|
Post by trumped on Jun 20, 2018 20:50:21 GMT -6
bRad FitzPatriot +++ bRad FitzPatriot +++ @bradfitzpatriot · 2h Something BIG is coming this way !!! PACER MOVEMENT !!! Summons Issued: SOROS DAVID BROCK, HILLARY CLINTON, WILLIAM CLINTON, CLINTON FOUNDATION, CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE, CLINTON-GIUSTRA , CORRECT THE RECORD, MEDIA MATTERS, JOHN PODESTA, SHAREBLUE . BOOM (link: www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24810209/Byrne_v_Foundation_et_al) pacermonitor.com/public/case/24…
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 20, 2018 23:21:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 20, 2018 23:21:47 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 21, 2018 14:08:46 GMT -6
www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/mueller-investigation-obstruction-ig-report-should-end/amp/The IG Report Should End Mueller’s Obstruction Investigation By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY The same logic that spared FBI and Justice Department officials harsher treatment in Michael Horowitz’s report should inoculate the president. While generally cautious about criticizing Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on the Clinton-emails investigation, Trump supporters have taken aim at its chief logical flaw: Although key investigators harbored anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias, and even made statements indicating an intention to act on that bias, the IG did not find that this bias was the proximate cause of any particular investigative decision. This conclusion is easy to rebut; I did so myself in a column last week. Yet, the Trump camp should also be embracing it. Why? Because if this is the Justice Department’s position, then Special Counsel Robert Mueller has no business investigating the president for obstruction. The IG’s rationale has been vulnerable to attack because of the way it has been distorted by FBI director Christopher Wray and congressional Democrats. They blithely assert that the IG found no bias in the FBI’s decision-making. That claim insults our intelligence. The report documents a surfeit of political animus. Chapter Twelve, in which the IG marshals text messages and other recorded communications between investigators, is breathtaking. The report does not say that the investigators’ manifest loathing of Trump, their expressed intent to derail his presidential bid, and their desire to bring about his impeachment were irrelevant. It says that (a) because there were legitimate policy considerations that could have informed every one of their investigative decisions, and (b) because, as a matter of law, the FBI and Justice Department have broad discretion to make such judgment calls, (c) it is not the IG’s place to second-guess those decisions.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 21, 2018 15:04:22 GMT -6
Pinned Tweet Thomas Paine Thomas Paine @thomas1774paine · 5h FBI: Hundreds of Bureau Agents Took Bribes from CNN, NY Times, NBC News and More; Wray Looks the Other Way to Protect Media Partners (link: bit.ly/2IahvYk) bit.ly/2IahvYk
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 21, 2018 16:26:32 GMT -6
Pinned Tweet Thomas Paine Thomas Paine @thomas1774paine · 5h FBI: Hundreds of Bureau Agents Took Bribes from CNN, NY Times, NBC News and More; Wray Looks the Other Way to Protect Media Partners (link: bit.ly/2IahvYk) bit.ly/2IahvYk This better not be true. What kind of clown show was Comey running over there?? And why is he acting so indignant?? Wray needs to go too. No clue why Trump is supporting that apologist.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 21, 2018 16:34:13 GMT -6
Just had another thought (finally getting to sit down with a Guinness):
I remember when I used to rant on at LT about how the Deep State tried to overthrow our government...often. I know others here were of the same mind as well. Now that we have proof, I wonder if any of those guys turned the corner? One of the reasons I wish DB had opened a (virtually banless) political board. I’d like to ask those guys if they finally believe, and how that’s changed their views on the entire situation we’re dealing with here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 21, 2018 16:53:39 GMT -6
Just had another thought (finally getting to sit down with a Guinness): I remember when I used to rant on at LT about how the Deep State tried to overthrow our government...often. I know others here were of the same mind as well. Now that we have proof, I wonder if any of those guys turned the corner? One of the reasons I wish DB had opened a (virtually banless) political board. I’d like to ask those guys if they finally believe, and how that’s changed their views on the entire situation we’re dealing with here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk You. Rant? never! I doubt it. Facing facts has never seemed to make a difference. We'd be hearing about no real bias or 22 indictments by Mueller. Same old deflection. Obama was running a criminal enterprise and had the DOJ and the FBI providing cover. That is why the election of Clinton was so important.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 21, 2018 17:01:34 GMT -6
