|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 8, 2019 10:21:19 GMT -6
Seeing reports where both Michael Bloomberg and Eric Holder might join the 2020 Presidential race.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 8, 2019 10:23:38 GMT -6
dailycaller.com/2019/11/08/kamala-harris-fossil-fuel-workers-solar-panels/Thursday that unemployed fossil fuel industry workers can always “transition” to jobs in renewable energy — like installing wind turbines and solar panels. The Democratic presidential nominee was asked by The Weather Channel about the plight of energy workers who would be put out of work by a shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy, as recommended by the Green New Deal that Harris has endorsed.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 12, 2019 6:47:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 12, 2019 6:49:50 GMT -6
www.dailywire.com/news/castro-argues-iowa-and-new-hampshire-arent-diverse-enough-to-be-early-primary-statesFormer Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Julian Castro stated on Sunday that both Iowa and New Hampshire should give up their famed status as the first states in the nation to hold a caucus and a primary due to their lack of diverse constituents. “I actually do believe that we need to change the order of the states because I don’t believe that we’re the same country we were in 1972 — that is when Iowa first held its caucus first,” Castro said while speaking to NBC News. “And by the time we have the next presidential election in 2024, it will have been more than 50 years since 1972. Our country has changed a lot in those 50 years. The Democratic Party has changed a lot.” TOP ARTICLES 1/6 READ MORE LISTEN: Former Acting ICE Director Mulls Over Running To Unseat Anti-ICE Democratic Senator “What I really appreciate about Iowans and the folks in New Hampshire is that they take this process very seriously. They vet the candidates, they show up at town halls, they give people a good hearing,” he continued. “At the same time, demographically, it’s not reflective of the United States as a whole, certainly not reflective of the Democratic Party, and I believe that other states should have their chance.” “So, yes, of course we need to find other states,” Castro added. “That doesn’t mean that Iowa and New Hampshire still can’t play an important role, but I don’t believe that forever we should be married to Iowa and New Hampshire going first, and that’s just the truth of the way that I see it.” ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUE READING Castro’s remarks come after his Democratic presidential challenger Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) was asked the same question only days earlier while attending an Environmental Justice forum in Orangeburg, South Carolina. Warren notably dodged the question, rather contending that she is just “a player in the game.” While the former Obama official has been polling below 1% on average among Democratic primary voters in both Iowa and New Hampshire, Warren is leading the crowded primary field in both states. As of publication, the Massachusetts lawmaker sits at more than 21% support and 19% support on average in Iowa and New Hampshire, respectively. Last week Castro’s campaign revealed that it had fired its entire staff in both New Hampshire and South Carolina as it seeks to focus on opportunities in Iowa and Nevada. The news came after the campaign gave supporters an ultimatum to raise $0.8 million in donations by the end of October or else risk the end of his White House bid. Castro ultimately surpassed the goal and generated nearly $1 million by the deadline. The campaign said the fundraising haul will provide the presidential hopeful with the necessary resources to “sustain the campaign and make a push for the November and December Democratic debates.” Thus far, only ten candidates in the presidential primary field have qualified for the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) next debate — Castro has not yet met the required threshold. “I can imagine he’s frustrated,” said New Hampshire Democratic Chair Ray Buckley. “But blaming his campaign’s challenges on the voters of Iowa and New Hampshire is a bit much.”
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 13, 2019 18:39:57 GMT -6
many, many, many, many, many..........
