|
Post by sooner98 on Mar 25, 2019 7:26:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Mar 25, 2019 7:28:14 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:13:37 GMT -6
Time to see what’s hiding on the other side: Special prosecutor, round two: And the Democrats will fight that to the death as it will reveal things they don’t want revealed.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:18:04 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:20:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:37:40 GMT -6
Video at link: www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/03/25/dem-rep-katie-hill-claims-party-has-highly-suspicious-evidence-mueller-wasnt-covering/Monday on CNN’s “New Day,” a member of the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Katie Hill (D-CA) said there is “suspicious” evidence that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation “was not covering” related to President Donald Trump’s time in office. Hill said, “I think everyone needs to kind of slow their roll on this whole thing because right now we have evidence from Mueller, a direct quote from Mueller that there was direct interference by the Russians in the election. We’ve known that for a while. What we’ve seen since Trump took office is that even beforehand he said he was encouraging Russia to release the e-mails, to find those 30,000 e-mails. Now we have to say, ‘OK, fine. He didn’t directly coordinate with Russia moving forward.'” She continued, “But now we have evidence over the last two years that the Mueller investigation was not covering that is highly, highly suspicious. Both on the influence by foreign entities that have directly had part with our foreign policy, but also on so many other things.” She added, “We’re dealing with the security clearances issue, possibly giving nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. We’re dealing with the fact that we’ve got thousands of children that haven’t been reunited with their families and so many issues that we’ve got to continue our investigations on. And it’s just not related to the Mueller report.”
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Mar 25, 2019 11:43:15 GMT -6
Time to see what’s hiding on the other side: Special prosecutor, round two: And the Democrats will fight that to the death as it will reveal things they don’t want revealed. Looks like Graham has called for a Special Council into the origin of the investigation, and Nunes says he has evidence that the Dems and Obama admin officials actually started cooking this up in 2015!! Which tells me they were just looking for someone to pin it on....Bernie maybe? Or whomever else the Pubs might have offered up. What I want to know is who sent all these Russians to attempt to recruit members of Trump's campaign? I want to know more about Stefan Harper and why he set up his meeting with Popodopolous and Page. Was it the Obama admin trying to trap and recruit Trump admin officials, or the Russians? And thats just the tip of the iceberg.... How can the Dems fight it when they are all for "complete transparency?" If we can get them on tape saying "no more investigations!" with Trump saying "I think you tried to overhrow me, lets investigate to find out if thats true," I think the average person/moderate is going to side with Trump, esp due to Page/Strozok, McCabe and Comey's actions. Many who didnt believe a word Trump said are now re-evaluating who they believe and trust, and while they may not now trust Trump like someone who has stood by him since day 1, they trust him significantly more than they did this time last week. And, thats something we can build on.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:43:16 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/25/dershowitz-decries-muellers-hedge-on-obstruction-thats-good-for-a-law-review-article/Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz called out Department of Justice special counsel Robert Mueller for not offering definitive language in his report regarding alleged obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump. According to Dershowitz, Mueller had a duty to come to a conclusion on the question of obstruction but failed to do so based on the letter issued to Congress by Attorney General William Barr. If he wanted to hedge his bets and he refused to come to a decision, he ought to go work for a hedge fund,” he said. “The job of a prosecutor is to evaluate the evidence on all sides and then come to a conclusion. This was especially important in the obstruction of justice part of the case because Rod Rosenstein should not be making any decisions related to obstruction of justice because he was involved in the firing of [FBI Director James] Comey and he has his own interests in one way rather than another way.” “He was wrong not to say unequivocally we’ve looked at the evidence and there is no case for obstruction,” Dershowitz added. “You can’t obstruct justice if you engage in your constitutionally authorized acts – firing, pardoning, helping the Justice Department make decisions. That should have been the end of the inquiry.” Dershowitz goes on to liken Mueller’s determination on obstruction to a law review article. “[W]hat we don’t want to hear from Mueller is a law review article – ‘On the one hand, on the other hand,’” Dershowitz said. “That’s good for a law review article. But from a prosecutor we want, ‘No, we’re not indicting.’ That’s it. But I think the end result is what the facts pointed toward.”