Just had another thought (finally getting to sit down with a Guinness): I remember when I used to rant on at LT about how the Deep State tried to overthrow our government...often. I know others here were of the same mind as well. Now that we have proof, I wonder if any of those guys turned the corner? One of the reasons I wish DB had opened a (virtually banless) political board. I’d like to ask those guys if they finally believe, and how that’s changed their views on the entire situation we’re dealing with here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk You. Rant? never! I doubt it. Facing facts has never seemed to make a difference. We'd be hearing about no real bias or 22 indictments by Mueller. Same old deflection. Obama was running a criminal enterprise and had the DOJ and the FBI providing cover. That is why the election of Clinton was so important. Lol, and yeah, that sucks. I was hoping we could convert some of the never trumpers. If they could finally see what we saw so long ago, maybe they’d realize why we did what we did, and why we said what we said. And, maybe they’d get on the boat and realize that, had Hillary been elected, our beloved country’s death spiral would have accelerated unseen and unabated. The honest truth is that, even with an establishment pub, the death spiral would have continued, only debatably less accelerated than under Hillary. Trump threw all the spotlights on it. And maybe he doesn’t deserve ALL the credit, but he certainly deserves the lion’s share. MAGA “Shine on, you crazy diamond...” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 21, 2018 17:03:03 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 21, 2018 17:07:43 GMT -6
Lol, and yeah, that sucks. I was hoping we could convert some of the never trumpers. If they could finally see what we saw so long ago, maybe they’d realize why we did what we did, and why we said what we said. And, maybe they’d get on the boat and realize that, had Hillary been elected, our beloved country’s death spiral would have accelerated unseen and unabated. The honest truth is that, even with an establishment pub, the death spiral would have continued, only debatably less accelerated than under Hillary. Trump stopped it all. And maybe he doesn’t deserve ALL the credit, but he certainly deserves the lion’s share. MAGA He's trying. And he was far from my choice. I was a Scott Walker guy but after he couldn't even balance his checkbook I knew he wasn't ready. Once it was clear that Trump was the guy it was a no brainer to support him. Much like supporting McCain and Romney it was better them than the Dem. I wonder if the left is rethinking their destruction of Sanders. I believe he might have had a chance against Trump. Clinton was just such a terrible candidate.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 21, 2018 17:10:22 GMT -6
Lol, and yeah, that sucks. I was hoping we could convert some of the never trumpers. If they could finally see what we saw so long ago, maybe they’d realize why we did what we did, and why we said what we said. And, maybe they’d get on the boat and realize that, had Hillary been elected, our beloved country’s death spiral would have accelerated unseen and unabated. The honest truth is that, even with an establishment pub, the death spiral would have continued, only debatably less accelerated than under Hillary. Trump stopped it all. And maybe he doesn’t deserve ALL the credit, but he certainly deserves the lion’s share. MAGA He's trying. And he was far from my choice. I was a Scott Walker guy but after he couldn't even balance his checkbook I knew he wasn't ready. Once it was clear that Trump was the guy it was a no brainer to support him. Much like supporting McCain and Romney it was better them than the Dem. I wonder if the left is rethinking their destruction of Sanders. I believe he might have had a chance against Trump. Clinton was just such a terrible candidate. Yeah, Sanders would have been a better fight. That’s just the truth. Because now it’s ideology vs ideology. And, there’s a social/ideological shift that was Obama was encouraging. On purpose. No doubt in my mind that Obama regrets backing Hillary. Hell, the entire DC establishment backed Hillary, so hard to blame him. But, I know he regrets it. Sincerely. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 21, 2018 18:10:42 GMT -6
Yeah, Sanders would have been a better fight. That’s just the truth. Because now it’s ideology vs ideology. And, there’s a social/ideological shift that was Obama was encouraging. On purpose. No doubt in my mind that Obama regrets backing Hillary. Hell, the entire DC establishment backed Hillary, so hard to blame him. But, I know he regrets it. Sincerely. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk She knows where everything is buried. He didn't have a choice. Anyone that thinks he didn't have a role in all of this is fooling themselves. Group think only gets you so far.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 21, 2018 20:14:26 GMT -6
