gave 2 AP Reporters the code to Manafort's locker. AP reporters broke in, reported on the contents in a news story, thus giving Mueller goods to get a warrant 10:19 PM - Jul 8, 2018 6,997 6,412 people are talking about this ......... Bernard B. Kerik ✔ @bernardkerik If this is true, it is a violation of federal law in addition to attempting to influence the jury pool. They threw Manafort in solitary confinement, claiming witness tampering. So, what happens to them? They are not supposed to break the law to enforce it. Bernard B. Kerik ✔ @bernardkerik Manafort's lawyers claim DoJ meeting with AP led to improper leaks dailym.ai/2J4U2sa 9:49 PM - Jul 8, 2018 1,897 1,134 people are talking about this wow
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 10, 2018 19:47:19 GMT -6
Ron DeSantis ✔ @repdesantis Anti-Trump FBI lawyer Lisa Page is defying a congressional subpoena because she doesn’t want to answer questions or be held accountable. Pathetic. 9:23 PM - Jul 10, 2018 1,314 1,013 people are talking about this Alex Moe ✔ @alexnbcnews Lisa Page will NOT attend the deposition Wednesday before House Judiciary & Oversight Cmtes bc wants more info on scope of intv and time to prepare per her lawyer —> 8:45 PM - Jul 10, 2018 62 140 people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 10, 2018 20:39:00 GMT -6
Mark Meadows ✔ @repmarkmeadows This statement from Lisa Page's attorneys could've been better summed up in one short sentence: "We're choosing to ignore a Congressional subpoena"
Indefensible .....
Rep. Jim Jordan ✔ @jim_Jordan Lisa Page ignores congressional subpoena, once again showing the double standard. One set of rules for regular Americans, a different set for the Swamp! 9:54 PM - Jul 10, 2018
7,035
4,926 people are talking about this .....
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realdonaldtrump I am on Air Force One flying to NATO and hear reports that the FBI lovers, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are getting cold feet on testifying about the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by 13 Angry Democrats and people that worked for Obama for 8 years. Total disgrace! 10:40 AM - Jul 10, 2018
84K
40.3K people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 10, 2018 20:47:00 GMT -6
If she doesn’t show up, begin Contempt of Congress proceedings against her & hit her with the max penalties allowed,(i.e. a thousand dollar fine & a year in jail).
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 11, 2018 11:52:07 GMT -6
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5940645/Woman-48-dead-garbage-chute-Anthony-Weiner-Huma-Abedins-former-address.html#commentsyournewswire.com/dead-body-abedin-weiner-garbage/The unidentified female was discovered inside the trash compactor of the Manhattan apartment complex that Huma Abedin and convicted pedophile Anthony Weiner have used as a base for the last 16 years. Police had been called to the block at 1 Irving Place in Union Square, after a maintenance worker found the body. Police have withheld the identity of the woman, believed to be in her forties, until they notify her family. They do not yet know how she ended up in the trash compactor, or why, and they are refusing to rule out high-profile arrests NBC reports her purse, full of cash, was found nearby, however according to the Daily Mail, neighbors told police they assumed their visit was related to Anthony Weiner’s conviction.[/i] Security footage also shows the woman walking into Abedin and Weiner’s apartment building shortly before she was found inside the trash compactor, PIX11 reported. pix11.com/2018/07/10/womans-body-found-in-trash-compactor-near-union-square/
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 11, 2018 11:58:09 GMT -6
holy moly this is getting good
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 11, 2018 12:01:31 GMT -6
If she doesn’t show up, begin Contempt of Congress proceedings against her & hit her with the max penalties allowed,(i.e. a thousand dollar fine & a year in jail).
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 11, 2018 12:04:06 GMT -6
Anyone want to bet that this doesn't end up going all the way up to Barack ?
