|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 14:36:17 GMT -6
He's already been weaned off oxygen and common sense. He learned since he spews out garbage (and never reads any replies to him) posters finally stopped responding. He derailed every thread like a child with his name calling rants. When it was returned it just triggered him even worse. He has mental issues and I hope he gets some help. Not really that, they’re just what their Liberal Super PAC pays them to be. I.e. someone to go to online message boards to “correct” the narratives involving all things DNC, Clinton, etc. I posted articles on this back on the old LT site.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 14:39:01 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 14:39:45 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 14:40:27 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 14:58:24 GMT -6
www.politico.com/story/2018/05/14/russian-firm-robert-mueller-charge-disputed-585645The Justice Department, attorneys Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly wrote in a motion filed in federal court in Washington Monday, has “licensed a Special Counsel who for all practical political purposes cannot be fired, to indict a case that has absolutely nothing to do with any links or coordination between any candidate and the Russian Government.”
“The reason is obvious, and is political: to justify his own existence the Special Counsel has to indict a Russian — any Russian,” they added.[/i] Aside from serving as a vehicle to attack the prosecution, the new motion complains that Mueller’s case against the firm is legally flawed because it fails to allege that the company acted “willfully” in violating U.S. law. Typically, criminal election law violations require proof that the defendant knew about the legal requirement and intentionally ignored or evaded it. In the filing, Concord’s attorneys suggested that prosecutors are trying to dodge that rule, noting that DOJ had indicted a foreign firm “with no presence in the United States” for not complying with “certain regulatory requirements that are unknown even to most Americans.”
|
|
|
Post by ictsooner7 on May 14, 2018 15:02:35 GMT -6
He learned since he spews out garbage (and never reads any replies to him) posters finally stopped responding. He derailed every thread like a child with his name calling rants. When it was returned it just triggered him even worse. He has mental issues and I hope he gets some help. Not really that, they’re just what their Liberal Super PAC pays them to be. I.e. someone to go to online message boards to “correct” the narratives involving all things DNC, Clinton, etc. I posted articles on this back on the old LT site. You have actual brain damage. What "super liberal PAC"? You just made that shit up, like you and your party do 99% of the time. Look at the links you post - talk about being a mouth piece for rnc propaganda. Lemming
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 15:06:20 GMT -6
He learned since he spews out garbage (and never reads any replies to him) posters finally stopped responding. He derailed every thread like a child with his name calling rants. When it was returned it just triggered him even worse. He has mental issues and I hope he gets some help. Not really that, they’re just what their Liberal Super PAC pays them to be. I.e. someone to go to online message boards to “correct” the narratives involving all things DNC, Clinton, etc. I posted articles on this back on the old LT site. Pretty sure he is getting paid to disrupt. Dembot
|
|
|
Post by ictsooner7 on May 14, 2018 16:47:51 GMT -6
Not really that, they’re just what their Liberal Super PAC pays them to be. I.e. someone to go to online message boards to “correct” the narratives involving all things DNC, Clinton, etc. I posted articles on this back on the old LT site. Pretty sure he is getting paid to disrupt. Dembot You don't know shit about shit. Look at your posts, trump sycophant bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 17:29:19 GMT -6
Not really that, they’re just what their Liberal Super PAC pays them to be. I.e. someone to go to online message boards to “correct” the narratives involving all things DNC, Clinton, etc. I posted articles on this back on the old LT site. You have actual brain damage. What "super liberal PAC"? You just made that shit up, like you and your party do 99% of the time. Look at the links you post - talk about being a mouth piece for rnc propaganda. Lemming www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.htmlWhen the Internet’s legions of Hillary hecklers steal away to chat rooms and Facebook pages to vent grievances about Clinton, express revulsion toward Clinton and launch attacks on Clinton, they now may find themselves in a surprising place – confronted by a multimillion dollar super PAC working with Clinton. Hillary Clinton's well-heeled backers have opened a new frontier in digital campaigning, one that seems to have been inspired by some of the Internet's worst instincts. Correct the Record, a super PAC coordinating with Clinton's campaign, is spending some $1 million to find and confront social media users who post unflattering messages about the Democratic front-runner. ..... At least you’re employed,(granted not very good at it).