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 14, 2019 21:31:07 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2019/11/14/live-updates-trump-holds-louisiana-rally-3/President Donald Trump will hold a Thursday evening rally in Bossier City, Louisiana, a day after the House started its public impeachment hearings and two days before Saturday’s gubernatorial runoff election between incumbent Democrat John Bel Edwards and Republican challenger Eddie Rispone. Stay tuned to Breitbart News for live updates. All times eastern. — 9:45 PM: Trump concludes his rally after his standard closing. He says the first step to his 2020 win begins Saturday in Louisiana. 9:35 PM: Trump, speaking about illegal immigration, thanks the border patrol, ICE and says his administration is “getting them out by the thousands.” 9:30 PM: Trump says “weak leaders sold you out” and stole the “crown jewels of your economy.” Trump says he is fighting for workers and the American dream while past administration sold out the country to China. 9:25 PM: Trump now speaks about record-low unemployment and poverty numbers for African-Americans. He says “after years of painful stagnation and decline,” real wages for low-income workers have gone up 9 percent. Trump says the “far-left Democrats” in Washington wants to abolish oil/natural gas. He mocks Beto and rips Democrats for wanting to “raise your taxes.” 9:16 PM: Trump introduces Louisiana Reps. and Senators. Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) thanks Trump for visiting the state again and says: “I stand before you tonight as a proud deplorable.” Kennedy, after mocking cosmopolitan elites who eat avocado toast and drink goat’s milk, says he believes everybody counts. 9:03 PM: Trump says Edwards wants “open borders,” wants radical pro-abortion policies, and “loves the fake news media.” He accuses the incumbent governor of breaking a “solemn vow” when he “pushed through the largest tax cut in the history of the state.” He says Edwards “lied to you” and “double crossed you.” Trump says Edwards cares about “illegal aliens and not American citizens.” He says under Edwards Louisiana has the highest murder rate in the country. He now introduces Rispone, who says: “Louisiana, we are Trump country. We love President Trump and he loves Louisiana.” 9:02 PM: Trump says voters can “send a tremendous message back to Washington” and “rebuke” the “socialists trying to sabotage our democracy and erase your cherished way of life in Louisiana.” He says Edwards is a “tool” of Washington Democrats like Schumer, Pelosi, and Schiff. 8:58 PM: Trump says 401Ks will get “cut in half” if Democrats win. Trump says all of the far-left Democrats will call up Edwards if he wins the election. “You gotta get out [and vote],” Trump tells crowd as they chant “Eddie, Eddie.” Trump continues: “You gotta give me a big win please, okay?” 8:57 PM: Trump rips the Washington Post for saying al-Baghdadi was a “great religious leader” and said if “the other side would have killed him,” he would have been the most evil person ever. 8:52 PM: Trump says Democrats don’t care about African Americans and only care about them “two months before the election.” He now again rips Hunter Biden and his “stupid fund.” He blasts the “fake news” for not wanting to write about it. Trump says if Biden gets the nomination, “we will have the lowest ratings in the history of debates” because “Joe is exhausted, tired.” 8:51 PM: Trump says evangelical leaders have told him the “church has never been more energized” because of what Democrats are trying to do to him with impeachment. Trump says “Democrats are trying to overthrow the last election because they know they are not going to win.” “The Democrats in Washington are trying to stop me because I’m fighting for you,” Trump claims. 8:46 PM: Trump rips Hunter Biden, mocks Schiff’s “little ten-inch neck.” “He will not make the LSU football team, that I can tell you,” Trump says. He says Schiff is a “bad guy, a dishonest guy.” Trump praises Republicans for sticking together and says the poll numbers say that “the people of this country aren’t buying it because we’re going up and they’re going down. Let’s keep it going for awhile.” 8:46 PM: Trump brags about taking down the “Bush dynasty” and the “Clinton dynasty” in the last election. He then adds the “very crooked Obama group.” 8:45 PM: Trump says “it’s much more difficult” to fight the “fake news” than Democrats. He calls them the “partnership from hell.” 8:40 PM: Trump accuses radical leftists (“Democrats”) of “ripping our country apart.” He now goes on about the Russian hoax and the Mueller Witch Hunt and impeachment. He says Democrats and their “deranged media partners” are pushing the impeachment witch hunt. Trump says Democrats “haven’t done a thing” since Pelosi became Speaker and their “lies will be exposed just like the last time.” Trump says “their scheme is already unraveling.” He mocks the “Never Trumpers” who testified yesterday. 8:38 PM: Trump now speaking about rebuilding the military and mentions the B-52 bombers at Barksdale AFB. “Our country is respected again,” Trump says. “With the awesome strength of the American warrior, we are defeating radical Islamic terrorism and the bloodthirsty savage known as al-Baghdadi is dead.” Trump says America’s enemies “don’t stand a chance” against the “power of the U.S. military.” He says America is “respected at the highest levels” now. 8:35 PM: Trump brings up the LSU-Alabama game. He says he’s thrilled to be back in the “Bayou State.” He says Rispone will “bring down your car insurance, bring down your taxes.” He calls Rispone a “true Louisiana patriot.” Trump says he really needs voters to send Washington a message that they will not let them destroy their futures and rob their children. Trump says voters have to vote on Saturday and then “go to the game.” LSU plays AT Ole Miss. “I’m thrilled to be back in the beautiful Bayou State with thousands of hardworking American citizens who believe in God, family, and country.” –@realdonaldtrump pic.twitter.com/0eOgYpnKar — GOP (@gop) November 15, 2019 8:30 PM: Trump ready to take the stage. 