Bahaha. 4D chess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 21, 2018 20:36:01 GMT -6
Bahaha. 4D chess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk He should fire Sessions while on the plane ride to Russia lol
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 21, 2018 20:51:42 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 21, 2018 20:53:26 GMT -6
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Kevin Clinesmith, the FBI attorney who was the lead attorney on the Trump-Russia investigation and who vowed to join the "resistance" after Trump won, previously worked for Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm, who Hillary named to co-chair her presidential transition team 9:02 PM - Jun 21, 2018 2,376 2,007 people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 22, 2018 6:53:54 GMT -6
thefederalist.com/2018/06/22/fbi-convicted-clear-bias-trump-investigation-racial-discrimination-lawsuit/LAW The FBI Would Be Convicted Of Clear Bias If Its Trump Investigation Were A Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Hillary and Trump are similarly situated, yet in investigating allegations of illegality, the FBI approached the cases differently. It's extremely clear from the inspector general report. Margot Cleveland By Margot Cleveland JUNE 22, 2018 Conservatives stood agape last week at the inspector general’s refusal to state the obvious in his 568-page review of the FBI and Justice Department’s handling of the Clinton probe: A pro-Hillary political bias led officials to let her off the hook. While Michael Horowitz’s report highlighted numerous instances of anti-Trump and pro-Hillary bias, in true lawyerly fashion he focused in the conclusion on the lack of “documentary or testimonial evidence” showing that political prejudice “directly affected” the decisions made in the investigation. As a lawyer with a niche in employment law, this phrasing struck a chord of hilarity in me, because the methods of proving discriminatory intent are well-established, and such direct evidence of animus (or favoritism) is not required to show that an illegal motive drove an employment decision. Under the federal statute that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of age, sex, race, national origin, or religion, a plaintiff must prove an employer took an adverse employment action because of the employee’s membership in a protected class. In other words, an employee must prove that because he is African-American, and not Caucasian, the employer denied him a promotion (or didn’t hire him, or fired him). Over the years, the courts have crafted two methods of proving discriminatory intent: the direct method and the indirect method. Under the direct method, a plaintiff must present direct or circumstantial evidence of animus. Direct evidence basically involves an admission that the illegal animus, whether it be race or sex, national origin or religion, motived the employment decision. “I fired Ed because he is too old to coach football,” would be a simple example. Circumstantial evidence may also establish discriminatory intent but requires an added inference. For instance, circumstantial evidence that racial animus motivated the employer could come in the form of past racist statements or racial slurs, even without the employer tying the employee’s race to the current employment decision. An employer’s past race-based employment decisions would likewise serve as evidence that race motivated the employer’s treatment of this employee. However, given the ease with which an employer can disguise discriminatory intent, employees can instead prove illegal animus through the indirect method. Under the indirect method, an employee creates an inference of discriminatory intent by showing that the employer treated the plaintiff differently than similarly-situated employees of a different race (or religion, or sex, etc.). Thus, an African-American employee who qualified for a promotion, but was rejected in favor of a Caucasian employee, could establish an inference that the employer discriminated against the plaintiff because of his race. The employer must then produce evidence of a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the decision, such as that the Caucasian employee’s sales figures consistently exceeded the African-American employee’s, justifying the promotion. Now let’s apply these well-established principles of employment law to a theoretical investigation into a company’s two sets of employees — Hillary Clinton and her associates and Donald Trump and his associates — pretending for purposes of illustration that team Hillary is Caucasian and team Trump ais African-American. Let’s also assume that the comments were race-based instead of Trump-based. Here is Lisa Page’s text to Peter Strzok in that context: “That African-American is not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” And his response: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” That statement, if spoken in the context of an employment decision, would be the rarely existent direct evidence of racial animus. That the agents spoke about Trump instead changes nothing of import: It provides direct evidence of an illicit motive. That evidence is backed up with the additional circumstantial evidence consisting of anti-Trump and pro-Hillary messages exchanged by Page and Strzok and the other unnamed agents. Applying the indirect method of proof is equally damning. Hillary and Trump are similarly situated, yet in investigating allegations of illegality, the FBI approached the cases differently. Consider, for instance, the FBI’s approach to questioning witnesses. Following the FBI’s questioning of a tech person who had helped the Clintons at their Chappaqua residence, a text conversation between an FBI employee and an agent included this tidbit: FBI Employee: ‘boom…how did the [witness] go’ Agent 1: ‘Awesome. Lied his -ss off. Went from never inside the scif [sensitive compartmented information facility] at res, to looked in when it was being constructed, to removed the trash twice, to troubleshot the secure fax with HRC a couple times, to everytime there was a secure fax i did it with HRC. Ridic,’ FBI Employee: ‘would be funny if he was the only guy charged n this deal’ Agent 1: ‘I know. For 1001. Even if he said the truth and didnt have a clearance when handling the secure fax – aint noone gonna do sh-t’ In contrast, when the FBI interviewed Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, the agents reported that they did not believe Flynn had lied. Yet, the DOJ later charged Flynn with lying to investigators to force him to cooperate and hopefully reveal dirt on his boss. Is there a legitimate explanation for this disparate treatment? No. Consider, then, how these facts would look to a jury considering a race discrimination case in which an employer decided to investigate two employees suspected of theft. In interviewing witnesses to the events, the employer uses a velvet touch when questioning witnesses possessing information about the Caucasian employee (Hillary in our hypothetical), while applying an iron fist in interrogations of witnesses close to the African-American employee (Trump in our scenario.) It would involve race-based discrimination — just like the comparative handling of the Clinton and Trump investigations involved politically motivated discrimination.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 22, 2018 9:58:10 GMT -6
Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11 · 1h Obama and Clinton have gotten away with:
Uranium One Benghazi Solyndra Fast & Furious IRS targeting Cash to Iran Rigging a primary against Bernie Illegally storing emails Paying for a fake dossier Lying under oath Spying on Trump And Trump is the one under investigation? 🤔
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 22, 2018 15:38:03 GMT -6
www.politico.com/story/2018/06/22/robert-mueller-paul-manafort-trump-campaign-665898Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is seeking to prevent the defense for Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, from arguing to jurors that he was targeted for prosecution because of his role in Donald Trump’s presidential bid. In a courtfiling on Friday, prosecutors asked a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, to bar any selective prosecution claims during Manafort’s looming trial on tax evasion, bank fraud and other charges. “Manafort should … be precluded from arguing that he has been singled out for prosecution because of his position in the campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump, or otherwise asserting that he has been selectively prosecuted by the Special Counsel’s Office,” Mueller’s team wrote. Prosecutors noted that Manafort never filed a legal motion asking for the case to be dismissed on selective-prosecution grounds. “Courts have consistently held that claims of selective (or vindictive) prosecution must be presented to the court before trial and cannot be argued to the jury,” the government filing said. “The government’s reasons for initiating a prosecution have nothing to do with whether the evidence at trial proves the elements of the charged offenses, which is the sole question that the jury must answer.”
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 22, 2018 17:18:02 GMT -6
