|
|
Post by NN on Jul 24, 2018 21:15:01 GMT -6
The first one is out. What a dumb dirtbag.
|
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 25, 2018 2:13:18 GMT -6
Your an idiot------The tape was one big NOTHING
|
|
|
|
Post by berniemadoff on Jul 25, 2018 6:00:30 GMT -6
Your an idiot------The tape was one big NOTHING **you're** You meant to use "your" in this way: "Your statement about the tape being NOTHING is absurd". No one has any idea where it could lead yet. Let it play out in the investigation of Mr. Cohen. |
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 25, 2018 6:25:35 GMT -6
It really doesn't matter which side of the fence you sit on...this is completely unethical on so many levels. First and foremost; attorney client privilige! Cohen is a fuck bag for recording a conversation without letting his client know...AND then to release it to the public.
|
|
|
|
Post by berniemadoff on Jul 25, 2018 6:30:52 GMT -6
It really doesn't matter which side of the fence you sit on...this is completely unethical on so many levels. First and foremost; attorney client privilige! Cohen is a fuck bag for recording a conversation without letting his client know...AND then to release it to the public. When I see the names of President Trump and Mr. Cohen ethics aren't exactly the first thing that come to mind. |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 6:46:36 GMT -6
It really doesn't matter which side of the fence you sit on...this is completely unethical on so many levels. First and foremost; attorney client privilige! Cohen is a fuck bag for recording a conversation without letting his client know...AND then to release it to the public. So we're concerned about ethics now? Goose and gander. And to me, what's interesting is that even Cohen, who is 'loyal' to Trump knows Trump well enough to know that he's a conniving dirtbag that one has to protect himself against by recording him to cover his own butt when the poop eventually hits the fan. Much foresight on Cohen's part despite giving up client privilege. |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 7:14:03 GMT -6
This could go into the "stupid things Trump says/does" thread but since it's specific to this I'll just put it here.
This buffoon is trying to get YOU and I to believe (and many of you will I'm sure. I can think of three of the top of my head) that there is now some conspiracy by suggesting the absence of the rest of the tape is somehow part of that conspiracy. "Why did the tape end so abruptly?" he is saying. lol.
Word is, at after the tape abruptly ended he pledged all of his material goods Sally Struthers and the starving children of Africa.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1tc on Jul 25, 2018 7:34:44 GMT -6
I’m curious as to why Trump allowed it to be released. Haven’t heard it yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 7:42:56 GMT -6
I’m curious as to why Trump allowed it to be released. Haven’t heard it yet. Whatever reason he gives I'm sure it will be a lie. That much we can count on. People on fake news last night were saying he wants to be "honest"  |
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 25, 2018 7:46:06 GMT -6
It really doesn't matter which side of the fence you sit on...this is completely unethical on so many levels. First and foremost; attorney client privilige! Cohen is a fuck bag for recording a conversation without letting his client know...AND then to release it to the public. So we're concerned about ethics now? Goose and gander. And to me, what's interesting is that even Cohen, who is 'loyal' to Trump knows Trump well enough to know that he's a conniving dirtbag that one has to protect himself against by recording him to cover his own butt when the poop eventually hits the fan. Much foresight on Cohen's part despite giving up client privilege. You continue to remain mired in your hate for Trump...that's fine, it's your deal. I am trying to keep it as ambiguous as possible. You call it "foresight", I call it being a slimy mofo. |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 7:53:23 GMT -6
So we're concerned about ethics now? Goose and gander. And to me, what's interesting is that even Cohen, who is 'loyal' to Trump knows Trump well enough to know that he's a conniving dirtbag that one has to protect himself against by recording him to cover his own butt when the poop eventually hits the fan. Much foresight on Cohen's part despite giving up client privilege. You continue to remain mired in your hate for Trump...that's fine, it's your deal. I am trying to keep it as ambiguous as possible. You call it "foresight", I call it being a slimy mofo. Really? If you were doing 'business' with Trump or someone who displays the lack of character that he does on a continue basis and a "me first" attitude about everything, you wouldn't protect yourself? I'm not saying releasing the tapes was good or ethical (again, since when does Trump care about anything ethical?), but Cohen is smart enough to know that Trump would hang him out to dry if he knew it would save his own butt. Cohen probably wising up now and realizing that wife and family are more important than a lavish lifestyle afforded you by being incahoots with a guy like Trump. I'm sure he's got more to share as well. Clock is ticking. And just as a side note, I like how some of you act like my dislike of Trump is unfounded. Like it has nothing to do with who he is and the behavior he exhibits. I can't stand Hillary either. Is it just because I have some arbitrary reason to dislike her or is it because of who she is and what she's done? |
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 25, 2018 7:56:40 GMT -6
So....what all was on the tape? any links?