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:48:15 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/25/gops-mccarthy-demands-adam-schiff-step-down-as-house-intel-chairman/House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy on Monday (R-CA) called on Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) ― who has continually advanced the hoax claim that President Donald Trump conspired with Russia’s government ― to resign as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee after special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation concluded there was no proof of any Trump campaign collusion. “[Schiff] owes the American public an apology,” McCarthy told Politico. “Schiff has met the standard that he has imposed on other members of Congress of when they should step back from their positions. He has exceeded that standard, and there is no question he should step down from the Intel chairmanship.” White House official Kellyanne Conway went a step further than McCarthy Monday morning, calling on Schiff not only to step down from his powerful chairmanship, but from Congress as well. “He ought to resign today,” Conway said of Schiff in an interview with Fox & Friends. “He’s been on every TV show 50 times a day for practically the last two years, promising Americans that this president would either be impeached or indicted.” “Adam Schiff should resign. He has no right as somebody who has been peddling a lie, day after day after day, unchallenged and not under oath,” she added. “Somebody should have put him under oath and said ‘you have evidence, where is it’?
|
|
|
Post by thievingmagpie on Mar 25, 2019 11:49:45 GMT -6
Libs' lunch today:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 11:54:35 GMT -6
Celebrity reaction:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 12:01:55 GMT -6
N/A
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 12:04:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 12:14:59 GMT -6
“I think Nixon had shame,” Matthews said on “Morning Joe” as co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski oohed and ahhed. “It may have not been moral shame, but it was political shame.”
“He knew he blew it. He got caught up in this back and forth, dirty tricks versus dirty tricks, worse dirty tricks, worse than that dirty trick. He got caught up in that escalation of that dirty politics, going back to the 40s. … And he got caught, and he knew it, and he cried, and he left. Trump doesn’t have that faculty,” Matthews said.
“No,” Mika agreed. “He doesn’t have shame or empathy.”
Yes, you read that right. Trump was investigated for 675 days by special counsel Robert Mueller and a team of 19 lawyers. Despite 2,800 subpoenas and 500 witness interviews, the counsel’s office found no evidence “that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate” conspired or “knowingly coordinated” with Russians during the 2016 campaign. The counsel also cleared Team Trump of allegations that they conspired with Russians to hack and release Democrats’ emails.
But Matthews thinks that Trump should act like Nixon — who was so guilty he resigned rather than wait for the Senate to convict him of charges and oust him from office.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 12:18:01 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 12:23:06 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/03/25/hirono-mueller-report-does-not-change-the-disaster-that-is-this-presidency/amp/Monday on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said even though special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation found that the 2016 Trump campaign did not collude with the Russian government, it does not change the “disaster that is this presidency.” Hirono said, “I think both Mueller and Barr should appear, especially as all we get is a summary of the Mueller report which we do not know how long it was it. And I did ask Barr during his hearing whether or not we were just going to get the summary of the Mueller report and that’s what we’ve gotten so far, a four-page summary, but I had said last week that I was particularly interested in Mueller’s analysis of whether or not there was obstruction of justice, because we saw this going on in front of our eyes.” She added, “So again, you know, this is all in the context of the disaster that is the Trump administration. So whether it be the cozy relationship that he has with Putin and other questionable leaders throughout the world and mainly people who are strong men or you have the Muslim ban, you have the trying to eliminate health care from millions of people, you have the disastrous tax bill that gave 1.5 trillion to the richest in our country. So this is all in the context of a disaster that is this presidency, and those things do not go away just because he thinks that he’s been totally exonerated. You know, this doesn’t make him a good president, not by a stretch.”