7:50 PM: Air Force One is wheels down with #POTUS at Barksdale Air Force Base #lagov pic.twitter.com/ZRC3flOjZq — Greg Hilburn (@greghilburn1) November 15, 2019 7:45 PM: Trump returns to a state that is buzzing with excitement after LSU likely punched its ticket to the SEC title game last weekend with its victory in Tuscaloosa and quarterback “Jeaux Burreaux” likely locked up his Heisman and may have jumped to the top of the draft board with his performance. Trump the campaigner and candidate fits the GOP base like head coach Ed Orgeron just fits LSU. That can’t be said for many of the candidates he often campaigns for on the stump. Trump’s rally is scheduled to start at 8 PM ET, but will likely a bit later… just as the Thursday Night Football game between resurgent and surging Stillers and the Cleveland Browns kicks off. Almost every seat is filled at @centurylinkctr for #trumprally @potus @realdonaldtrump @eddierispone @nbc6news @kmsstv pic.twitter.com/8wnnE3kkxt — Marquel Sennet (@marquelsennet) November 15, 2019 Air Force One wheels up to Louisiana for Trump campaign rally. pic.twitter.com/emSPpq0a39 — Mark Knoller (@markknoller) November 14, 2019 President Trump's rally in Bossier t.co/xZktWn94Su— Alexandra Meachum (@ameachum6) November 14, 2019 Not sure I’ve seen this before…A rally dog that is not on duty for police or Secret Service. Bossier City, Louisiana. pic.twitter.com/66G3XAm2BS — Kelly O'Donnell (@kellyo) November 14, 2019 A day after the first public hearing of impeachment inquiry, thousands line up to hear from President Trump at a campaign rally in Shreveport, Louisiana. (And yes, that is Free Bird playing) pic.twitter.com/Ke3r9ypZM6 — Kristen Holmes (@kristenhcnn) November 14, 2019 The doors are open! Folks are winding their way through the line to make their way into @centurylinkctr to see @realdonaldtrump rally. #TrumpRally #TrumpRallyBossier #yleh @nbc6news @kmsstv pic.twitter.com/MfgewEDAoQ — Jenna Jordan (@jennajordantv) November 14, 2019
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 21, 2019 17:39:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 22, 2019 11:33:28 GMT -6
The 2020 Democrat hopeful has been pandering to the black community and recently got endorsed by a radical Black Feminist Liberation group named “Black Womxn For.”
The Massachusetts Senator has spent her entire adult life lying about her Native American heritage in order to advance her career — she’s a rich white woman telling minorities that she understands their plight.
A group of black protesters interrupted Warren’s rally at Clark Atlanta University, a historically black university, demanding, “We want to be heard!” and she was visibly shaken.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 22, 2019 11:34:17 GMT -6
Struck a nerve:
|
|
|
|
Post by redstripe on Nov 22, 2019 11:43:12 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 22, 2019 14:00:20 GMT -6
www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/22/elizabeth-warren-calls-full-blown-national-conversation-about-reparations/Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on Thursday delivered a speech at Clark Atlanta University, and declared that it is time to adopt Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee’s (D-TX) legislation on reparations. Warren delivered a speech at the historically black university Thursday evening and stressed the need to pass Lee’s reparations legislation, which “establishes the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans.” “Let’s be clear: It’s time for our government to have a full-blown national conversation about reparations,” Warren wrote in a tweet containing a video of her remarks: “America was founded on principles of liberty and built on the backs of enslaved people. [It’s] time to adopt H.R. 40, Sheila Jackson Lee’s reparations plan. [It’s] time to do what’s right, so that our nation can begin to heal,” Warren stated. The commission, according to the summary, would examine slavery and discrimination from 1619 to the modern era and “recommend appropriate remedies.” While Warren said that would be a “big step,” she suggested that more must be done. “This is a big step but slavery is not the only history we must confront. Jim Crow was the lived reality in American up through the 1960s,” Warren said. She continued: Government redlining meant that too often, toxic waste dumps and polluting factories were located far away from white communities and right next to black communities. The 1994 crime bill exacerbated the mass incarceration that locked up millions of black men and women. So don’t talk about race-neutral laws. The federal government helped create the racial divide in this country through decades of active state-sponsored discrimination, and that means the federal government has a responsibility to fix it. The presidential hopeful argued that each of her plans has an element that will address what she considers racial injustice. For instance, she said her Green New Deal plan would “put racial and environmental justice at the center of our response to climate change.” “My health care plan will bring down the costs of prescription drugs and tackle the risks of black maternal mortality that is literally killing black women and their babies,” she continued, seemingly ignoring her support for abortion and the impact that has had on the black community. “My public education plan will put 800 billion new dollars in federal money into our public schools and quadruple the funding or schools that teach low-income children. My student debt cancellation plan will help close the black-white wealth gap in America,” she continued, triumphantly declaring that her plans are “all paid for.” “One more thing about those plans: They are all paid for, not by raising taxes one penny on working families,” she claimed. “They are all paid for by asking the wealthy and well-connected to just pay a fair share.” “It’s time for a wealth tax in