|
|
|
|
Post by berniemadoff on Jul 25, 2018 7:59:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 25, 2018 8:02:17 GMT -6
sorry, i don't want to wade through all of the political garbage to find them. I guess it is too much to ask that someone that starts a thread about a topic actually includes the subject of that topic. |
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 25, 2018 8:04:25 GMT -6
is it only that 2 minute clip? Or is there more? B/c I fail to see any significance in that 2 minute clip. What are we supposed to be outraged over?
|
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 8:06:52 GMT -6
So....what all was on the tape? any links? Nothing earth shattering. Just solidifies what those of us who refuse to bend the knee already knew: that he knew about the money being paid to his little sex kittens and he was doing it to hide right before the election. That's all.....so far. 12 more tapes out there. |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 8:08:02 GMT -6
is it only that 2 minute clip? Or is there more? B/c I fail to see any significance in that 2 minute clip. What are we supposed to be outraged over? Of course you don't. Haha. No one is expecting you to be outraged and no one is outraged. Just stating that it's further evidence the guy is a dirtbag liar that can't be trusted. |
|
|
|
Post by soonerbounce13 on Jul 25, 2018 8:13:35 GMT -6
is it only that 2 minute clip? Or is there more? B/c I fail to see any significance in that 2 minute clip. What are we supposed to be outraged over? Of course you don't. Haha. No one is expecting you to be outraged and no one is outraged. Just stating that it's further evidence the guy is a dirtbag liar that can't be trusted. No one is outraged? ok And tell me why it is evidence that he is a dirtbag. I'm admitting i'm ignorant on the significance of the tapes. Why is it proof that he knew about the payouts? |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 8:18:54 GMT -6
Of course you don't. Haha. No one is expecting you to be outraged and no one is outraged. Just stating that it's further evidence the guy is a dirtbag liar that can't be trusted. No one is outraged? ok And tell me why it is evidence that he is a dirtbag. I'm admitting i'm ignorant on the significance of the tapes. Why is it proof that he knew about the payouts? Because the corporation they created for that purpose is being discussed? Just do this: All those same "dots" that you and other posters here like to connect when it involves something or someone you're against like Mueller, do that with the audio. Except there's less assumption needed. And you really don't need to connect the dots as I don't think he's denying the context of the discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by redrex1 on Jul 25, 2018 8:20:22 GMT -6
Your an idiot------The tape was one big NOTHING **you're** You meant to use "your" in this way: "Your statement about the tape being NOTHING is absurd". No one has any idea where it could lead yet. Let it play out in the investigation of Mr. Cohen. Sorry Miss Crump |
|
|
|
Post by Cooter Brown on Jul 25, 2018 8:25:02 GMT -6
To borrow a line from Boots in another thread...Certainly embarrassing to him and Melania, but I fail to grasp how responding to extortion is illegal.
What is the significance? I mean other than to continue to drudge up past shortcomings from a man who is certainly not the most upstanding citizen in this country.