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 11, 2018 12:11:20 GMT -6
Mark Meadows ✔ @repmarkmeadows Contrary to what her attorneys are telling the media, we just learned Lisa Page actually DID review documents at the FBI yesterday. Her failure to appear before Congress this morning had little to do with 'preparation'--and everything to do with avoiding accountability. 10:37 AM - Jul 11, 2018 12.3K 7,712 people are talking about this www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/paul-ryan-very-disturbed-by-lisa-pages-no-show“I am very disturbed by this. Congressional subpoenas for testimony are not optional. … She was a part of a mess that they have uncovered over at DOJ. She has an obligation to come testify.” “If she wants to come plead the Fifth, that’s her choice. But a subpoena to testify before Congress is not optional. It’s mandatory. She needs to comply.” ...... Stop threatening it, grow a set and begin the Contempt of Congress proceedings for her, Rosenstein, etc.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jul 11, 2018 13:46:16 GMT -6
Mark Meadows ✔ @repmarkmeadows Contrary to what her attorneys are telling the media, we just learned Lisa Page actually DID review documents at the FBI yesterday. Her failure to appear before Congress this morning had little to do with 'preparation'--and everything to do with avoiding accountability. 10:37 AM - Jul 11, 2018 12.3K 7,712 people are talking about this www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/paul-ryan-very-disturbed-by-lisa-pages-no-show“I am very disturbed by this. Congressional subpoenas for testimony are not optional. … She was a part of a mess that they have uncovered over at DOJ. She has an obligation to come testify.” “If she wants to come plead the Fifth, that’s her choice. But a subpoena to testify before Congress is not optional. It’s mandatory. She needs to comply.” ...... Stop threatening it, grow a set and begin the Contempt of Congress proceedings for her, Rosenstein, etc. This is nothing new. Lerner, Holder, clapper should all have left in handcuffs. These people regularly blow off Congress yet the left is losing it over Trump refusing to talk?
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Jul 11, 2018 16:15:34 GMT -6
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5940645/Woman-48-dead-garbage-chute-Anthony-Weiner-Huma-Abedins-former-address.html#commentsyournewswire.com/dead-body-abedin-weiner-garbage/The unidentified female was discovered inside the trash compactor of the Manhattan apartment complex that Huma Abedin and convicted pedophile Anthony Weiner have used as a base for the last 16 years. Police had been called to the block at 1 Irving Place in Union Square, after a maintenance worker found the body. Police have withheld the identity of the woman, believed to be in her forties, until they notify her family. They do not yet know how she ended up in the trash compactor, or why, and they are refusing to rule out high-profile arrests NBC reports her purse, full of cash, was found nearby, however according to the Daily Mail, neighbors told police they assumed their visit was related to Anthony Weiner’s conviction. Since it is Clinton-related, she was horribly suicided to death.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jul 11, 2018 22:04:08 GMT -6
Lee Zeldin ✔ @repleezeldin If it requires handcuffs to get Lisa Page, an employee of the fed govt, to abide by a Congressional subpoena to testify & answer questions then so be it. Working for the FBI is a great privilege, but Page doesn’t become her own branch of govt in charge of her own set of fed laws. 3:13 PM - Jul 11, 2018
17.9K
8,139 people are talking about this
Lee Zeldin ✔ @repleezeldin Page’s refusal to testify in Congress shows even more contempt for the American people, accountability & transparency, than it shows contempt of Congress. This former top FBI official & Strzok accomplice should be held in contempt & brought to Capitol Hill by force if necessary. 6:56 PM - Jul 11, 2018
1,711
910 people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Jul 12, 2018 8:02:03 GMT -6
Lee Zeldin ✔ @repleezeldin If it requires handcuffs to get Lisa Page, an employee of the fed govt, to abide by a Congressional subpoena to testify & answer questions then so be it. Working for the FBI is a great privilege, but Page doesn’t become her own branch of govt in charge of her own set of fed laws. 3:13 PM - Jul 11, 2018 17.9K 8,139 people are talking about this Lee Zeldin ✔ @repleezeldin Page’s refusal to testify in Congress shows even more contempt for the American people, accountability & transparency, than it shows contempt of Congress. This former top FBI official & Strzok accomplice should be held in contempt & brought to Capitol Hill by force if necessary. 6:56 PM - Jul 11, 2018 1,711 910 people are talking about this If Michael Flynn or Paul Manafort had ignored a subpoena, Robert Mueller would have seen to it that they were taken at gunpoint, strapped down, had Hannibal Lecter restraint masks placed on them, forced them to plead guilty to crimes against humanity, and then summarily executed by upside-down crucifixion.
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Jul 12, 2018 8:14:59 GMT -6
"Layer". I love this president.