America. Two cents!” she declared. This is not the first time Warren has signaled support for having a conversation on issuing reparations. She called for a “national, full-blown” conversation” in March: However, when asked about the “direct transfers of money” during a CNN town hall event in March, Warren dodged the question, instead stressing the need for further conversations. “If I could just follow up on Georgia’s question, you said you’re open to a conversation about reparations to the descendants of slaves and Native Americans? Might that include direct payments? Direct transfers of money?” CNN’s Jake Tapper asked. Warren replied: There’s a lot of ways to think about the way they should be formed. And I noticed Georgia’s question started with the frame of an apology and national recognition. We have a lot of experts around the country, a lot of activists that have a whole lot of different approaches to it and I think the best we can do right now “I love the idea of this congressional commission, let’s bring people together and let’s open that conversation as Americans. Let’s see what ideas people want to put on the table and let’s talk them through,” she continued. “Because I have to tell you, ignoring the problem is not working,” she added, failing to answer the specific question.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 22, 2019 14:38:53 GMT -6
thefederalist.com/2019/11/22/black-voters-take-issue-elizabeth-warren-plan-eradicate-charter-schools/Black Voters Take Issue With Elizabeth Warren’s Plan To Eradicate Charter Schools NOVEMBER 22, 2019 By Chrissy Clark 2020 Democratic hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts hosted a rally at a historically black college hoping to talk directly with black Atlanta voters. Her rally was disrupted by none other than, black voters who take issue with her plans to eradicate charter schools. According to ABC News, Warren spoke only a few words before the school choice organization Powerful Parent Network interrupted her in coordinated protest. The protestors stopped Warren’s speech for approximately 10 minutes. “Our voice, our choice,” the protestors chanted. At the event, Warren was attempting to connect with black voters. During her speech she stood under a banner that read, “value the work of black women.” She also hired a DJ to play Drake and DMX songs, and had Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., the first black Massachusetts Congresswoman, pumping up Warren and the crowd. “I’m here to make a commitment. When I am president of the United States, the lessons of black history will not be lost. Those lessons will live in every part of my presidency,” Warren said. “As a white woman, I will never fully understand the discrimination, pain and harm that black Americans have experienced just because of the color of their skin.” Warren continued by insisting the government create a reparations plan for black Americans. But, Warren’s plans to get rid of charter schools may be a big reason for her inability to build a coalition of black voters in key swing states like Georgia and South Carolina. A poll commissioned by Democrats For Education Reform found white Democrats oppose charter schools, while black and Hispanic Democrats are in favor of charter schools. The goal of many charter schools is to close the disparity in education between minorities and non-minorities. This is a perfect example of Warren pandering to black communities in order to earn votes, but not actually creating policies that reflect the intersectional desires of black people in America. Sarah Carpenter, the leader of Powerful Parent Network, told ABC that Warren needs to talk to black voters before crafting policy to eradicate charter schools. “I told [Warren], you gotta talk to real people on the ground,” Carpenter said. “It felt like she attacks our children’s choice, charter schools.”
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 22, 2019 17:23:34 GMT -6
hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/22/viewers-vote-feet-wednesdays-democratic-debate/It’s not just impeachment that Democrats can’t sell. The fifth Democratic presidential debate drew the lowest viewership of the series, despite all of the drama in Washington during the day. Or perhaps because of it, CNN argues. SEE ALSO: End of an era: Victoria’s Secret cancels fashion show Regardless of the reason, ratings cratered by 20% over the previous debate, which already wasn’t a ratings bonanza: RECOMMENDED Why you're not hearing more about that mass shooting in Fresno Wednesday’s Democratic debate, the fifth this year, was the least-watched debate of this election cycle. The ratings for MSNBC were down more than 20% from last month’s match-up on CNN. One obvious reason: The televised impeachment hearings earlier in the day sucked all the political oxygen out of the room. Some viewers who spent all day watching House testimony probably didn’t want to spend all night watching a debate. On the other hand, cable news viewership levels have been significantly elevated by the hearings, so that theoretically could have benefited MSNBC. But it didn’t. About 6.6 million people were watching between 9 p.m. and 11:15 p.m. ET, according to overnight Nielsen ratings. Did people burn out during the hearings earlier in the day? CNN Business describes that as an “obvious” reason, but that seems less than obvious. The last I heard, having a big event as a lead-in didn’t tend to hurt television ratings for the next show. Voters in the Emerson poll show high engagement with the hearings across all partisan demographics, but especially among Democrats, 75% of whom either watch or follow the hearings. If they’re that engaged on impeachment, why wouldn’t they be equally engaged on the effort to defeat Donald Trump next year? Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple called it a “mediocre” result, but claimed that those who tuned out missed something valuable: Actually, viewers didn’t miss out on anything. Having watched the debate myself, I can confidently state that the only significant development of any lasting value for voter choice was the acceleration of Joe Biden’s collapse of coherence. As I wrote in my analysis at The Week, the debate essentially proved why people shouldn’t bother to watch: For instance, can anyone identify without a transcript which candidate asserted that we must “unify the country”? Which candidate insisted that we have to get money out of politics? Who told the audience that Democrats are “focused on tomorrow”? Which issue(s) are “not a Democrat issue or a Republican issue”? How about identifying the person who plans to “bring this country together” as opposed to the one who will “restore the soul of this country,” or the one who wants to “heal the nation”? It’s a trick question. Nearly everyone on stage in Atlanta on Wednesday offered variations of these same clichés to moderators trying to squeeze in as many topics as possible. The fault for this does not lie entirely with the candidates, or the questioners, or even with the television cameras or the live audiences. The Democratic National Committee continues to insist on a full-stage format for these debates that ends up transforming them into game shows, and the fifth debate was no exception. And that is why these events will have less and less effect on the poll standings of the participants. Voters have seen this all before, over and over. This debate won’t change many minds. … Voters saw nearly nothing at the fifth democratic debate they hadn’t seen at other debates or could have easily assumed about the myriad and generalized Democratic Party agenda. Even Biden’s stumbles and gaffes have become routine enough that this particular performance will likely only have a small, temporary effect on his polling and fundraising. We can all look forward to the December debate, when most of these same candidates will be back to answer the same questions with the same canned responses. If voters want to know anything else, go to the contenders’ websites … and save themselves the bother of tuning in. The ratings showed that most Democrat voters didn’t need my advice to make the correct decision. Some might take this as a sign of flagging enthusiasm for the candidates themselves. The debate ratings decline, which had begun after the first debate in June, could have been part of the decision by Michael Bloomberg and Deval Patrick to jump into the race, even with two dozen candidates already in it. If so, it’s a stretch; the lack of enthusiasm is almost certainly linked to the debates themselves. Most of the frontrunners, save Biden, are still seeing strong fundraising numbers. It’s just that television viewers aren’t interested in re-runs. Republicans can afford to gloat over this development now, but they’d better be taking notes. In four years, the GOP will have a wide-open primary and likely a similar-sized field to succeed Trump, or to challenge a Democratic incumbent if Trump loses next year. The RNC used this same exact format in the last several cycles despite repeated complaints that it was corrosive to candidate credibility and nothing more than a zingerfest. The DNC should have learned a lesson from that in 2016 and didn’t. Will Republicans learn the lesson this time and come up with a new and better process for highlighting its candidates — while they can?
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 22, 2019 19:03:42 GMT -6
I've barely seen any clips. It sounds like it was awful.
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 22, 2019 19:24:12 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Nov 22, 2019 19:25:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Qanon on Nov 23, 2019 0:46:15 GMT -6
Lol...Your turn in the barrel Nunes ya fuckin traitor!
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 23, 2019 7:39:38 GMT -6
Lol...Your turn in the barrel Nunes ya fuckin traitor! CNN, etc have their own issues they need to be concerned with. Namely, the aforementioned Nunes lawsuit coming due to this shotty reporting and a certain student and their multi million dollar lawsuit that a federal judge allowed to continue. Nunes lawsuit: www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-devin-nunes-will-take-swift-legal-action-against-cnn-for-demonstrably-false-storyHouse Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) announced Friday night that he is filing a lawsuit against CNN over a report that they published the same evening that alleged an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani was willing to testify to Congress that Nunes met with a former Ukrainian prosecutor last year to discuss digging up dirt on former Vice President and current Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden. “The attorney, Joseph A. Bondy, represents Lev Parnas, the recently indicted Soviet-born American who worked with Giuliani to push claims of Democratic corruption in Ukraine,” CNN reported. “Bondy said that Parnas was told directly by the former Ukrainian official that he met last year in Vienna with Rep. Devin Nunes.” 00:21 / 00:30 SKIP AD “Mr. Parnas learned from former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Victor Shokin that Nunes had met with Shokin in Vienna last December,” Bondy told CNN. “Nunes had told Shokin of the urgent need to launch investigations into Burisma, Joe and Hunter Biden, and any purported Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election.” CNN claims that Bondy told them that Parnas and Nunes allegedly began communicating with each other around the time of the Vienna trip and that Parnas worked to put Nunes in contact with Ukrainian officials that could dig up dirt on Biden and Democrats in Ukraine. Nunes also plans to sue The Daily Beast for a story that it published earlier in the week that alleged that Parnas helped Nunes set up numerous meetings regarding Ukraine. In an exclusive statement provided to Breitbart News, Nunes said: “These demonstrably false and scandalous stories published by the Daily Beast and CNN are the perfect example