www.politico.com/story/2018/06/22/robert-mueller-paul-manafort-trump-campaign-665898Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is seeking to prevent the defense for Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman, from arguing to jurors that he was targeted for prosecution because of his role in Donald Trump’s presidential bid. In a courtfiling on Friday, prosecutors asked a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, to bar any selective prosecution claims during Manafort’s looming trial on tax evasion, bank fraud and other charges. “Manafort should … be precluded from arguing that he has been singled out for prosecution because of his position in the campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump, or otherwise asserting that he has been selectively prosecuted by the Special Counsel’s Office,” Mueller’s team wrote. Prosecutors noted that Manafort never filed a legal motion asking for the case to be dismissed on selective-prosecution grounds. “Courts have consistently held that claims of selective (or vindictive) prosecution must be presented to the court before trial and cannot be argued to the jury,” the government filing said. “The government’s reasons for initiating a prosecution have nothing to do with whether the evidence at trial proves the elements of the charged offenses, which is the sole question that the jury must answer.” Had he not been briefly involved with Trump he would have never been investigated. If it has nothing to do with Trump then why is a investigation of Trump looking into some supposedly not linked to Trump? They can't even get their lies straight.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 22, 2018 17:49:09 GMT -6
Manu Raju ✔ @mkraju Goodlatte issues subpoena to compel Peter Strzok to appear before House Judiciary next Wednesday morning for a deposition. Strzok has said he’d be willing to testify before Congress 6:14 PM - Jun 22, 2018
215
144 people are talking about this
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 22, 2018 18:01:58 GMT -6
Manu Raju ✔ @mkraju Goodlatte issues subpoena to compel Peter Strzok to appear before House Judiciary next Wednesday morning for a deposition. Strzok has said he’d be willing to testify before Congress 6:14 PM - Jun 22, 2018 215 144 people are talking about this Get him under oath and if he lies cuff his ass.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 23, 2018 11:17:45 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Jun 23, 2018 13:50:06 GMT -6
Conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch obtained IRS documents Thursday revealing backstabber Senator John McCain’s former staff director Henry Kerner urged the IRS, including the corrupt Lois Lerner, to engage in “financially ruinous” targeting of conservative Tea Party groups. Tom Fitton ✔ @tomfitton The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans. www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-irs-documents-revealing-mccains-subcommittee-staff-director-urged-irs-to-engage-in-financially-ruinous-targeting/ … 4:18 PM - Jun 21, 2018 ...... The Conservative Treehouse reported: Yesterday it was revealed that Henry J Kerner (Henry Kerner), as a former McCain senior staff official, was part of a bipartisan DC team who constructed the IRS weaponization program to target the Tea Party. That’s bad enough. However, a little more digging, you’re not going to believe this: the same guy who was attached to the prior investigations, is now in charge of all DC “corruption” and “whistle-blowing” cases, including the current FBI and DOJ corruption. Henry Kerner is Special Counsel in charge of all “whistle-blowing” witnesses and cases of government corruption. Henry Kerner controls the events as the lead official, the Special Counsel in charge of the Office of Special Counsel; and he is in the position to manipulate/control any investigative outcome. But wait, historic sunlight makes it much worse. Consider Kerner’s DC history: WASHINGTON – Mr. Kerner graduated from Harvard Law School and spent nearly 20 years working as a career prosecutor in California. After law school, he joined the staff of the House Oversight Committee, under Chairman Darrell Issa, the chief investigative committee of the United States House of Representatives. Under Chairman Issa, and later, Chairman Chaffetz, he led investigations of the Federal bureaucracy and fought on behalf of whistleblowers to protect American taxpayers. Mr. Kerner was the Staff Director under Ranking Member Sen. John McCain of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the lead investigative committee of Congress. He then became a Vice President at Cause of Action, a nonpartisan oversight group committed to exposing waste, fraud and abuse in the Federal Government and which has worked with whistleblower and good government groups throughout the country. (link) www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-henry-kerner-office-special-counsel/theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/22/now-it-all-starts-making-sense-deep-state-fixer-henry-john-kerner-the-cover-up-expert/
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 23, 2018 14:24:21 GMT -6
POLITICO: FBI turns over +1,400 pages of documents to House Judiciary and Oversight Committees regarding DOJ/FBI surveillance records involving/mentioning Trump campaign or administration 3:12 PM · Jun 23, 2018
Jack Posobiec🇺🇸 @jackposobiec · 6m How can they have 1400 pages on it when they claimed it never happened?
