|
Post by oilsooner on Nov 29, 2018 16:23:25 GMT -6
I am 100 percent confident he did not collude with a foreign government. Mueller is coming up with all of these indictments for "lying" about unimportant details, and two dozen mysterious, faceless Russians to pad his stats, so that the leftist dolts can all say "See, look, this isn't a witch hunt! Mueller has now indicted 50 people! Trump has to be guilty too! IMPEACH!!!" Meanwhile, zero evidence of collusion. Two years later, and the collusion train hasn't even left the station. I am also pretty confident. There is the possibility that Meuller has something that he hasnt shown, but we will know that once he files his report. Probably the day before, honestly. If he doesnt have irrefutable proof of collusion, there is no doubt in my mind that he will paint a picture of potential collusion, and try to allude to it being there, but just out of his grasp. He doesnt really have to though. The left will take whatever scraps they are given, and paint that picasso themselves. They'd love the credibility, but they dont need it. I think the proof for that is in-your-face and pretty overwhelming.
|
|
|
Post by Boots on Nov 29, 2018 20:57:15 GMT -6
“At the end of the day, the case was not a cliff-hanger; despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn’t a prosecutable case,” he said. “The hard part was whether to offer unprecedented transparency about our thinking. I explain to our alumni that I struggled with that part, but decided . . . to announce it in the way we did — with extraordinary transparency and without any kind of coordination.” - James Comey September 6, 2016
Former FBI Director James Comey has filed a motion in federal court in Washington to quash a congressional subpoena issued just before Thanksgiving soliciting his testimony on the FBI's actions leading up to the 2016 election.- CNN, today
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 29, 2018 22:09:58 GMT -6
Help me out as I don't want to be wrong again. Is the Congress that Cohen is guilty of lying to the same one Hillary lied to?
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Nov 29, 2018 22:22:05 GMT -6
Help me out as I don't want to be wrong again. Is the Congress that Cohen is guilty of lying to the same one Hillary lied to? Yes. You and I can see it, and if we had anything resembling a competent Special Counsel, they would see it too.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Nov 30, 2018 6:33:17 GMT -6
“At the end of the day, the case was not a cliff-hanger; despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn’t a prosecutable case,” he said. “The hard part was whether to offer unprecedented transparency about our thinking. I explain to our alumni that I struggled with that part, but decided . . . to announce it in the way we did — with extraordinary transparency and without any kind of coordination.” - James Comey September 6, 2016 Former FBI Director James Comey has filed a motion in federal court in Washington to quash a congressional subpoena issued just before Thanksgiving soliciting his testimony on the FBI's actions leading up to the 2016 election.- CNN, today “I love transparency!!” (Provided I am in control and define what “transparency” is) And the one sided nature of (Comey’s best spook bud) Muellers investigation is a whole other issue. A very sad era for our country, indeed.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 5, 2018 19:17:36 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 8, 2018 17:05:02 GMT -6
Comey says the Trump investigation was never political and Obama never ordered an investigation. Good enough for me.
amazing the number of times the brilliant Comey replied that he couldn't remember.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 11, 2018 4:08:01 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 11, 2018 15:37:43 GMT -6
Yo, why did Levin’s channel pick up Glen Beck? I can’t stand that ass clown. Curious to see where the uranium one thing goes.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 11, 2018 17:44:36 GMT -6
Yo, why did Levin’s channel pick up Glen Beck? I can’t stand that ass clown. Curious to see where the uranium one thing goes. You mean CRTV? IDK. I joined initially but when they dropped Steyn I dropped it. That was when they only had a handful of people. Now they have a ton. I thought Beck had his own channel. I can only listen to him on certain topics. The rest of the time his smugness and I'm so right just turns me off.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 11, 2018 18:42:58 GMT -6
Yo, why did Levin’s channel pick up Glen Beck? I can’t stand that ass clown. Curious to see where the uranium one thing goes. You mean CRTV? IDK. I joined initially but when they dropped Steyn I dropped it. That was when they only had a handful of people. Now they have a ton. I thought Beck had his own channel. I can only listen to him on certain topics. The rest of the time his smugness and I'm so right just turns me off. Yeah, I think his channel went bankrupt, and now there’s a stir bc CRTV dropped Styne for no reason and picked up never trumper Beck. I don’t listen, so I have no skin in the game, so was more looking for listeners perspective. Sounds like it’s not a big deal. Oh, I have listened to Levin a lot in the past. I like him. Super insightful, irritating voice. Lol
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 11, 2018 20:20:02 GMT -6
Yeah, I think his channel went bankrupt, and now there’s a stir bc CRTV dropped Styne for no reason and picked up never trumper Beck. I don’t listen, so I have no skin in the game, so was more looking for listeners perspective. Sounds like it’s not a big deal. Oh, I have listened to Levin a lot in the past. I like him. Super insightful, irritating voice. Lol Looks like Levin and Beck have merged and others are out. There was a time when Beck was okay but he's gone too far down the hole for me. I'm surprised Levin is hooking up with him. He most likely sees the money involved. He doesn't charge for his content so IDK if he's looking for money or what. Rush charges $6.99 a month and yopu know he probably has a million - 5% of his listeners - which adds up fast. Like I said I was there for Levin and Steyn but not after they dropped Steyn I was out. Especially at $90+ a year. www.thewrap.com/blaze-tv-hosts-michelle-malkin-gavin-mcinnes-out-after-crtv-merger/
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 12, 2018 8:46:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 12, 2018 10:27:42 GMT -6
You sure? Maddow and Don Lemon didn't mention this. In fact Lemon and his panel were laughing at Flynn for not having counsel present.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 13, 2018 8:58:00 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Dec 13, 2018 10:13:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 13, 2018 11:11:53 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 13, 2018 14:23:13 GMT -6
Was watching Don Lemon and his panel. Nothing but lies. all of them. And no one calls anyone out on anything. It's sickening. Anyone that says that Fox is nothing but lies is simply fooling themselves.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 13, 2018 15:15:31 GMT -6
Was watching Don Lemon and his panel. Nothing but lies. all of them. And no one calls anyone out on anything. It's sickening. Anyone that says that Fox is nothing but lies is simply fooling themselves. Hell, Chris Wallace went on a rant today saying lawyers dont "go rogue" or do anything outside what their clients have explicitly told them to do. It was the most dishonest, rediculous claim I have heard all week. And it was on FOX. FOX is nothing more than controlled opposition, imo.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 13, 2018 18:16:21 GMT -6
Wallace is a liberal and doesn't do a good job of hiding it. Better than Shep but that doesn't say much.