of defamation and reckless disregard for the truth. Some political operative offered these fake stories to at least five different media outlets before finding someone irresponsible enough to publish them. I look forward to prosecuting these cases, including the media outlets, as well as the sources of their fake stories, to the fullest extent of the law. I intend to hold the Daily Beast and CNN accountable for their actions. They will find themselves in court soon after Thanksgiving.” CNN claims that they began to ask Nunes questions about his Vienna trip on November 14, to which Nunes responded to CNN: “I don’t talk to you in this lifetime or the next lifetime. At any time. On any question.” CNN asked Nunes about the trip again on Thursday, to which Nunes responded: “To be perfectly clear, I don’t acknowledge any questions from you in this lifetime or the next lifetime. I don’t acknowledge any question from you ever.” Nunes has long held a policy of not communicating with CNN, which can be evidenced in a clip from summer 2018. WATCH: Nunes does have a legitimate reason to not answer CNN, as the far-left network is notorious for making false claims about Republicans and publishing false stories that later have to be retracted. In late 2017, CNN published a story smearing then-Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci that alleged that Scaramucci was connected to a Russian investment fund that was supposedly under investigation by the U.S. Senate. Scaramucci took immediate legal action against CNN and the network was forced to retract the report and had to fire three reporters over the incident. In August, CNN’s Brian Stelter, on his show “Reliable Sources,” allowed a psychiatrist to falsely claim that President Donald Trump was “as destructive of person in this century as Hitler, Stalin, Mao were in the last century. He may be responsible for many more million deaths than they were.” Stelter did not challenge the claim and after experiencing intense backlash, gave an uncorroborated excuse for his inaction to the blatantly false statement. CNN also lied about former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s lawyer, Lanny Davis, being its source for a story whose central claim — that Cohen would testify that Trump knew in advance about the Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer — was also false. “On July 27, 2018, CNN published a blockbuster story: that Michael Cohen was prepared to tell Robert Mueller that President Trump knew in advanced about the Trump Tower meeting,” The Intercept reported. “There were, however, two problems with this story: first, CNN got caught blatantly lying when its reporters claimed that ‘contacted by CNN, one of Cohen’s attorneys, Lanny Davis, declined to comment’ (in fact, Davis was one of CNN’s key sources, if not its only source, for this story), and second, numerous other outlets retracted the story after the source, Davis, admitted it was a lie. CNN, however, to this date has refused to do either.” CNN has also posted false stories about: James Comey’s testimony The spread of misinformation on Twitter Republicans funding the anti-Trump dossier How Trump fed koi fish in Japan Donald Trump Jr. getting advanced notice of a dump of WikiLeaks emails A sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh that was already retracted Repeatedly spreading false statistics about school shootings Host shared a fake story about an AR-15 thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/336871-cnn-issues-correction-after-comey-statement-contradicts-reportingdailycaller.com/2017/09/29/exclusive-mainstream-media-reporting-about-twitter-fake-news-is-100-false/dailycaller.com/2017/10/27/cnn-spreads-fake-news-on-russian-dossier-video/dailycaller.com/2017/11/06/cnn-spreads-two-fake-narratives-during-trump-visit-in-japan/www.dailywire.com/news/fake-news-cnn-reports-bombshell-exclusive-russia-ryan-saavedradailycaller.com/2018/09/26/cnn-the-hill-brett-kavanaugh-rhode-island-sexual-assault-recanted/www.dailywire.com/news/propaganda-cnn-spreads-false-info-destroy-2nd-ryan-saavedradailycaller.com/2018/02/21/chris-cuomo-fake-gun-story/..................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 23, 2019 7:41:35 GMT -6
dailycaller.com/2019/11/22/elizabeth-warren-son-private-school/Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren denied sending her children to private schools, despite the fact that she sent her son to an elite private school. When school choice activists confronted her after a campaign rally Thursday, Warren said her children didn’t go to private schools. “We are going to have the same choice that you had for your kids, because I read that your children went to private schools,” one activist told Warren. “No, my children went to public schools,” the Massachusetts senator replied. WATCH: But publicly available records show Warren, who has pledged to crack down on school choice if elected, chose to send her son Alexander to Kirby Hall, an elite private school in the Austin area, as the Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported. Kirby Hall’s 1987 yearbook lists Alexander Warren among the school’s fifth-graders. Alexander, like most fifth-graders that year, turned 11 in 1987, public records accessed through the research service LexisNexis show. That coincided with Warren’s final year teaching at the University of Texas at Austin, which is located a short drive from the elite private school. Warren’s campaign told the Washington Free Beacon on Friday that despite the senator’s denial, she did in fact send her son to private school. (RELATED: Every Democratic 2020 Frontrunner Supports Bill Forcing Male Athletes Into Girls’ Sports) “Elizabeth’s daughter went to public school. Her son went to public school until 5th grade,” Kristen Orthman, communications director for the Warren campaign, told the Free Beacon. The group of parent activists interrupted a Warren campaign rally in Atlanta on Thursday with chants of “Our children, our choice!” and “We want to be heard!”