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 17:33:53 GMT -6
thehill.com/opinion/white-house/387625-mueller-may-have-a-conflict-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarchThey said FBI agents courted Deripaska in 2009 in a series of secret hotel meetings in Paris, Vienna, Budapest and Washington. Agents persuaded the aluminum industry magnate to underwrite the mission. The Russian billionaire insisted the operation neither involve nor harm his homeland. “We knew he was paying for his team helping us, and that probably ran into the millions,” a U.S. official involved in the operation confirmed. One agent who helped court Deripaska was Andrew McCabe, the recently fired FBI deputy director who played a seminal role starting the Trump-Russia case, multiple sources confirm. Deripaska’s lawyer says the Russian ultimately spent $25 million assembling a private search and rescue team that worked with Iranian contacts under the FBI’s watchful eye. Photos and videos indicating Levinson was alive were uncovered. Then in fall 2010, the operation secured an offer to free Levinson. The deal was scuttled, however, when the State Department become uncomfortable with Iran’s terms, according to Deripaska’s lawyer and the Levinson family. FBI officials confirmed State hampered their efforts. ....... We tried to turn over every stone we could to rescue Bob, but every time we started to get close, the State Department seemed to always get in the way,” said Robyn Gritz, the retired agent who supervised the Levinson case in 2009, when Deripaska first cooperated, but who left for another position in 2010 before the Iranian offer arrived. ........ Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told me he believes Mueller has a conflict of interest because his FBI previously accepted financial help from a Russian that is, at the very least, a witness in the current probe. “The real question becomes whether it was proper to leave [Deripaska] out of the Manafort indictment, and whether that omission was to avoid the kind of transparency that is really required by the law,” Dershowitz said. Melanie Sloan, a former Clinton Justice Department lawyer and longtime ethics watchdog, told me a “far more significant issue” is whether the earlier FBI operation was even legal: “It’s possible the bureau’s arrangement with Mr. Deripaska violated the Antideficiency Act, which prohibits the government from accepting voluntary services.” George Washington University constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley agreed: “If the operation with Deripaska contravened federal law, this figure could be viewed as a potential embarrassment for Mueller. The question is whether he could implicate Mueller in an impropriety.”
|
|
|
Post by ictsooner7 on May 14, 2018 17:58:59 GMT -6
You have actual brain damage. What "super liberal PAC"? You just made that shit up, like you and your party do 99% of the time. Look at the links you post - talk about being a mouth piece for rnc propaganda. Lemming www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.htmlWhen the Internet’s legions of Hillary hecklers steal away to chat rooms and Facebook pages to vent grievances about Clinton, express revulsion toward Clinton and launch attacks on Clinton, they now may find themselves in a surprising place – confronted by a multimillion dollar super PAC working with Clinton. Hillary Clinton's well-heeled backers have opened a new frontier in digital campaigning, one that seems to have been inspired by some of the Internet's worst instincts. Correct the Record, a super PAC coordinating with Clinton's campaign, is spending some $1 million to find and confront social media users who post unflattering messages about the Democratic front-runner. ..... At least you’re employed,(granted not very good at it). Again, you don't know shit about shit. HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON One could ask how much you are getting paid to suck for trump.
|
|
scout
Quarantined
Posts: 58
|
Post by scout on May 14, 2018 18:07:33 GMT -6
It's funny. I am happy to see a new post in a thread like this only to find out that it is because of an ict post. What a disappointment. I really need to look at the last poster column and not the topic.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 19:50:35 GMT -6
www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-clinton-digital-trolling-20160506-snap-htmlstory.htmlWhen the Internet’s legions of Hillary hecklers steal away to chat rooms and Facebook pages to vent grievances about Clinton, express revulsion toward Clinton and launch attacks on Clinton, they now may find themselves in a surprising place – confronted by a multimillion dollar super PAC working with Clinton. Hillary Clinton's well-heeled backers have opened a new frontier in digital campaigning, one that seems to have been inspired by some of the Internet's worst instincts. Correct the Record, a super PAC coordinating with Clinton's campaign, is spending some $1 million to find and confront social media users who post unflattering messages about the Democratic front-runner. ..... At least you’re employed,(granted not very good at it). Again, you don't know shit about shit. HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON HILARY CLINTON One could ask how much you are getting paid to suck for trump. Proven wrong, stomp feet like a temperamental child. Standard operating procedure for the left. As for your Clinton obsession, check with former President Obama who enjoyed blaming everything on Bush for seven of his eight years in office. But please keep parroting Soros’ talking points. Unfortunately, it’s the only thing your halfway decent at.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 19:59:22 GMT -6
Back on topic: www.dailywire.com/news/30632/bombshell-muellers-fbi-worked-closely-russian-ryan-saavedraA report released on Monday raises new and serious legal issues for special counsel Robert Mueller and provides evidence of a possible conflict of interest in his role overseeing the Russia investigation. The Hill reports: thehill.com/opinion/white-house/387625-mueller-may-have-a-conflict-and-it-leads-directly-to-a-russian-oligarchIn 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, Robert Levinson, captured in Iran while working for the CIA in 2007. Yes, that’s the same Deripaska who has surfaced in Mueller’s current investigation and who was recently sanctioned by the Trump administration. More than a dozen participants involved in the Levinson mission confirmed its existence to The Hill and confirmed that Mueller was kept directly informed of the operation. Officials say that Mueller's FBI courted the Russian billionaire in 2009 in a series of secret meetings and persuaded him to finance the operation. "We knew he was paying for his team helping us, and that probably ran into the millions," a U.S. official directly involved with the mission said. The Hill notes: One agent who helped court Deripaska was Andrew McCabe, the recently fired FBI deputy director who played a seminal role starting the Trump-Russia case, multiple sources confirmed. A lawyer representing Deripaska said the billionaire spent approximately $25 million to assemble a private team that worked with Iranian contacts to try to rescue Levinson before then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton killed the deal. "Deripaska’s efforts came very close to success," said former federal prosecutor David McGee, who represents Levinson’s family. "We were told at one point that the terms of Levinson’s release had been agreed to by Iran and the U.S. and included a statement by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pointing a finger away from Iran. At the last minute, Secretary Clinton decided not to make the agreed-on statement." ........ If true,(which is a big possibility), this would damage Mueller even more & open the door to possible legal action against him.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 20:05:50 GMT -6
This is why Trump never shut it down, he knew he had no collusion yet also knew Dems would spend every waking minute on awild goose chase while he was undoing Obamas mistakes and creating prosperity. Bonus is Dems thought Russia would be their midterm platform and now they have none lol.