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Jun 23, 2018 16:01:00 GMT -6
Conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch obtained IRS documents Thursday revealing backstabber Senator John McCain’s former staff director Henry Kerner urged the IRS, including the corrupt Lois Lerner, to engage in “financially ruinous” targeting of conservative Tea Party groups. Tom Fitton ✔ @tomfitton The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans. www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-irs-documents-revealing-mccains-subcommittee-staff-director-urged-irs-to-engage-in-financially-ruinous-targeting/ … 4:18 PM - Jun 21, 2018 ...... The Conservative Treehouse reported: Yesterday it was revealed that Henry J Kerner (Henry Kerner), as a former McCain senior staff official, was part of a bipartisan DC team who constructed the IRS weaponization program to target the Tea Party. That’s bad enough. However, a little more digging, you’re not going to believe this: the same guy who was attached to the prior investigations, is now in charge of all DC “corruption” and “whistle-blowing” cases, including the current FBI and DOJ corruption. Henry Kerner is Special Counsel in charge of all “whistle-blowing” witnesses and cases of government corruption. Henry Kerner controls the events as the lead official, the Special Counsel in charge of the Office of Special Counsel; and he is in the position to manipulate/control any investigative outcome. But wait, historic sunlight makes it much worse. Consider Kerner’s DC history: WASHINGTON – Mr. Kerner graduated from Harvard Law School and spent nearly 20 years working as a career prosecutor in California. After law school, he joined the staff of the House Oversight Committee, under Chairman Darrell Issa, the chief investigative committee of the United States House of Representatives. Under Chairman Issa, and later, Chairman Chaffetz, he led investigations of the Federal bureaucracy and fought on behalf of whistleblowers to protect American taxpayers. Mr. Kerner was the Staff Director under Ranking Member Sen. John McCain of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the lead investigative committee of Congress. He then became a Vice President at Cause of Action, a nonpartisan oversight group committed to exposing waste, fraud and abuse in the Federal Government and which has worked with whistleblower and good government groups throughout the country. (link) www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-henry-kerner-office-special-counsel/theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/22/now-it-all-starts-making-sense-deep-state-fixer-henry-john-kerner-the-cover-up-expert/I never wish ill will on anyone but I will be so glad when this shit stain is gone. Scary to think he was almost president.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 23, 2018 19:00:54 GMT -6
Conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch obtained IRS documents Thursday revealing backstabber Senator John McCain’s former staff director Henry Kerner urged the IRS, including the corrupt Lois Lerner, to engage in “financially ruinous” targeting of conservative Tea Party groups. Tom Fitton ✔ @tomfitton The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans. www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-irs-documents-revealing-mccains-subcommittee-staff-director-urged-irs-to-engage-in-financially-ruinous-targeting/ … 4:18 PM - Jun 21, 2018 ...... The Conservative Treehouse reported: Yesterday it was revealed that Henry J Kerner (Henry Kerner), as a former McCain senior staff official, was part of a bipartisan DC team who constructed the IRS weaponization program to target the Tea Party. That’s bad enough. However, a little more digging, you’re not going to believe this: the same guy who was attached to the prior investigations, is now in charge of all DC “corruption” and “whistle-blowing” cases, including the current FBI and DOJ corruption. Henry Kerner is Special Counsel in charge of all “whistle-blowing” witnesses and cases of government corruption. Henry Kerner controls the events as the lead official, the Special Counsel in charge of the Office of Special Counsel; and he is in the position to manipulate/control any investigative outcome. But wait, historic sunlight makes it much worse. Consider Kerner’s DC history: WASHINGTON – Mr. Kerner graduated from Harvard Law School and spent nearly 20 years working as a career prosecutor in California. After law school, he joined the staff of the House Oversight Committee, under Chairman Darrell Issa, the chief investigative committee of the United States House of Representatives. Under Chairman Issa, and later, Chairman Chaffetz, he led investigations of the Federal bureaucracy and fought on behalf of whistleblowers to protect American taxpayers. Mr. Kerner was the Staff Director under Ranking Member Sen. John McCain of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the lead investigative committee of Congress. He then became a Vice President at Cause of Action, a nonpartisan oversight group committed to exposing waste, fraud and abuse in the Federal Government and which has worked with whistleblower and good government groups throughout the country. (link) www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-announces-intent-nominate-henry-kerner-office-special-counsel/theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/22/now-it-all-starts-making-sense-deep-state-fixer-henry-john-kerner-the-cover-up-expert/I never wish ill will on anyone but I will be so glad when this shit stain is gone. Scary to think he was almost president. I voted against this shit stain and got heckled. Don’t wish death on him by any means, but don’t like what he’s done at all. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Jun 23, 2018 19:03:12 GMT -6