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 23, 2019 12:54:47 GMT -6
And now the GOP is running anti-coup ads in their districts. They are very worried. The GOP is bombarding their districts back home. And they want a much stronger counteroffensive from their own party and its allies. According to Politico GOP-aligned outside groups have spent roughly $8 million on TV spots this cycle in battleground districts. There are 31 Democrats who representing districts President Trump won in 2016. warroom.org/2019/11/23/politico-vulnerable-dems-spooked-by-gop-impeachment-ad-onslaught/www.politico.com/news/2019/11/22/democrats-house-impeachment-moderates-072972These 31 Democrats WILL LOSE THEIR SEAT if they DARE to vote for this sham impeachment! They already voted once to support the attempted coup. Via Paul Sperry. Tom O’Halleran (D-Ariz.) Lucy McBath’s (D-Ga.) Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.) Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.) Abby Finkenauer (D-Iowa) Dave Loebsack (D-Iowa) Cindy Axne’s (D-Iowa) Jared Golden (D-Maine) Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) Angie Craig (D-Minn.) Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) Susie Lee’s (D-Nev.) Chris Pappas’s (D-N.H.) Jefferson Van Drew (D-N.J.) Andy Kim (D-N.J.) Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) Xochitl Torres Small (D-N.M.) Max Rose (D-N.Y.) Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.) Antonio Delgado (D-N.Y.) Anthony Brindisi (D-N.Y.) Kendra Horn(D-Okla.) Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.) Conor Lamb (D-Pa.) Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.) Ben McAdams (D-Utah) Elaine Luria’s (D-Va.) Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.) Ron Kind (D-Wis.) |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Nov 23, 2019 12:57:30 GMT -6
Popular Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang tweeted on Saturday that he will no longer appear on MSNBC until they apologize on air for the lack of speaking time that he was given during this week’s primary debate.
Despite polling higher than many of the other candidates, Yang was only given six minutes and 48 seconds to speak at the Atlanta debate — far less than any other candidate.
Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg were all given over 12 minutes of speaking time.
Yang also pointed out that the network has been omitting him from their graphics — and once even used the wrong name when talking about him.
“They’ve omitted me from their graphics 12+ times, called me John Yang on air, and given me a fraction of the speaking time over 2 debates despite my polling higher than other candidates on stage. At some point you have to call it,” Yang added. “The whole time we have gotten stronger. This is actually bad for MSNBC. It will only get worse after I make the next debates and keep rising in the polls. The people are smarter than MSNBC would like to think.”
|
|
|
|
Post by Larry Maxwell on Nov 29, 2019 17:58:27 GMT -6
Hello sir / lady
NOTE:: USA and CANADA only without any Fee
You want to do Business, Start a new business, renovate your building, increase your chances of selling or simply increase your cash flow. Borrow to give life to your projects Purchase of real estate, realization of work, acquisition of a vehicle. Investment loan. Bring your projects to life with financing solutions from LARRY MAXWELL FIRM Regarding credit between individuals, we grant between $ 10,000 and $ 80,000,000, with an annual interest rate of 2%. For any loan, please contact usto receive our conditions! or contact us at: LarryMaxwellfunds@gmail.com OR WHATSAPP +18436059540
NOTE:: USA and Canada (No upfront fee)
Thanks © 2019 Co-operation.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Dec 2, 2019 13:46:26 GMT -6
When the delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention were deciding how to elect the president of the United States, they settled on a solution: the Electoral College.
Under the College, a temporary group of “electors” equal to the total number of representatives in Congress is created, with each state getting the same number of electoral votes as they have members of Congress. Most states have systems in which the candidate who gets the most votes wins all the state’s electoral votes. In modern times, whoever gets to 270 of the 538 total electoral votes wins the White House.
But Sen. Elizabeth Warren thinks she knows better than the Founding Fathers.
“My goal is to get elected—but I plan to be the last American president to be elected by the Electoral College. I want my second term to be elected by direct vote,” Warren said during a campaign event in Marion, Iowa, on Sunday.
“I want to get rid of it,” she said. “I just think this is how a democracy should work. Call me old fashioned, but I think the person who gets the most votes should win.”
Just five times in history has a presidential candidate on the popular vote but lost the Electoral College (it happened in 2016, when Hillary Clinton got more than 65 million votes and President Trump got more than 63 million votes, but Trump won the Electoral College by a vote of 304-227).