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 13:15:40 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/45072/republicans-escalate-calls-adam-schiffs-ashe-schowSchiff has, for more than two years, been claiming to have evidence that Trump conspired with Russians to steal the 2016 election. 1. On Sunday, Schiff told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that there was “significant evidence of collusion,” even though the special counsel determined there was “no evidence that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired with the Russians to influence the election, despite offers by the Russians to do so.” 2. In March 2018, Schiff wrote in his “Minority Views” response to the Republican-led House Intelligence investigation into Russian collusion (which also found no collusion) that the committee’s “findings are misleading and unsupported by the facts and the investigative record.” 3. In February 2018, Schiff claimed there was “ample evidence” that Trump colluded with Russia. He was speaking at a breakfasted hosted by the Christian Science Monitor when he said: "There is already, in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you're willing to see it.” 4. In March 2017, Schiff said on “Meet the Press” that there was “circumstantial evidence of collusion” and “direct evidence… of deception.” 5. Also in March 2017, and just a few days after simply saying there was “circumstantial evidence,” Schiff told MSNBC that there was “more than circumstantial evidence” – and he had seen it. Schiff has, as Conway mentioned, made numerous appearances on TV over the past few years to claim that Trump colluded with the Russians. He has offered no evidence other than what was already known and apparently dismissed by the Mueller investigation to back up his claims. ......... www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/03/24/schiff_there_is_still_significant_evidence_of_collusion.htmlwww.dailywire.com/news/45041/no-collusion-attorney-general-william-barr-emily-zanottiintelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/minorityviews.pdfwww.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/14/adam-schiff-there-ample-evidence-collusion-between-trump-campaign-russians/336786002/www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/schiff-more-circumstantial-evidence-trump-associates-colluded-russia-n737446
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Mar 25, 2019 14:06:31 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Mar 25, 2019 14:49:20 GMT -6
Trumps about to throw haymakers from every direction on this deal. And he should. He’ll prob take it too far and piss some followers off, but if the end result is the (temporary) end to the deep state, I’m down with drastic actions provided they are Constitutional. Without question, we need another Special Council. We also need to have open conversations about the power of the MSM and the top tech companies, and their ability to change election outcomes by tailoring to a pre set narrative.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Mar 25, 2019 17:23:16 GMT -6
“I think Nixon had shame,” Matthews said on “Morning Joe” as co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski oohed and ahhed. “It may have not been moral shame, but it was political shame.” “He knew he blew it. He got caught up in this back and forth, dirty tricks versus dirty tricks, worse dirty tricks, worse than that dirty trick. He got caught up in that escalation of that dirty politics, going back to the 40s. … And he got caught, and he knew it, and he cried, and he left. Trump doesn’t have that faculty,” Matthews said. “No,” Mika agreed. “He doesn’t have shame or empathy.” Yes, you read that right. Trump was investigated for 675 days by special counsel Robert Mueller and a team of 19 lawyers. Despite 2,800 subpoenas and 500 witness interviews, the counsel’s office found no evidence “that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate” conspired or “knowingly coordinated” with Russians during the 2016 campaign. The counsel also cleared Team Trump of allegations that they conspired with Russians to hack and release Democrats’ emails. But Matthews thinks that Trump should act like Nixon — who was so guilty he resigned rather than wait for the Senate to convict him of charges and oust him from office. Hard to believe that he used to sit in for Rush. Sadly these people have never taken their feet off the gas. It continues to be a 24/7 attack. And, as usual, whether it's true or not doesn't seem to much matter.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Mar 25, 2019 17:24:54 GMT -6
Where's Meathead? I saw his fat face out there yelping about something.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Mar 25, 2019 17:29:54 GMT -6
Here we go. Read in terrified voice.
Don't you think if all these "crimes" are in the report that someone would have gotten charged?
And as a bonus
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Mar 25, 2019 19:02:45 GMT -6
On Tucker Carlson, Lee Greenwald (a liberal and founder of the internet) was on tonight and hit the nail on the head: MSNBC was on the verge of collapse before Russiagate. They propagated a lie for their own profit, at the expense of the American People. They kept respected and credentialed liberals off the network to pretend there was no liberal dissent to the Russia story they were pushing. Worse, the lessons learned (and propagated by FOX) during the WMD fiasco: that you don’t trust intelligence sources without evidence, were blown completely out of the water when the MSM not only used people like Clapper and Brennan and Comey as sources, they hired them to come shape the narrative on air...career disinformation agents steering the ship...literal State TV. Even worse, there is no accountability or repercussions for these actions. In fact, they are monetarily benefited to stay the course.