Uh oh... (Visions of grandeur will get you every time. It’s Shakespearean) www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5233467/amp/Huma-Abedin-backed-emails-Anthony-Weiners-laptop.htmlEXCLUSIVE: Huma Abedin backed up her emails to Anthony Weiner's laptop after leaving the State Department – even though she said on oath and to FBI agents that she did no such thing An examination of emails released by the State Department shows that backup copies were created in the dates after Clinton left the State Department in 2013 The messages were archived from 'BBB Backup' and 'LoaderBackup' from a BlackBerry Bold 9700 The FBI discovered the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop after it was seized just weeks before the 2016 election At least five messages released this week were marked 'Classified' which included discussions on Israel and other Middle Eastern issues from 2010 - 2012 Huma Abedin had told FBI that she did not have a method of preserving the emails she exchanged on a private server with her boss She also claimed to have lost most of them as a result of the transition from the State Department - which she left on January 20, 2013 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by trumped on Jun 23, 2018 20:14:05 GMT -6
Uh oh... (Visions of grandeur will get you every time. It’s Shakespearean) www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5233467/amp/Huma-Abedin-backed-emails-Anthony-Weiners-laptop.htmlEXCLUSIVE: Huma Abedin backed up her emails to Anthony Weiner's laptop after leaving the State Department – even though she said on oath and to FBI agents that she did no such thing An examination of emails released by the State Department shows that backup copies were created in the dates after Clinton left the State Department in 2013 The messages were archived from 'BBB Backup' and 'LoaderBackup' from a BlackBerry Bold 9700 The FBI discovered the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop after it was seized just weeks before the 2016 election At least five messages released this week were marked 'Classified' which included discussions on Israel and other Middle Eastern issues from 2010 - 2012 Huma Abedin had told FBI that she did not have a method of preserving the emails she exchanged on a private server with her boss She also claimed to have lost most of them as a result of the transition from the State Department - which she left on January 20, 2013 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Why was there no mention of the DATTO backup by the IG?!!! (link: www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-email-server-fbi-platte-river-214521) politico.com/story/2015/10/… … DATTO realized they had a cloud server that had FULL backups of the Clinton emails. 🤔 Big League Politics Big League Politics @bigleaguepol · 5h Removed FBI Agent Peter Strzok Hid The Search Warrant For Weiner’s Laptop Emails FBI agent Peter Strzok emailed the draft copy of the Anthony Weiner search warrant to himself on his private email address days before the election, which allowed him to make changes to the warrant without being detected by FBI documentation. This revelation came out in the Michael Horowitz inspector general report. If Strzok had printed out the draft warrant at his office, it would be subject to official FBI records. But instead he sent it to his private email on October 29, which allowed him to print it off at home. Insiders believe that Strzok showed the draft warrant to other people, despite the warrant being under seal by a federal judge. The Anthony Weiner warrant ended up being limited in scope, leaving out some of the private email domains that Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin used to send each other classified information. “Did you (Strzok) print it at the printer at your house? Did you let your friend, the federal judge, or a reporter, look at it while you made changes? Did you let someone in the Hillary Clinton campaign look at it?,” wonders Chuck Marler, a longtime former FBI Special Surveillance Group member, to Big League Politics. Trending: Clinton Donor Clare Bronfman ‘Expects To Be Indicted’ In Sex Cult Child-Trafficking Case “It allowed him to circumvent the system so he could allow other people to look at it. On October 29, it was a draft. At some point, they made changes,” Marler said. The inspector general report makes clear the extent to which the FBI was trying to cover up the Weiner situation, with James Comey even stating that he did not know Weiner was married to Huma Abedin. Yeah right! The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under James Comey and Andrew McCabe sat on the revelation that Anthony Weiner possessed more than 300,000 relevant emails on his laptop including tons of Hillary Clinton-Huma Abedin emails dating back to 2007. Why? The report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz claims that the FBI shifted focus to the higher priority of the “Russia collusion” investigation, and that agents did not think the emails on Weiner’s laptop (many of them classified) would be “important.” The fact that Weiner had access to classified Clinton emails is stunning enough. Now, courtesy of the IG report, we know that Comey’s FBI were obviously complicit in covering up the revelation and using the “Russia” hoax to divert attention from Weiner. From the Horowitz Report: “As we describe in Chapter Nine of our report, the explanations we were given for the FBI’s failure to take immediate action on the Weiner laptop fell into four general categories: The FBI Midyear team was waiting for additional information about the contents of the laptop from NYO, which was not provided until late October; • The FBI Midyear team could not review the emails without additional legal authority, such as consent or a new search warrant; • The FBI Midyear team and senior FBI officials did not believe that the information on the laptop was likely to be significant; and • Key members of the FBI Midyear team had been reassigned to the investigation of Russian interference in the U.S. election, which was a higher priority…” bigleaguepolitics.com/peter-strzok-hid-the-search-warrant-for-weiners-laptop-emails/?utm_content=bufferb0c7a&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
|
|