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 9:19:13 GMT -6
Man, this hearing is very contentious. Too bad some of these congress members weren't as adamant when questioning the other side about getting their answers. You can tell which side they play for.
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 12, 2018 9:40:15 GMT -6
Anyone that is watching the hearings and does not think the Dems are in full cover up mode is an idiot
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 9:44:15 GMT -6
Anyone that is watching the hearings and does not think the Dems are in full cover up mode is an idiot Not mutually exclusive. And anyone who has watched this president lie and backtrack for the past 18 months, and doesn't think he's trying to cover up, is an idiot as well. They're all dirty. "Outsider"...yeah, sure.
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 12, 2018 10:21:06 GMT -6
Nadler is a special kind of cocksucker. He is totally off script here...once he was done sucking Strzok off he starts railing about how scared the Republicans are; HAHAHA...stupid bastard
|
|
|
Post by nmgaucho on Jul 12, 2018 10:23:42 GMT -6
Peter Strzok nukes Trey Gowdy for attacks on FBI to cover Trump's 'disgusting' behavior
Strzok response at 2:20
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 12, 2018 10:39:57 GMT -6
Now Lofgren is using her ENTIRE time pontificating. Not ONE question.
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 10:51:20 GMT -6
Nadler is a special kind of cocksucker. He is totally off script here...once he was done sucking Strzok off he starts railing about how scared the Republicans are; HAHAHA...stupid bastard I agree...there was no real point of that. Completely filled with opinion and no questions for the interviewee. Felt the same way about the chairman concerning the transcript being released. He's full of crap and being partisan as well. This is what we have.
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 10:54:18 GMT -6
Can anyone, and I mean this sincerely as I have not kept up as much lately, provide ACTUAL evidence where this guy's obvious bias affected his conducting the investigation?
Can a guy who likes Chevy's and hates Ford's conduct a crash test on Fords for consumer reports magazine or some other entity without his bias affecting the investigation? The evidence is the evidence is it not? I can understand why it would be questioned, but without any proof, the evidence is the evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 12, 2018 11:01:56 GMT -6
Can anyone, and I mean this sincerely as I have not kept up as much lately, provide ACTUAL evidence where this guy's obvious bias affected his conducting the investigation? Can a guy who likes Chevy's and hates Ford's conduct a crash test on Fords for consumer reports magazine or some other entity without his bias affecting the investigation? The evidence is the evidence is it not? I can understand why it would be questioned, but without any proof, the evidence is the evidence. I don't think it is COMPLETELY possible to remove personal bias' from ones job. If you hate something, you hate it and it will affect how you view situations. It is possible to not do it overtly or blantantly...but if you hate Ford's you hate Fords...also crash test are pretty cut and dried...not clearly as cut and dried as an "investigation". It's all about the prism you view things through..
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 12, 2018 11:06:26 GMT -6
Shelia Jackson Lee is really out in left field-----Any questions coming ?
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 11:09:06 GMT -6
Can anyone, and I mean this sincerely as I have not kept up as much lately, provide ACTUAL evidence where this guy's obvious bias affected his conducting the investigation? Can a guy who likes Chevy's and hates Ford's conduct a crash test on Fords for consumer reports magazine or some other entity without his bias affecting the investigation? The evidence is the evidence is it not? I can understand why it would be questioned, but without any proof, the evidence is the evidence. I don't think it is COMPLETELY possible to remove personal bias' from ones job. If you hate something, you hate it and it will affect how you view situations. It is possible to not do it overtly or blantantly...but if you hate Ford's you hate Fords...also crash test are pretty cut and dried...not clearly as cut and dried as an "investigation". It's all about the prism you view things through.. But that's my point: You can see with hard evidence whether or not Russians tried to influence the election by buying ads, for example. You can ascertain as to whether Hillary was using a private server. Those are not affected on iota by bias. What IS affected by bias are making determinations, such as using terms (as noted in the hearings), careless or negligent (as it pertains to Hillary). Whether or not Trump penned the letter for his son one the plane is not subject to the bias of the interviewer who asks the question or the investigator doing the investigating....he either did or didn't. I'd like to know what parts of the investigation do they KNOW were tainted due to bias?
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 12, 2018 11:09:42 GMT -6
Shelia Jackson Lee is really out in left field-----Any questions coming ? Another dumb democrat wanting to make it something it isn't about.
|
|