MAGA KAG
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 20:08:09 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 20:12:47 GMT -6
Liberal media reaction:
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 21:49:44 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 21:51:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 21:57:45 GMT -6
This is gonna be huge:
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 22:10:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 22:32:23 GMT -6
Robert Mueller never mentioned in his Special Counsel findings that he had worked with Deripaska in the past.
Monday night on Hannity Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) reminded Sean that FBI Director Chris Wray would not tell Congress if Derispaska was involved with the Russian dossier.
Here is that exchange between Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) asking Christopher Wray about Deripaska:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 22:33:44 GMT -6
Tonight Rep. Gaetz reminded Sean Hannity of the exchange back in February 2018.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 14, 2018 22:48:51 GMT -6
John Solomon,(the Hill reporter),further explains that Oleg Deripaska and Paul Manafort previously had a falling out therefore became enemies.
Deripaska hates Paul Manafort and he still told FBI agents their Russian collusion theory is “preposterous.”
This happened two months before the election and before the FISA application on Carter Page, John Solomon points out.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 14, 2018 23:16:50 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 15, 2018 0:34:52 GMT -6
Wow these fucks are so dirty this is nbggest scandal ever trying to steal American election:
NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 1. So @jsolomonreports broke some big news on @ingrahamangle tonight. We KNEW Oleg Deripaska was involved with the coup. He was the one who gave the Steele dossier to Kramer, McCains aid. Mccain gave it to Comey hoping to F @realdonaldtrump over. 10:05 PM · May 14, 2018 827 Retweets 1,111 Likes NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h Replying to @nameredacted7 2. But Jon put out some key details. He gave further details of Deripaska's relationship w Fired FBJ Dep Dir McCabe: in 2010-11 mccabe & 2 other agents approached Deripaska to help the FBI try to get Bob Levinson out of Iran. 3 122 280 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 3. Bob Levinson is a former @fbi agent who worked for the bureau for 30 years & specialized in counter terrorism. He went missing on Kish Island Iran working as a contractor for CIA.
Bob Levinson has been missing in Iran for 11 years sun-sentinel.com 3 117 256 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 4. @vabelle2010 led the effort to find him. She was assigned to FBI CT & had worked w FBI/CIA JTTF so this was her speciality. NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 5. McCabe & 2 other agents under Director muellers approval went to Oleg Deripaska to ask for help. Oleg Deripaska agreed and spent several million of his own dollars in the effort. 1 87 237 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 6. It appears (careful to point out my speculation) that the quid pro quo was sanctions relief. Deripaska thought free travel to/fr US was worth potentially $10 bil to him. 4 70 212 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 7. In the end, the FBI blew him off after Hillary Clinton's state Dept killed the deal for Bobs release. This couldn't have sat well w Oleg. 7 81 231 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 8. Now, right here we have a serious conflict of interest for special counsel mueller who is investigating Deripaska. And other targets. 3h 9. Fast forward: @jsolomonreports broke tonight, McCabe & 2 other agents again approached Deripaska proposing he help them frame @realdonaldtrump for Russian collusion. 5 178 299 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 10. Deripaska tells them 'you're crazy, that's ridiculous.' McCabes response: 'keep an open mind'. Let's unpack that remark! 2 99 251 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 11. We KNOW at a later time Deripaska gave mccain the Steele dossier. He must have agreed to help McCabe. But what was McCabe referring to? The four known moles in the campaign? Manafort, gates, popadopoulos, Carter Page? Or outside spy Stefan Harper? 7 111 239 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 12. Or was McCabe referring to FusionGPS & the dossier? Or all of the above? Keep in mind this comes out IMMEDIATELY following @chuckgrassley written demand that 2nd FBI agent Pientka who was at @genflynn interview testify under record about it & 302s 4 85 233 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 13. The 302s are important. @nick_Falco @the_War_Economy @johnwhuber all documented Strzok-Page texts discussing modifying F302s. Flynn's fd302s. Stick w me here. 3 80 231 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 14. As @drawandstrike just pointed out minutes ago @genflynn was on open line & KNEW the calls to ambo kislyak were recorded & FBI had transcripts. He had no reason to lie. None. He didn't lie. 1 102 274 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 15. Comey, McCabe (at time he was acting director), Strzok all confirm @genflynn wasn't deceptive, didn't lie. Comey & McCabe said so UNDER OATH.