|
|
|
|
Post by reddeadredemption on Jul 25, 2018 8:26:42 GMT -6
Of course you don't. Haha. No one is expecting you to be outraged and no one is outraged. Just stating that it's further evidence the guy is a dirtbag liar that can't be trusted. No one is outraged? ok And tell me why it is evidence that he is a dirtbag. I'm admitting i'm ignorant on the significance of the tapes. Why is it proof that he knew about the payouts? Because they were talking about their "friend David" - also known as David Dennison, aka Trump's alias for the sham company that provided payouts to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal (ETA: seeing that this could also be David Pecker, chairman and CEO of AMI who bought McDougal's story). You can hear him say in the tape, "So what are we gonna pay, $150(k)?" 3:07 in this video: |
|
|
|
Post by politicalmexininja on Jul 25, 2018 8:29:53 GMT -6
He's an adulterer...we already knew this. This is the main reason I don't like him. And??? Again, other option was Hillary. I'd dang near choose Lucifer over her....not much difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 8:30:40 GMT -6
No one is outraged? ok And tell me why it is evidence that he is a dirtbag. I'm admitting i'm ignorant on the significance of the tapes. Why is it proof that he knew about the payouts? Because they were talking about their "friend David" - also known as David Dennison, aka Trump's alias for the sham company that provided payouts to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. You can hear him say in the tape, "So what are we gonna pay, $150(k)?" 3:07 in this video: Trumpers: "well...that could mean anything. Besides, whoever said that I wanted a president I could trust, especially when things might get bad in the world? Doesn't bother me this man seems incapable of telling the truth about the smallest of things whether it's crowd size or saying he knew that he was paying off hookers. What's the big deal?" |
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jul 25, 2018 8:35:54 GMT -6
He's an adulterer...we already knew this. This is the main reason I don't like him. And??? Again, other option was Hillary. I'd dang near choose Lucifer over her....not much difference. There is also no evidence this has occurred as a sitting president much unlike Clinton and Kennedy who were both democrats, but liberals somehow find a way to overlook the obvious. Again, if they can make a spectacle out of it they will. If they can pin it on someone else they will. We call it a guaranteed response. |
|
|
|
Post by reddeadredemption on Jul 25, 2018 9:07:39 GMT -6
He's an adulterer...we already knew this. This is the main reason I don't like him. And??? Again, other option was Hillary. I'd dang near choose Lucifer over her....not much difference. There is also no evidence this has occurred as a sitting president much unlike Clinton and Kennedy who were both democrats, but liberals somehow find a way to overlook the obvious. Again, if they can make a spectacle out of it they will. If they can pin it on someone else they will. We call it a guaranteed response. What does ANYTHING that Clinton (20+ years ago) and Kennedy (50+ years ago) did have to do with Trump in 2018? Good lord, the whataboutisms on this board are just absurd. And sitting president or not, illegal campaign finance contributions/hush money are a big deal for a candidate at any level of government, let alone the presidency. |
|
|
|
Post by okirishfan on Jul 25, 2018 9:14:53 GMT -6
There is also no evidence this has occurred as a sitting president much unlike Clinton and Kennedy who were both democrats, but liberals somehow find a way to overlook the obvious. Again, if they can make a spectacle out of it they will. If they can pin it on someone else they will. We call it a guaranteed response. What does ANYTHING that Clinton (20+ years ago) and Kennedy (50+ years ago) did have to do with Trump in 2018? Good lord, the whataboutisms on this board are just absurd. And sitting president or not, illegal campaign finance contributions/hush money are a big deal for a candidate at any level of government, let alone the presidency. Only a big deal when the other guy does it...or so it appears. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jul 25, 2018 9:37:42 GMT -6
There is also no evidence this has occurred as a sitting president much unlike Clinton and Kennedy who were both democrats, but liberals somehow find a way to overlook the obvious. Again, if they can make a spectacle out of it they will. If they can pin it on someone else they will. We call it a guaranteed response. What does ANYTHING that Clinton (20+ years ago) and Kennedy (50+ years ago) did have to do with Trump in 2018? Good lord, the whataboutisms on this board are just absurd. And sitting president or not, illegal campaign finance contributions/hush money are a big deal for a candidate at any level of government, let alone the presidency. Because there were no liberal rocks to throw at the presidents I mentioned and I only mentioned two, that's why. Secondly, if everything in life is related to something else then there is no 'whataboutism.' If there are aspects of life which are not related to anything else then 'whataboutism' exists, but since there are no things which exist in a vacuum on its own then it never existed, so you could throw around all the meaningless superlatives you want. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepdog on Jul 25, 2018 9:39:28 GMT -6
What does ANYTHING that Clinton (20+ years ago) and Kennedy (50+ years ago) did have to do with Trump in 2018? Good lord, the whataboutisms on this board are just absurd. And sitting president or not, illegal campaign finance contributions/hush money are a big deal for a candidate at any level of government, let alone the presidency. Only a big deal when the other guy does it...or so it appears. Or it's called being consistent rather than being a reservoir of convenience. |
|
|
|
Post by xingtherubicon on Jul 25, 2018 10:40:51 GMT -6
He's an adulterer...we already knew this. This is the main reason I don't like him. And??? Again, other option was Hillary. I'd dang near choose Lucifer over her....not much difference. The collusion fell through. They have nowhere else to go. |
|