Yes, fox puts out the opposing views but it's not like they just say anything and hope it sticks. At least they put on opposing views and let them be expressed. When's the last time you saw a conservative get a fair shake with the MSM?
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 14, 2018 12:39:32 GMT -6
Wallace is a liberal and doesn't do a good job of hiding it. Better than Shep but that doesn't say much. Yes, fox puts out the opposing views but it's not like they just say anything and hope it sticks. At least they put on opposing views and let them be expressed. When's the last time you saw a conservative get a fair shake with the MSM? Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 17, 2018 19:35:31 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 17, 2018 19:35:42 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by atl1979 on Dec 17, 2018 21:36:19 GMT -6
Is he inferring that he was too stupid to doubt the validity of it in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 18, 2018 5:20:56 GMT -6
No. Now he just knows he's busted.
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Dec 18, 2018 10:11:41 GMT -6
Why hasn't Mueller questioned or indicted Carter Page? Seems like he would have been the centerpiece of this treasonous conspiracy to destroy democracy, right? I mean, he was the one person IN RUSSIA wheeling and dealing face to face with actual Russians. Shouldn't he be tried and executed for his treachery? Why is Mueller more focused on Flynn's "lies" and Manafort's tax evasion?
|
|
|
Post by sooner98 on Dec 18, 2018 10:14:58 GMT -6
Is he inferring that he was too stupid to doubt the validity of it in the first place? Yes, he is. Why did it take him TWO YEARS to come to this conclusion? He obviously didn't have the mental capability to see through this charade, like the rest of us can.
|
|
|
Post by kingswitz on Dec 18, 2018 12:07:38 GMT -6
Why hasn't Mueller questioned or indicted Carter Page? Seems like he would have been the centerpiece of this treasonous conspiracy to destroy democracy, right? I mean, he was the one person IN RUSSIA wheeling and dealing face to face with actual Russians. Shouldn't he be tried and executed for his treachery? Why is Mueller more focused on Flynn's "lies" and Manafort's tax evasion? Because discovery would open up all the stuff “they” don’t want the public to see. The setup would ALL be exposed and the SC deemed a fraud. This has been apparent for awhile.
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 18, 2018 15:51:51 GMT -6
Because discovery would open up all the stuff “they” don’t want the public to see. The setup would ALL be exposed and the SC deemed a fraud. This has been apparent for awhile. Let's be honest. It has been exposed. It's all out there. And if the media was honest and doing their job it would have been out there and there probably wouldn't have been a SC. I honestly believe this is the biggest political scandal in our history and no one is paying attention. Once the left yakes over the House these investigations will end. Just like the Clintons. It's obvious what they were doing with their foundation as well as how it tied in to her time as SOS as well as how it would have to her being president. Crickets. But let's scream about FB bots and porn stars. Read the books by Dan Bongino and Gregg Jarrett. They are both excellent road maps for this mess.
|
|
|
Post by oilsooner on Dec 18, 2018 16:54:47 GMT -6
Because discovery would open up all the stuff “they” don’t want the public to see. The setup would ALL be exposed and the SC deemed a fraud. This has been apparent for awhile. Let's be honest. It has been exposed. It's all out there. And if the media was honest and doing their job it would have been out there and there probably wouldn't have been a SC. I honestly believe this is the biggest political scandal in our history and no one is paying attention. Once the left yakes over the House these investigations will end. Just like the Clintons. It's obvious what they were doing with their foundation as well as how it tied in to her time as SOS as well as how it would have to her being president. Crickets. But let's scream about FB bots and porn stars. Read the books by Dan Bongino and Gregg Jarrett. They are both excellent road maps for this mess. Exactly. The left doesnt give two shits that the government overreached it powers, and they dont give two shits if that overreach was illegal. They only care that the target was Donald Trump. I mean, dont hate the game, hate the player, right?
|
|