Democrats want to do away with the College in order to take away power in smaller states and give states with large urban populations more clout.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Dec 2, 2019 13:54:58 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 3, 2019 0:49:05 GMT -6
Popular Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang tweeted on Saturday that he will no longer appear on MSNBC until they apologize on air for the lack of speaking time that he was given during this week’s primary debate. Despite polling higher than many of the other candidates, Yang was only given six minutes and 48 seconds to speak at the Atlanta debate — far less than any other candidate. Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden and Mayor Pete Buttigieg were all given over 12 minutes of speaking time. Yang also pointed out that the network has been omitting him from their graphics — and once even used the wrong name when talking about him. “They’ve omitted me from their graphics 12+ times, called me John Yang on air, and given me a fraction of the speaking time over 2 debates despite my polling higher than other candidates on stage. At some point you have to call it,” Yang added. “The whole time we have gotten stronger. This is actually bad for MSNBC. It will only get worse after I make the next debates and keep rising in the polls. The people are smarter than MSNBC would like to think.” He's a parent whose kids kids kids kids kids kids will never have to sweat a check. The world is full of people who will never be affected by disasters like this. The elite will always have housing, food, medical care, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by kcrufnek on Dec 3, 2019 0:50:53 GMT -6
So Bloomberg - sorry, Mike - is on tape saying that poor people need to live longer so they can be taxed and keeping them poor will extend their lives? Thing is he fully believes what he's saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Dec 3, 2019 12:49:28 GMT -6
medium.com/@kamalaharris/i-am-suspending-my-campaign-today-6dca8cefb252Eleven months ago at the launch of our campaign in Oakland I told you all: “I am not perfect. But I will always speak with decency and moral clarity and treat all people with dignity and respect. I will lead with integrity. I will speak the truth.”
And that’s what I have tried to do every day of this campaign. So here’s the truth today.
I’ve taken stock and looked at this from every angle, and over the last few days have come to one of the hardest decisions of my life.
My campaign for president simply doesn’t have the financial resources we need to continue.
I’m not a billionaire. I can’t fund my own campaign. And as the campaign has gone on, it’s become harder and harder to raise the money we need to compete.
In good faith, I can’t tell you, my supporters and volunteers, that I have a path forward if I don’t believe I do.
So, to you my supporters, it is with deep regret — but also with deep gratitude — that I am suspending my campaign today…
|
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Dec 5, 2019 16:51:56 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by redstripe on Dec 6, 2019 9:51:06 GMT -6
medium.com/@kamalaharris/i-am-suspending-my-campaign-today-6dca8cefb252Eleven months ago at the launch of our campaign in Oakland I told you all: “I am not perfect. But I will always speak with decency and moral clarity and treat all people with dignity and respect. I will lead with integrity. I will speak the truth.”
And that’s what I have tried to do every day of this campaign. So here’s the truth today.
I’ve taken stock and looked at this from every angle, and over the last few days have come to one of the hardest decisions of my life.
My campaign for president simply doesn’t have the financial resources we need to continue.
I’m not a billionaire. I can’t fund my own campaign. And as the campaign has gone on, it’s become harder and harder to raise the money we need to compete.
In good faith, I can’t tell you, my supporters and volunteers, that I have a path forward if I don’t believe I do.
So, to you my supporters, it is with deep regret — but also with deep gratitude — that I am suspending my campaign today… Democrats are a bunch of rich racists obviously. |
|
|
|
Post by soonernvolved on Dec 9, 2019 10:24:55 GMT -6
www.zerohedge.com/political/controversy-erupts-after-elizabeth-warren-reveals-millions-corporate-consulting-incomeAfter months of dodging questions over her income, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) revealed on Sunday night that she made nearly $2 million from legal consulting for corporate clients while she was a law professor at Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and other law schools, starting in 1995. The income included $212,000 for representing Travelers Indemnity Co. in 2009, $190,000 for representing a department store chain, and $80,000 doing bankruptcy work for Enron creditors. The Washington Post immediately framed the disclosure as an example of hypocrisy, saying Warren's past income "doesn't fit neatly with her current presidential campaign brand as a crusader against corporate interests." www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sen-elizabeth-warren-earned-nearly-2-million-consulting-for-corporations-and-financial-firms-records-show/2019/12/08/e8f56638-1a18-11ea-87f7-f2e91143c60d_story.htmlFor instance, the documents released Sunday show that Warren made about $80,000 from work she did for creditors in the energy company Enron’s bankruptcy and $20,000 as a consultant for Dow Chemical, a company that was trying to limit the liability it faced from silicone breast implants that were made by a connected firm. -Washington Post Warren's critics, such as Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, seized on the opportunity to suggest that "While she advocates for socialism she hypocritically lives a millionaire lifestyle." Breaking: Elizabeth Warren just disclosed she made $1.9 million from her legal work representing big corporate clients While she advocates for socialism she hypocritically lives a millionaire lifestyle Socialism is the ideology of the ruling class elites, like Warren! — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) December 9, 2019 What the Post did not make immediately clear, however, is that Warren made all this money over the span of 17 years ("the figures disclosed Sunday show that nearly all of the money was made from cases filed after she got her job at Harvard in 1995") - drawing immediate criticism from many who suggested that WaPo's failure to highlight the time frame until the sixth paragraph was unfair.
|
|