It all makes me sick man. I don’t think the govt should interfere in the press, but something has to be done. I’m looking for ideas that aren’t Orwellian.
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Mar 25, 2019 19:11:04 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 19:50:51 GMT -6
Ronna McDaniel: It’s been a coordinated effort to delegitimize he 206 election… And to see Chairman Schiff of the House Intelligence Committee and to see Nadler say that the president is guilty of collusion. Think about what that means as Americans are sitting at home seeing people who are privy to the investigation, seeing the top secret documentations saying that our president was guilty of collusion.
Lou Dobbs: Lying through their teeth.
Ronna McDaniel: Time and time again on TV. They should be removed from their chairmanships. They owe the American people an apology. ......
I agree with the RNC Chair on this.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 25, 2019 19:54:33 GMT -6
And it gets better:
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 26, 2019 2:02:07 GMT -6
Backpedaling: www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/25/john-brennan-ex-cia-chief-offers-mea-culpa-on-trum/Former CIA chief John O. Brennan now says his months of attacks on President Trump may have been based on “bad information.” One of the president’s harshest critics had a muted tone on Monday as he discussed special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” No evidence was found to support the claim that Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign “conspired or coordinated” with Russia. “Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was,” Mr. Brennan told host Joe Scarborough. “I am relieved that it’s been determined there was not a criminal conspiracy with the Russian government over our election.” Mr. Brennan said in December 2018, for instance, that Mr. Trump should prepare for the “forthcoming exposure of your malfeasance & corruption.” “We need an actual leader — our Nation’s future is at stake,” he tweeted Dec. 31.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 26, 2019 2:05:37 GMT -6
www.infowars.com/trump-administration-sends-list-of-russian-collusion-liars-to-tv-producers/The memo accuses the above of “lying to the American people by vigorously and repeatedly claiming there was evidence of collusion.” “They made many of these false claims, without evidence, on your airwaves,” the memo adds, before giving an example for each of the individuals named. The memo then asks TV producers to think twice before booking the same guests again. “Moving forward, we ask that you employ basic journalistic standards when booking such guests to appear anywhere in your universe of productions,” states the memo, adding, “At a minimum, if these guests do reappear, you should replay the prior statements and challenge them to provide the evidence which prompted them to make the wild claims in the first place.”
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 26, 2019 2:14:55 GMT -6
Rudy Giuliani demanded in a fiery debate Monday that CNN host Chris Cuomo apologize for his coverage and his network’s coverage of the Russian collusion investigation.
It’s not very clever. You guys have tortured this man for two years with collusion and nobody has apologized for it. Before we talk about obstruction, apologize!” Giuliani demanded. Cuomo fired back, “Not a chance,” before Trump’s attorney continued his monologue into the treatment of President Donald Trump.
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Mar 26, 2019 2:43:41 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/03/25/maddow-has-15-questions-for-the-barr-report-we-do-not-have-the-mueller-report/amp/Monday on MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show,” host Rachel Maddow expressed her dissatisfaction with Attorney General William Barr’s letter to Congress summarizing the report of the findings from Department of Justice special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe. Maddow deemed Barr’s letter “The Barr Report” and spent a good portion of her program explaining the 15 questions she had about the report. Questions as follows: 1. Why did Mueller not decide on obstruction of justice? 2. Did Mueller expect Barr to decide on obstruction? 3. Should Barr have decided on obstruction? 4. Did Mueller want to protect a future grand jury? 5. Why did Barr consult the DOJ office of legal counsel before deciding about obstruction? 6. What will be briefed to the intelligence committees and Gang of Eight? 7. Was there a full investigation of Trump’s intent regarding obstruction? 8. Were Trump’s finances part of the investigation? 9. Will we see the Mueller investigation scope memo? 10. Will we see Trump’s written responses to Mueller? 11. Will the Mueller report be released? 12. Will Mueller testify to Congress? 13. Will Congress see Mueller’s underlying evidence? 14. Will ongoing investigations be affected? 15. Will Trump recognize Russia attacked our election?
|
|