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 15, 2018 0:36:50 GMT -6
Continued:
NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 16. So sometime between @genflynn interview and Strzok & Page going to team mueller those 302s had to change or theres no charge for lying. Go back to the texts 'Andy approves F302 launch'. 3 93 242 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 17. Now, Senator @chuckgrassley has in writing demanded: transcripts of @genflynn calls w Amb Kislyak all docs FBI has on this including all copies of the 302s including the originals & 2nd agent present during interview to examine, explain & testify under oath. 1 84 241 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 18. Link to @chuckgrassley written formal request:
Grassley Demands DOJ and FBI Turn Over All Info on Flynn | Sara A. Carter saraacarter.com 2 80 223 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 19. Circle back: where does this get Oleg Deripaska? Under investigation by mueller, hung out to dry as a scape goat by McCabe & pissed. He wanted sanctions gone instead WH foundout he's involved and sanctioned him personally & professionally. 3 75 220 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 20. Get this: Oleg Deripaska, per @jsolomonreports, offered to TESTIFY, under oath before congress to all this. He did NOT ask for immunity or legal protection to do so. If I were McCabe, Strzok, Comey & baker I'd be scared right now.NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 ·
NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 21. Now consider that @devinnunes is going full speed ahead pursuing this FBI coup. He knows about the 4 moles, and he knows about Halper. Days after subpoenaing DOJ for docs about Stefan Harper, LawfareBlog, an extreme left 'think tank' immediately began attacking him. 2 130 265 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 22. For instance, this 'former IC Lawyer' CNN correspondent & lawfareblog editor immediately smeared @devinnunes Susan Hennessey @susan_Hennessey This is a hugely significant story. DOJ and the IC do not trust the HPSCI chair to protect sources and methods that directly risk human lives. Nunes simply cannot continue to serve in the role and Speaker Ryan is wrong to not remove him and appoint a suitable choice like Conaway. (link:
) twitter.com/mkraju/status/… Show this thread
NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 23. This was put out in TANDEM w a NYT released hit piece they KNEW was inaccurate- Representative Devin Nunes, Republican of California and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has escalated his demands to Justice Department officials in recent weeks. Suspicions, Demands and Threats: Devin Nunes vs. the Justice Dept. mobile.nytimes.com 3 72 207 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 24. But Catherine Herridge of @foxnews set the record straight tonight:
Nunes, Gowdy accuse DOJ of launching anonymous attacks on congressional investigator foxnews.com 6 124 279 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 25. Compare that lawfareblog tweet w this section of the Herridge article; Herridge is NEVER wrong. Her accuracy is unparalleled. 2h
NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 3h 26. Remember, she's a former IC Community Lawyer. What did James Baker do before @comey hired him as @fbi Gen Counsel & Dir Wray fired him for leaking & participating in the coup against @realdonaldtrump ?
27. Turns out, baker was former lawyer in DOJ NSD who helped author FISA laws & DOJ & IC procedures. Yeah a handy guy to have around if abusing FISA to stage a coup and frame a president. cc: @realdonaldtrump JamesBaker James Baker brookings.edu 3 110 220 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 2h 28. So now that @fbi fired Baker, where did he land? Surprise, surprise!
An Announcement: James Baker lawfareblog.com 5 78 182 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 2h 29. Now let's tie it together: who did @comey leak classified memos to he stole from the @fbi after being fired? This guy:
drichman lawfareblog.com 2 88 171 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 2h 30. Daniel Richman is an interesting guy. He's evolved fr Comey's 'lawyer friend & college lawprofessor' to a Special Govt Employee personally hired by Comey, given a clearance & worked on HRC cases & the @realdonaldtrump counter intelligence case Strzok & McCabe opened. 1 73 170 NameRedacted7 NameRedacted7 @nameredacted7 · 2h 31. Yes he was completely outside of FBI normal channels & answered only to Dir Comey.
Comey's memo leak contact had 'special government employee' status at FBI foxnews.com
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 15, 2018 1:58:16 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on May 15, 2018 4:24:44 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by trumped on May 15, 2018 9:36:49 GMT -6
Its all starting to unravel
|
|